Abstract
Conventional E-C technique of mask holding is unreliable during single person bag mask ventilation (BMV) due mainly to leak around the mask and inexperience of the persons. In this manikin study, conventional E-C technique was compared with E-O technique during single person BMV both with experienced (n = 50) and novice (n = 50) volunteers. The E-O technique involved encircling the mask neck with the web between thumb and index finger while the other digits provided chin lift. Two independent observers recorded the chest expansion as 1 (nil), 2 (minimal), 3 (moderate) and 4 (good). For analysis ideal and average chest expansion were clubbed as acceptable. E-C technique in experienced volunteers showed acceptable results in 49 (31 + 18) occasions, while with novices acceptable is 39 (17 + 22). With E-O technique, expansion was acceptable in 47 (38 + 9) experienced volunteers, and acceptable in 46 (32 + 14) novices. (P = 0.003). In cross over analysis for experienced volunteers, similar chest expansion was obtained on 30 occasions with both techniques, E-C better than E-O on 8 and E-O better than E-C on 12 occasions. Novices had comparable results on 17 occasions, E-C better than E-O on 8 and E-O better than E-C on 25 occasions (P = 0.016). The conventionally taught E-C technique of single person BMV provides acceptable chest expansion on most occasions with experienced operators than novices. Novices should use E-O technique as the first choice for single person BMV. Both techniques may be used interchangeably when one fails.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berg RA, Hemphill R, Abella BS, Aufderheide TP, Cave DM, Hazinski MF, Lerner EB, Rea TD, Sayre MR, Swor RA. Adult basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2010;122:S685–705.
Morrison LJ, Deakin CD, Morley PT, Callaway CW, Kerber RE, Kronick SL, Lavonas EJ, Link MS, Neumar RW, Otto CW, Parr M, Shuster M, Sunde K, Peberdy MA, Tang W, Hoek TL, Böttiger BW, Drajer S, Lim SH, Nolan JP, Advanced Life Support Chapter Collaborators. Adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2010;122:S729–67.
Whymark C, Moores A, MacLeod AD. A Scottish national prospective study of airway management skills in new-start SHOs. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97:473–5.
El-Orbany M, Woehlck HJ. Difficult mask ventilation. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:1870–80.
Joffe AM, Hetzel S, Liew EC. A two-handed jaw-thrust technique is superior to the one-handed “E-C” clamp technique for mask ventilation in the apnoeic unconscious person. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:873–9.
American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:1269–77.
Greenberg RS. Facemask, nasal and oral airway devices. Anesthesiol Clin N Am. 2002;20:833–61.
De Regge M, Vogels C, Monsieurs KG, Calle PA. Retention of ventilation skills of emergency nurses after training with the SMART BAG compared to a standard bag-valve-mask. Resuscitation. 2006;68:379–84.
Elling R, Politis J. An evaluation of emergency medical technicians’ ability to use manual ventilation devices. Ann Emerg Med. 1983;12:765–8.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Umesh, G., Krishna, R., Chaudhuri, S. et al. E-O technique is superior to E-C technique in manikins during single person bag mask ventilation performed by novices. J Clin Monit Comput 28, 269–273 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-013-9531-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-013-9531-9