Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of Forehead Venous Pressure as a Measure of Respiratory Effort for the Diagnosis of Sleep Apnea

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of the study was to validate the measurement of Forehead Venous Pressure derived from a single site on the forehead as an alternative to esophageal manometry and respiratory effort bands in the differential diagnosis of sleep apnea.

Methods

Fourteen subjects underwent a laboratory polysomnography concurrently with ARES Unicorder at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Two-hundred respiratory events were selected by a scorer boarded in sleep medicine and classified into six event categories used in the differential diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing. Four sets of events were prepared, each containing airflow and one of four measures of respiratory effort (i.e., esophageal manometer, chest and abdomen bands, and forehead venous pressure). A second board-certified scorer scored each set of events twice while blinded to the type of the effort signal.

Results

The inter-rater Kappa scores across all event types indicated all four effort signals provided moderate agreement (κ = 0.43-0.47). When comparing the intra-rater Kappa scores, the chest belt was superior (κ = 0.88) to the esophageal manometry, FVP and abdomen belt (κ = 0.78-0.82). The Kappa scores for the intra-rater comparison with the esophageal serving as the gold standard, FVP abdomen and chest all showed near perfect agreement (κ = 0.81-0.86). The esophageal manometer and FVP provided slightly better inter-rater agreement in the detection of both obstructive hypopneas and apneas as compared to the chest and abdomen belts. There was a 20–30% drop in inter-rater reliability in the detection of flow-limitation and ventilation-change events compared to obstructive events, and all effort signals showed poor inter-rater agreement for central and mixed events.

Conclusions

The results of the study suggest that the FVP can serve as an alternative to respiratory bands in the differential diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing, and in the recognition of patients appropriate for bilevel continuous positive airway pressure devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Woodson BT, Wooten MR. A multisensory solid-state pressure manometer to identify the level of collapse in obstructive sleep apnea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 107: 651–656.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chediak AD, Demirozu MC, Nay KN. Alpha EEG sleep produced by balloon catheterization of the esophagus. Sleep 1990; 13:369–370.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chervin RD, Aldrich MS. Effect of esophageal monitoring on sleep architecture. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 156: 881–885.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Redline S, Sanders MH, Lind BK et al. Methods for obtaining and analyzing unattended polysomnography data for a multicenter study. Sleep 1998; 21(7): 759–767.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. White DP, Gibb TJ, Wall JM, Westbrook PR. Assessment of accuracy and analysis time of a novel device to monitor sleep and breathing at home. Sleep 1995; 18(2): 115–126.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Farre R, Montserrat JM, Navajas D. Noninvasive monitoring of respiratory mechanics during sleep. Eur Respir J 2004; 24: 1052–1060.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Argod J, Pepin JL, Levy P. Differentiating obstructive and central sleep respiratory events using pulse transit time (PPT). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 158: 1778–1783.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Argod J, Pepin JL, Smith RP, Levy P. Comparison of esophageal pressure with pulse transit time (PPT) as a measure of respiratory effort for scoring obstructive non-apneic respiratory events. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 87–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Condos R, Norman RG, Krishnasamy I et al. Flow limitation as noninvasive assessment of residual upper-airway resistance during continuous positive airway pressure therapy of obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994; 150: 475–480.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Series F, Marc I. Accuracy of breath-by-breath analysis of flow-volume loop in identifying sleep-induced flow-limited breathing cycles in sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome. Clin Sci 1995; 88: 707–712.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hosselet, JJ, Norman RG, Ayappa I, Rapoport DM. Detection of flow limitation with a nasal canula/pressure transducer system. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157: 1461–1467.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Montserrat JM, Farré R, Ballester E, et al. Evaluation of nasal prongs for estimating nasal flow. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 155: 211–215.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vegfors M, Ugnell H, Hok B, et al. Experimental evaluation of two new sensors for respiratory rate monitoring. Physiol Meas 1993; 14: 171–181.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nilsson L, Johansson A, Kalman S. Monitoring of respiratory rate in postoperative care using a new photoplethysmographic technique. J Clin Monit 2000; 16: 309–315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Johansson A, Oberg PA, Sedin G. Monitoring of heart and respiratory rates in newborn infants using a new photoplethysmographic technique. J Clin Monit 1999; 15: 461–467.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakajima K, Tamura J, Miike H. Monitoring of heart and respiratory rates by photoplethysmography using a digital filtering technique. Med Eng Phys 1996; 5: 365–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dorlas JC, Nijboer JA. Photo-electric plethysmography as a monitoring device in anaesthesia: application and interpretation. Br J Anaesthesiol 1985; 57: 524–530.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bernardi L, Radaelli A, Solda PL et al. Autonomic control of skin microvessels: assessment by power spectrum of photoplethysmographic waves. Clin Sci 1996; 90: 345–355.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Johansson A, Oberg PA. Estimation of respiratory volumes from the photoplethysmographic signal. Part 2: a model study. Med Biol Eng Comput 1999; 37: 48–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Johansson A, Oberg PA. Estimation of respiratory volumes from the photoplethysmographic signal. Part 1: experimental results. Med Biol Eng Comput 1999; 37: 42–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nilsson L, Johansson A, Kalman S. Respiratory variations in the reflection mode photoplethysmographic signal: relations to peripheral venous pressure. Med Biol Eng Comput 2003; 41: 249–254.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nilsson L, Johansson A, Kalman S. Macrocirculation is not the sole determinant of the respiratory induced variations in the reflection mode photoplethysmographic signal. Physiol Meas 2003; 24: 925–937.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lea S, Ali NJ, Godman M et al. Systolic blood pressure swings reflect inspiratory effort during simulated obstructive sleep apnea. In: Horne J (ed.) Sleep 1990. Bochum, Pontanagel Press, pp. 178–181.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ayappa I, Norman RG, Seelall V, Rapoport DM. Validation of a self-applied unattended monitor for sleep disordered breathing. J Clin Sleep Med 2007; 4(1): 26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–174.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lindberg LG, Ugnell H, Oberg PA. Monitoring of heart and respiratory rates using a fiber-optic sensor. Med Biol Eng Comput 1992; 30:533–537.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Macefield V G, Wallin BG. Modulation of muscle sympathetic activity during spontaneous and artificial ventilation and apnoea in humans Journal of Autonomic Nervous System 1995; 53: 137–147.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Thomas RJ. Arousals in sleep-disordered breathing: patterns and implications. Sleep 2003; 26(8): 1042–1047.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Norman RG, Pal I, Stewart C, et al. Inter-observer agreement among sleep scorers from five different centers on a large dataset. Sleep 2003; 23(7): 901–908.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel J. Levendowski MBA.

Additional information

Popovic D, King C, Guerrero M, Levendowski DJ, Henninger D, Westbrook PR. Validation of forehead venous pressure as a measure of respiratory effort for the diagnosis of sleep apnea.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Popovic, D., King, C., Guerrero, M. et al. Validation of Forehead Venous Pressure as a Measure of Respiratory Effort for the Diagnosis of Sleep Apnea. J Clin Monit Comput 23, 1–10 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-008-9154-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-008-9154-8

Keywords

Navigation