Skip to main content
Log in

Seasonal barotropic sea surface height fluctuation in relation to regional ocean mass variation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Oceanography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A consistency between seasonal fluctuation of actual sea surface height (SSH) and those caused by mass and density variations in gyre-scale regions is examined. The SSH obtained from satellite altimetry (altimetric SSH) is adopted as the actual SSH. SSH caused by mass variation (mass-related SSH) is simulated using a barotropic global ocean model forced by water flux, wind stress and surface pressure. SSH caused by density variation (steric SSH) is calculated from water density profile, i.e. temperature and salinity profiles. The model SSH well represents mass-related SSH for gyre-scale regional means, and seasonal fluctuation of the altimetric SSH corrected for the model SSH is similar to that of steric SSH above a pressure level larger than 300 dbar. The results indicate that the mass-related SSH does not much respond to the baroclinic adjustment to the seasonally varying wind stress curl. The mass-related SSH forced by wind stress and surface pressure should be accounted for regional evaluation, though it is not necessary for global mean evaluation. Detection of steric SSH from altimetric SSH would be useful for assimilation approaches in which the altimetric SSH is treated as the variable reflecting subsurface temperature and salinity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonov JI, Seidov D, Boyer TP, Locarnini RA, Mishonov AV, Garcia HE, Baranova OK, Zweng MM, Johnson DR (2010) World Ocean Atlas 2009 vol 2: salinity. In: Levitus S (ed) NOAA Atlas NESDIS 69. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, p 184

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmaseda MA, Vidard A, Anderson DLT (2008) The ECMWF ocean analysis system: ORA-S3. Mon Weather Rev 136:3018–3034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrère L, Lyard F (2003) Modeling the barotropic response of the global ocean to atmospheric wind and pressure forcing—comparison with observation. Geophys Res Lett 30:1275. doi:10.1029/2002GL016473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cazenave A, Dominh K, Guinehut S, Berthier E, Llovel W, Ramillien G, Ablain M, Larnicol G (2009) Sea level budget over 2003–2008: a reevaluation from GRACE space gravimetry, satellite altimetry and Argo. Glob Planet Change 65:83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers DP (2006) Observing seasonal steric sea level variations with GRACE and satellite altimetry. J Geophys Res 111. doi:10.1029/2005JC002914

  • Chambers DP, Bonin JA (2012) Evaluation of release-05 GRACE time-variable gravity coefficients over the ocean. Ocean Sci Discuss 9:2187–2214. doi:10.5194/osd-9-2187-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JL, Wilson CR, Chambers DP, Nerem RS, Tapley BD (1998) Seasonal global water mass budget and mean sea level variations. Geophys Res Lett 25:3555–3558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JL, Wilson CR, Tapley BD, Famiglietti JS, Rodell Matt (2005) Seasonal global mean sea level change from satellite altimeter, GRACE, and geophysical models. J Geod 79:532–539. doi:10.1007/s00190-005-0005-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii Y, Kamachi M (2003) Three dimensional analysis of temperature and salinity in the equatorial Pacific using a variational method with vertical coupled temperature-salinity empirical orthogonal function modes. J Geophys Res 108:3297. doi:10.1029/2002JC001745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukumori I, Raghunath R, Fu L–L (1998) Nature of global large-scale sea level variability in relation to atmospheric forcing: a modeling study. J Geophys Res 103:5493–5512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greatbatch RJ (1994) A note on the representation on steric sea level in models that conserve volume rather than mass. J Geophys Res 99:12767–12771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirose N, Fukumori I, Zlotnicki V (2001) Modeling the high-frequency barotropic response of the ocean to atmospheric disturbances: sensitivity to forcing, topography, and friction. J Geophys Res 106:30987–30995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, p 996

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii M, Kimoto M (2009) Reevaluation of historical ocean heat content variations with time-varying XBT and MBT depth bias corrections. J Oceanogr 65:287–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii M, Kimoto M, Kachi M (2003) Historical ocean subsurface temperature analysis with error estimates. Mon Weather Rev 131:51–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii M, Kimoto M, Sakamoto K, Iwasaki S (2006) Steric sea level change estimated from historical ocean subsurface temperature and salinity analyses. J Oceanogr 62:155–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuragano T, Kamachi M (2000) Global statistical space-time scales of oceanic variability estimated from the TOPEX/POSEIDON altimeter data. J Geophys Res 105:955–974. doi:10.1029/1999JC900247

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuliette EW, Miller L (2009) Closing the sea level rise budget with altimetry, Argo, and GRACE. Geophys Res Lett 36(4). doi:10.1029/2008GL036010

  • Leuliette EW, Willis JK (2011) Balancing the sea level budget. Oceanography 24(2):122–129. doi:10.5670/oceanog.2011.32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locarnini RA, Mishonov AV, Antonov JI, Boyer TP, Garcia HE, Baranova OK, Zweng MM, Johnson DR (2010) World Ocean Atlas 2009, volume 1: temperature. In: Levitus S (ed) NOAA Atlas NESDIS 68. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, p 184

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorbacher K, Marsland SJ, Church JA, Griffies SM, Stammer D (2012) Rapid barotropic sea level rise from ice sheet melting. J Geophys Res 117:C06003. doi:10.1029/2011JC007733

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller L, Douglas BC (2004) Mass and volume contributions to twentieth-century global sea level rise. Nature 428:406–409. doi:10.1038/nature02309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onogi K, Tsutsui J, Koide H, Sakamoto M, Kobayashi S, Hatsushika H, Matsumoto T, Yamazaki N, Kamahori H, Takahashi K, Kadokura S, Wada K, Kato K, Oyama R, Ose T, Mannoji N, Taira R (2007) The JRA-25 reanalysis. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 85:369–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stammer D (2008) Response of the global ocean to Greenland and Antarctic ice melting. J Geophys Res 113:C06022. doi:10.1029/2006JC004079

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth KE, Fasullo JT, Mackaro J (2011) Atmospheric moisture transports from ocean to land and global energy flows in reanalyses. J Clim 24:4907–4924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsujino H, Nakano H, Motoi T (2008) Mechanism of current through the straits of the Japan Sea: mean state and seasonal variation. J Oceanogr 64:141–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JS, Kraus EB (1967) A one-dimensional model of the seasonal thermocline, I, A laboratory experiment and its interpretation. Tellus 19(1):88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1981) Tenth report of the joint panel on oceanographic tables and standards, Sidney, BC, September 1980. UNESCO Tech Papers Mar Sci 36:25

    Google Scholar 

  • Veronis G, Stommel H (1956) The action of variable wind stresses on a stratified ocean. J Mar Res 15(1):43–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinogradov SV, Ponte RM, Heimbach P, Wunsch C (2008) The mean seasonal cycle in sea level estimated from a data-constrained general circulation model. J Geophys Res 113:C03032. doi:10.1029/2007JC004496

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Research Program on Climate Change Adaptation, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. The SLA dataset (along-track altimeter data) of TOPEX/POSEIDON, Jason-1, -2, ERS-1, -2 and ENVISAT provided by AVISO was used in this study. ETOPO2 Global Gridded 2-min Database is obtained from National Geophysical Data Center, National Ocean and Atmosphere Administration, U.S. Dept. of Commerce (http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/global/etopo2.html). We would like to express special thanks to reviewers of this paper for their valuable comments, which improved our understanding of the physical processes mentioned in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsurane Kuragano.

Appendix

Appendix

Using the hydrostatic equilibrium hypothesis, dp = −ρgdz, the sea surface height (SSH), H act, from the bottom is expressed as

$$ H^{\text{act}} = \int\limits_{{P_{\text{s}} }}^{{P_{\text{b}} }} {\frac{1}{\rho g}} {\text{d}}p = \int\limits_{{\bar{P}_{\text{s}} }}^{{\bar{P}_{\text{b}} }} {\frac{1}{\rho g}} {\text{d}}p + \int\limits_{{\bar{P}_{\text{b}} }}^{{\bar{P}_{\text{b}} + P^{\prime}_{\text{b}} }} {\frac{1}{\rho g}} {\text{d}}p, $$
(9)

where g is the gravity acceleration, ρ the seawater density, and P the pressure. The variables with subscripts ‘b’ and ‘s’ represent the values at ocean bottom and sea surface, respectively. The bar and the prime represent temporal mean and fluctuation from the mean. The surface pressure P S is assumed as a constant value \( \bar{P}_{\text{S}} \) for transformation to the right-hand side. Value of the first term in the right-hand side varies with the density variation, because the density, ρ, is the only variable in this term. The value of the second term varies with variations of the density at the bottom, ρ b, and the bottom pressure, \( P_{\text{b}}^{\prime } \). However, the effect of the density variation is negligible because the density at the bottom scarecely varies. The bottom pressure, \( \bar{P}_{\text{b}} + P_{\text{b}}^{\prime } \), is defined by the mass of the water column. Therefore, the fluctuation of SSH consists of those by density variation and mass variation, and is expressed as

$$ \tilde{H}^{\text{act}} = \tilde{H}^{\text{den}} + \tilde{H}^{\text{mass}} , $$
(10)

where the fluctuations from the temporal mean values, \( \tilde{H}^{\text{den}} \) and \( \tilde{H}^{\text{mass}} \), are expressed as

$$ \tilde{H}^{\text{den}} = \int\limits_{{\bar{P}_{\text{s}} }}^{{\bar{P}_{\text{b}} }} {\frac{1}{\rho g}} {\text{d}}p - \overline{{\int\limits_{{\bar{P}_{\text{s}} }}^{{\bar{P}_{\text{b}} }} {\frac{1}{\rho g}} {\text{d}}p}} , $$
(11)
$$ \tilde{H}^{\text{mass}} = \int\limits_{{\bar{P}_{\text{b}} }}^{{\bar{P}_{\text{b}} + P_{\text{b}}^{\prime } }} {\frac{1}{{\rho_{\text{b}} g}}} {\text{d}}p = \frac{{P_{\text{b}}^{\prime } }}{{\rho_{\text{b}} g}}, $$
(12)

respectively. The transformation to the last term of the Eq. (12) is based on the assumed constant bottom pressure, ρ b.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuragano, T., Fujii, Y., Toyoda, T. et al. Seasonal barotropic sea surface height fluctuation in relation to regional ocean mass variation. J Oceanogr 70, 45–62 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10872-013-0211-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10872-013-0211-7

Keywords

Navigation