Abstract
Objective
Arterial pulse contour analysis is gaining widespread acceptance as a monitor of continuous cardiac output (CO). While this type of CO measurement is thought to provide acceptable continuous measurements, only a few studies have tested its accuracy and repeatability under unstable hemodynamic conditions. We compared continuous CO measurement using the pulse contour method (PCCO) before and after calibration with intermittent transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output (TpCO).
Method
We compared the two methods of CO measurements in 15 Landrace pigs weighing 20–25 kg in an experimental model of sepsis. Nine pigs were given an infusion of E. coli lipopolysacchride (LPS), and six pigs acted as controls. PCCO values before and after calibration (PCCO1 and PCCO2 respectively) were registered, and their errors relative to TpCO measurements were compared.
Results
The mean coefficient of variation for repeated PCCO measurements was 6.85% for the control group, and 13.99% for the endotoxin group. The range of TpCO was 1.01–3.15 L/min. In the control group the bias ±2SD was 0.11 ± 0.53 L/min (TpCO vs PCCO1) and −0.02 ± 0.38 L/min (TpCO vs PCCO2). In the endotoxin group, the agreement was poor between TpCO and PCCO1, 0.08 ± 1.02 L/min. This improved after calibration (TpCO vs PCCO2) to 0.01 ± 0.31 L/min.
Conclusions
In hemodynamically stable pigs, both pre- and post-calibration PCCO measurements agreed well with the intermittent transpulmonary thermodilution technique. However, during hemodynamic instability, and pre-calibration PCCO values had wide limits of agreement compared with TpCO. This was reflected by larger coefficients of variation for PCCO in hemodynamic instability. The error of PCCO measurement improved markedly after calibration, with bias and limits of agreement within clinically acceptable limits.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dalen JE, Bone RC. Is it time to pull the pulmonary artery catheter? J Am Med Assoc 1996;276:916–918
Pinsky MR. The meaning of cardiac output. Editorial. Intensive Care Med 1990;16:415–417
Harvey S, Harrison DA, Singer M et al Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-man)—a randomized control trial. Lancet 2005;366:472–477
Gödje O, Thiel C, Lamm P et al Less invasive, continuous hemodynamic monitoring during minimally invasive coronary surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:1532–1536
Gödje O, Höeke K, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Faltchauser A, Lamm P, Reichart B. Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1999;27:2407–2412
Sakka SG, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellman A. Comparison of pulmonary artery and arterial thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients. Int Care Med 1999;25:843–846
Zollner C, Haller M, Weis M et al. Beat-to-beat measurement of cardiac output by intravascular pulse contour analysis: A prospective criterion standard study in patients after cardiac surgery. JCTVA 2000;14:125–129
Kunstcher MV, Blome-Eberwein S, Pelzer M et al Transcardiopulmonary vs pulmonary arterial thermodilution methods for hemodynamic monitoring of burned patients. J Burn Care Rehabil 2002;23:21–26
Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Pompei L et al Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement: pulmonary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:350–356
Rauch H, Müller M, Fleischer F et al Pulse contour analysis versus thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002;46:424–429
Bajorat J, Hofmockel R, Vagts DA et al Comparison of invasive and less-invasive techniques of cardiac output measurement under different haemodynamic conditions in a pig model. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006;23:23–30
Felbinger TW, Reuter DA, Eltzschig HK et al Cardiac index measurements during rapid preload changes: a pulmonary artery thermodilution with arterial pulse contour analysis. J Clin Anesth 2005;17:241–248
Rödig G, Prasser C, Keyl C, Liebold A, Hobbhahn J. Continuous cardiac output measurement: pulse contour analysis vs thermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients. Br J Anaesth 1999;82:525–530
Scheurholz T, Cobas Meyer M, Friedrich L et al. Reliability of continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis in porcine septic shock. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 2006;50:407–413
Irlbeck M, Forst H, Briegel J et al. Continuous measurement of cardiac output using pulse contour analysis. Anaesthetist 1995;44:493–500
Gödje O, Höke K, Goetz A et al. Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability. Crit Care Med 2002;30:52–58
Altman D. Practical statistics in medical research. Routledge, UK, 2005, ISBN-1584880392
Bland M. Introduction to medical statistics. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK, 1995, pp 266–269
Acknowledgment
Supported by grants from the Region Skåne County Council, Sweden.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Johansson A, Chew M. Reliability of continuous pulse contour cardiac output measurement during hemodynamic instability.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johansson, A., Chew, M. Reliability of Continuous Pulse Contour Cardiac Output Measurement during Hemodynamic Instability. J Clin Monit Comput 21, 237–242 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-007-9079-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-007-9079-7