Skip to main content
Log in

Are You Gossiping About Me? The Costs and Benefits of High Workplace Gossip Prevalence

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whereas organizational research has historically focused on the negative effects of workplace gossip behaviors, in this paper, we draw on social information processing theory to examine both the benefits and costs of perceived work-related gossip prevalence. On the one hand, we suggest that perceived work-related gossip prevalence is beneficial to employees’ job performance. Employees who perceive work-related gossip prevalence to be high should experience higher levels of performance pressure. Performance pressure, in turn, should be positively associated with higher job performance. At the same time, however, these same employees will also experience lower levels of psychological well-being due to the lack of emotional ties and trusting relationships that they have with co-workers. We furthermore suggest that both the positive and negative effects of perceived work-related gossip prevalence are moderated by the valence of the gossip prevalence, such that employees feel more performance pressure (and, in turn, higher job performance) and experience worse psychological well-being when the valence of their perceived gossip prevalence is negative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Recent research (e.g., Marsh, Lüdtke, Nagengast, Morin, & Von Davier, 2013) has discussed the potential problems of item parceling and cautioned against its use. In this study, however, we deem it appropriate to adopt the parceling technique for three reasons. First, the key prerequisite of using parceling is that “relations among constructs are accurately represented if cross-loadings or correlated uniquenesses are eliminated by parceling” (Marsh et al., 2013, p. 261). This prerequisite concerning the use of parcels versus individual items in structural equation modeling is less relevant in our research, because we adopted a path-analytic approach to hypothesis testing and used item parcels only for confirmatory factor analyses. Second, Marsh et al. (2013, p. 261) stated that “the use of item parcels is only justified when there is good support for the unidimensionality of all the constructs at the item level.” Indeed, all focal variables in this study have been widely conceptualized and measured as unidimensional constructs. Third, statisticians have advocated the use of parceling in case of an item-to-subject ratio lower than 1:10 (Kunce, Cook, & Miller, 1975; Marascuilor & Levin, 1983), as in our research (1:9.5 for study 2 and 1:5.2 for study 3).

References

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the grants funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71572066 and 71832004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pengcheng Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 52 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, N., Yam, K.C., Zhang, P. et al. Are You Gossiping About Me? The Costs and Benefits of High Workplace Gossip Prevalence. J Bus Psychol 36, 417–434 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09683-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09683-7

Keywords

Navigation