Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative Evaluation of C–H···O and C–H···π Intermolecular Interactions in Ethyl-3-benzyl-1-methyl-2-oxoindoline-3-carboxylate and 3-Methyl-but-2-en-1-yl-1,3-dimethyl-2-oxoindoline-3-carboxylate: Insights from PIXEL and Hirshfeld Analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Crystallography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The X-ray crystallographic structures of two biologically active molecules, namely (±)-ethyl-3-benzyl-1-methyl-2-oxoindoline-3-carboxylate (I) and (±)-3-methyl-but-2-en-1-yl-1,3-dimethyl-2-oxoindoline-3-carboxylate (II) have been investigated based on the molecular conformation and supramolecular packing of the molecules in the solid state. These two structures assemble via C–H···O=C and C–H···π intermolecular interactions which contribute towards the stability of the crystal packing. In order to gain quantitative insights into the nature of non-covalent interaction between different molecules the interaction energy of the molecular pairs obtained after analysis of the crystal structures for both the molecules has been performed by using the PIXEL approach along with high level DFT+Disp calculations. Hirshfeld surface analysis and the associated fingerprint plots provide rapid quantitative insight into the intermolecular interactions in molecular solids. This article provides support to the fact that every molecule can be explored in detail for an understanding of its solid state structure via experimental and computational tools in crystal engineering.

Graphical Abstract

This manuscript outlines the significance (nature and energetic) of weak intermolecular interactions in ethyl-3-benzyl-1-methyl-2-oxoindoline-3-carboxylate and 3-methyl-but-2-en-1-yl-1,3-dimethyl-2-oxoindoline-3-carboxylate in the solid state (using PIXEL) and comparison with that in the gas phase (using TURBOMOLE) and their partitioning into coulombic, polarization, dispersive and repulsive components. Furthermore, Hirshfeld surface analysis has also been used to probe such intermolecular interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Scheme 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Scheme 2
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rudrangi SRS, Bontha VK, Manda VR, Bethi S (2011) Asian J Research Chem 4(3):335–338

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vara Prasad, V. N.; Gary, L.; Mikhail, G. US20060229348, 2006

  3. Barbara VS (2008) Chem Soc 19(7):1244–1247

    Google Scholar 

  4. Melvin, J.; Lawrence, S. US19874686224, 1987

  5. Saul, B. K. US19854556672, 1985

  6. Martin, W.; John, J. K. US19794145422, 1979

  7. Goetz, E. H. US19794160032, 1979

  8. He, Y. et al. US20027205328, 2002

  9. Maschio L, Civalleri B, Ugliengo P, Gavezzotti A (2011) J Phys Chem 115:11179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bernardi F, Boys SF (1970) Mol Phys 19:553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Spackman MA, Jayatilaka D (2009) CrystEngComm 11:19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spackman MA, McKinnon JJ (2002) CrystEngComm 4:378–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghosh S, De S, Kakde BN, Bhunia S, Adhikary A, Bisai A (2012) Org Lett 14:5864–5867

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Altomare A, Cascarano G, Giacovazzo C, Guagliardi A (1993) J Appl Crystallogr 26:343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sheldrick GM (1997) SHELXL97, Program for Crystal Structure Refinement. University of Gottingen, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  16. Farrugia LJ (1999) J Appl Cryst 32:837

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sheldrick GM (2008) Acta Crystallogr A 64:112–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Farrugia LJ (1997) J Appl Cryst 30:565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Macrae CF, Bruno IJ, Chisholm JA, Edgington PR, McCabe P, Pidcock E, Rodriguez-Monge L, Taylor R, Streek J, Wood PA (2008) J Appl Cryst 41:466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nardelli M (1995) J Appl Cryst 28:569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Spek AL (2009) Acta Crystallogr D 65:148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dance I (2003) New J Chem 27:22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wolff SK, Grimwood DJ, McKinnon JJ, Turner MJ, Jayatilaka D, Spackman MA. Crystal Explorer (Version 3.0), University of Western Australia, 2012

  24. Ladd MFC, Palmer RA (2003) Structure determination by X-ray crystallography, 4th edn. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publications, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. TURBOMOLE V6.3 2011, a development of University of Karlsruhe and Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH, 1989-2007, TURBOMOLE GmbH

  26. Nishio M (2011) Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:13873–13900

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nishio M (1018) J Mol Struc 2012:2–7

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nishio M, Hirota M, Umezawa Y (1998) The C-H···π interaction, evidence, nature and consequences, Wiley, New York, ch. 5–9

  29. Koellner G, Steiner T, Millard CB, Silman I, Sussman JL (2002) J Mol Biol 320:721–725

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Umezawa Y, Nishio M (2002) Nucleic Acids Res 30:2183–219231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Allen FH (2008) Acta Cryst B 58:380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Streek JVD (2006) Acta Cryst B 62:567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Orpen AG (2002) Acta Cryst B 58:398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Allen FH, Motherwell WDS (2002) Acta Cryst B 58:407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Taylor R (2002) Acta Cryst D 58:879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Aguilar-Martinez M, Bautista-Martinez JA, Macias-Ruvalcaba N, Gonzalez I, Tovar E, Marin del Alizal T, Collera O, Cuevas G (2001) J Org Chem 66:8349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Brondz I, Greibrokk T, Groth PA, Aasen A (1982) J Tetrahedron Lett 23:1299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Fichtler R, Neudorfl J-M, von Wangelin A (2011) J Org Biomol Chem 9:7224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sullivan BW, Faulkner DJ, Okamoto KT, Chen MHM, Clardy J (1986) J Org Chem 51:5134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sopkova-de Oliveira Santos J, Verhaeghe P, Lohier J-F, Rathelot P, Vanelle P, Rault S (2007) Acta Crystallogr C 63:o643–o645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Denmark SE, Baiazitov RY, Nguyen ST (2009) Tetrahedron 65:6535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ding L, Maier A, Fiebig H–H, Gorls H, Lin W-H, Peschel G, Hertweck C (2011) Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 50:1630–1634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Buzas A, Istrate F, Le Goff XF, Odabachian Y, Gagosz F (2009) J Organomet Chem 694:515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Fun H-K, Laphookhieo S, Maneerat W, Chantrapromma S (2007) Acta Crystallogr E63:o3964

    Google Scholar 

  45. Suarez-Castillo OR, Melendez-Rodriguez M, Castelan-Duarte LE, Zuniga-Estrada EA, Cruz-Borbolla J, Morales-Rios MS, Joseph-Nathan P (2011) Tetrahedron 22:2085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Mironova EV, Dzyurkevich MS, Lodochnikova OA, Krivolapov DB, Litvinov IA, Plemenkov VV, Khim ZS (2012) J Struct Chem 53:360

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deepak Chopra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dey, D., Ghosh, S. & Chopra, D. Quantitative Evaluation of C–H···O and C–H···π Intermolecular Interactions in Ethyl-3-benzyl-1-methyl-2-oxoindoline-3-carboxylate and 3-Methyl-but-2-en-1-yl-1,3-dimethyl-2-oxoindoline-3-carboxylate: Insights from PIXEL and Hirshfeld Analysis. J Chem Crystallogr 44, 131–142 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10870-014-0492-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10870-014-0492-8

Keywords

Navigation