Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to explore the role rater and target age play in the evaluations of poorly performing workers. Intergroup attribution theory suggests that rater age predicts the attributions made for the poor performance of older workers.
Design/Methodology/Approach
In this study, 203 supervisors in various industries completed measures of causal attribution and evaluations for a poorly performing hypothetical subordinate.
Findings
Compared to the poor performance of younger targets, the poor performance of older targets was more likely to be attributed to external and controllable causes by older raters and more likely to be attributed to stable causes by younger raters. These attributions predicted willingness to punish and likelihood to provide training.
Implications
Our findings were partially supported by intergroup attribution theory and suggest that this theory may be useful in understanding how older workers’ performance is evaluated.
Originality/Value
This is one of the first studies to utilize intergroup attribution theory among supervisors in exploring how older workers are evaluated in the workplace and to demonstrate that the theory predicts how older workers’ poor performance will be attributed. Our study provides evidence that when evaluating a poorly performing older target, older raters will be more inclined to attribute this performance to controllable causes and thus be more punitive than younger raters. Further, we provide some evidence that raters will be more punitive and less willing to provide training when evaluating poorly performing targets to whom they are similar.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Barak, B. (1987). Cognitive age: A new multidimensional approach to measuring age identity. International Journal of Aging and Development, 25, 109–128.
Blanchard-Fields, F., Baldi, R., & Stein, R. (1999). Age relevance and context effects on attributions across the lifespan. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23, 665–683. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/016502599383748.
Blanchard-Fields, F., Chen, Y., Horhota, M., & Wang, M. (2007). Cross cultural and age differences in the correspondence bias. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 62B, 362–365.
Cherry, K. E., & Brigman, S. (2005). Memory failures appraisal in younger and older adults: Role of individual difference and event outcome variables. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 166, 435–450.
Cleveland, J. N., & Shore, L. M. (1992). Self and supervisory perspectives on age and work attitudes on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 469–484. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.77.4.469.
Cortina, J., Chen, G., & Dunlap, W. P. (2001). Testing interaction effects in LISREL: Examination and illustration of available procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 324–360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810144002.
Cox, C. B., & Beier, M. E. (2011). Supervisors’ actual and relative ages predict performance evaluations via attributions for poor performance. Poster session presented at the Society of Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio.
Dedrick, E. J., & Dobbins, G. H. (1991). The influence of subordinate age on managerial actions: An attributional analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 367–377. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030120502.
Erber, J. T., & Long, B. A. (2006). Perceptions of forgetful and slow employees: Does age matter? Journal of Gerontology, 6, 333–339.
Ferris, G. R., Yates, V. L., Gilmore, D. C., & Rowland, K. M. (1985). The influence of subordinate age on performance ratings and causal attributions. Personnel Psychology, 38, 545–557. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1985.tb00559.x.
Finkelstein, L. M., & Burke, M. J. (1998). Age stereotyping at work: The role of rater and contextual factors on evaluations of job performance. The Journal of General Psychology, 125, 317–345.
Finkelstein, L. M., Burke, M. J., & Raju, N. S. (1995). Age discrimination in simulated employment contexts: An integrative analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 652–663. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.6.652.
Gordon, R. A., & Arvey, R. D. (2004). Age bias in laboratory and field settings: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 468–492. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02557.x.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Hewstone, M. (1990). The “ultimate attribution error”? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 311–335.
Hochwater, W. A., Witt, L. A., Treadway, D. C., & Ferris, G. R. (2005). The interaction of social skill and organizational support on job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 482–489. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.482.
Islam, M. R., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Intergroup attributions and affective consequences in majority and minority groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 936–950. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293196005.
Kite, M. E., Stockdale, G. D., Whitley, B. E., & Johnson, B. T. (2005). Attitudes toward younger and older adults: An updated meta-analytic review. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 241–266. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00404.x.
Kline, R. B. (2004). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614.
McAuley, E., Duncan, T. E., & Russell, D. (1992). Measuring causal attributions: The revised causal dimension scale (CDSII). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 566–573.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, L. K. (1998–2007). Mplus User’s Guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 392–423. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392.
Posthuma, R. A., & Campion, M. A. (2009). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35, 158–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318617.
Rupp, D. E., Vodanovich, S. J., & Crede, M. (2006). Age bias in the workplace: The impact of ageism and causal attributions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1337–1364. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00062.x.
Shore, L. M., Cleveland, J. N., & Goldberg, C. B. (2003). Work attitudes and decisions as a function of manager age and employee age. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 529–537. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.529.
Struthers, C. W., Miller, D. L., Boudens, C. J., & Briggs, G. L. (2001). Effects of causal attributions on coworker interactions: A social motivation perspective. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 169–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/153248301750433560.
Taylor, D. M., & Jaggi, V. (1974). Ethnocentrism and causal attribution in a South Indian context. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5, 162–171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002202217400500202.
Toossi, M. (2007). Labor force projections to 2016: More workers in their golden years. Monthly Labor Review, 33–52.
Weiner, B. (1993). On sin and sickness: A theory of perceived responsibility and social motivation. American Psychologist, 48, 957–965. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.9.957.
Wrenn, K. A., & Maurer, T. J. (2004). Beliefs about older workers’ learning and development behavior in relation to beliefs about malleability of skills, age-related decline, and control. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 223–242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02546.x.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper is based on the first author's dissertation. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2010 Academy of Management Conference in Montreal, Canada. The authors would like to thank Mikki Hebl, David Lane, and Andrew Perkins for their helpful comments and recommendations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cox, C.B., Beier, M.E. Too Old to Train or Reprimand: The Role of Intergroup Attribution Bias in Evaluating Older Workers. J Bus Psychol 29, 61–70 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9297-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9297-6