Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of Organizational Identification and Psychological Safety on Initial Perceptions of Coworker Trustworthiness

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Initial trustworthiness perceptions serve as anchored reference points for subsequent trust perceptions and associated behavioral choices in organizations. Examining the relationship between the employee and the organization is an underexplored influence on such perceptions. This study is an investigation of how perceived psychological safety (PS) in the work environment and level of organizational identification (OI) influence initial perceptions of others’ trustworthiness.

Design/Methodology/Approach

Data were obtained through survey and scenario methods from a sample of high-potential managers (n = 155) during participation in a leadership development training course.

Findings

Results demonstrate that both disposition to trust and PS have positive relationships with initial perceptions of others’ trustworthiness. There is also a significant negative moderating effect of OI on the relationship between psychology safety and perceived trustworthiness. PS has a strong positive significant relationship with initial perceptions of others’ trustworthiness when OI is low. This relationship is non-significant when OI is high.

Implications

This study provides evidence that the relationship between the employee and the organization can influence individual perceptions of initial trustworthiness in others.

Originality/Value

Aspects of the relationship between the trustor and the organization have not previously been considered as influences on initial trustworthiness perceptions. PS, often investigated as a direct influence on learning and performance, has not been previously examined as a socialized influence on trustworthiness perceptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4, 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 1230–1240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34, 325–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barter, C., & Renold, E. (1999). The use of vignettes in qualitative research. In Social research update. Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, England. Issue 25, http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU25.html.

  • Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2005). Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 373–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bstieler, L., & Hemmert, M. (2010). Increasing learning and time efficiency in interorganizational new product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(4), 485–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, A., Brueller, D., & Dutton, J. (2009). Learning behaviours in the workplace: The role of high-quality interpersonal relationships and psychological safety. Systems Research & Behavioral Science, 26(1), 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J., Scott, B., & LePine, J. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909–927.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K., Yamagishi, T., Cheshire, C., Cooper, R., Matsuda, M., & Mashima, R. (2005). Trust building via risk taking: A cross-societal experiment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(2), 121–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creed, W. E. D., & Miles, R. E. (1996). Trust in organizations: A conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and opportunity costs of controls. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 51–67). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 504–553). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A., & Rothstein, H. (2006). The effects of the perceived behavioral integrity of managers on employee attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 407–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis-Blake, A., & Pfeffer, J. (1989). Just a mirage: The search for dispositional effects in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 203–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for organizational research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611–628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K. T., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2004). Trust in leaders: Existing research and emerging issues. In R. M. Kramer & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches (pp. 21–40). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukerich, J. M., Kramer, R., & McLean Parks, J. (1998). The dark side of organizational identification. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations (pp. 245–256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. (2002). The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations. Organization Science, 13, 128–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1419–1452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. (2004). Psychological safety, trust and learning: A group-level lens. In R. M. Kramer & K. Cook (Eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches (pp. 239–272). New York: The Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A., & Woolley, A. (2003). Understanding outcomes of organizational learning interventions. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. Lyles (Eds.), International handbook on organizational learning and knowledge management. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellemers, N., De Gilder, D., & Haslam, S. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work—A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 459–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K. D. (2004). Managing images of trustworthiness in organizations. In R. M. Kramer & K. Cook (Eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches (pp. 275–292). New York: The Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K., & Elofson, G. (2000). How the packaging of decision explanations affects perceptions of trustworthiness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris, G., Senner, E., & Butterfield, D. (1973). Trust, culture and organizational behavior. Industrial Relations, 12, 144–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. C. (1981). The multiple socialization of organization members. Academy of Management Review, 6, 309–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrin, D. L., Bligh, M. C., & Kohles, J. C. (2007). Can I trust you to trust me? A theory of trust, monitoring and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships. Group & Organization Management, 32, 465–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. (1987). The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology, 21, 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, F., & Tropp, L. (2006). Being seen as individuals versus as group members: Extending research on metaperception to intergroup contexts. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 265–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabarro, J. (1978). The development of trust, influence, and expectations. In A. G. Athos & J. J. Gabarro (Eds.), Interpersonal behavior: Communication and understanding in relationships (pp. 290–303). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. T. (1998). Ordinary personology. In Handbook of social psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, H., Boies, K., Finegan, J. E., & McNally, J. (2005). Antecedents of trust: Establishing a boundary condition for the relation between propensity to trust and intention to trust. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(3), 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. London: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D. L., Grubb, P. D., Acorn, D. A., Trolier, T. K., & Carpenter, S. (1990). Attribution difficulty and memory for attribution-relevant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 891–898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harquail, C. V. (1998). Organizational identification and the “whole person”: Integrating affect, behavior, and cognition. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations (pp. 223–231). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Postmes, T., Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Webley, P. (2006). Sticking to our guns: Social identity as a basis for the maintenance of commitment to faltering organizational projects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 607–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., & Hardie, E. A. (1992). Prototypicality, conformity and depersonalized attraction: A self-categorization analysis of group cohesiveness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., Hardie, E. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (1995). Prototypical similarity, self-categorization, and depersonalized attraction: A perspective on group cohesiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 159–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. G. (1991). Trust and the appraisal process in close relationships. In W. H. Jones & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 2). London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, Shane, & Herold, (1996). Rumors of the death of dispositional research are vastly exaggerated. Academy of Management Review, 21, 203–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-George, C., & Swap, W. (1982). Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(6), 1306–1317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jokisaari, M., & Nurmi, J. (2009). Change in newcomers’ supervisor support and socialization outcomes after organizational entry. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 527–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219–266). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., Farina, A., Hastorf, A. H., Markus, H., Miller, D. T., & Scott, R. A. (1984). Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kark, R., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Alive and creating: The mediating role of vitality and aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work involvement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6), 785–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1971). Attribution in social interaction. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valims, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 1–26). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, P. H., Dirks, K. T., Cooper, C. D., & Ferrin, D. L. (2006). When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based trust violation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallett, R., Wilson, T., & Gilbert, D. (2008). Expect the unexpected: Failure to anticipate similarities leads to an intergroup forecasting error. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 265–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2005). The logic of appropriateness. In M. Rein, M. Moran, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The oxford handbook of public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1990). Deconstructing organizational behavior taboos: The suppressions of gender conflict in organizations. Organization Science, 1, 339–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1994). The organization of exclusion: Institutionalization of sex inequality, gendered faculty jobs and gendered knowledge in organizational theory and research. Organization, 1, 401–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (2000). Hidden gendered assumptions in mainstream organizational theory and research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9, 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integration model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R., & Gavin, M. (2005). Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss? Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 874–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, D., Cummings, L., & Chervany, N. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain, D., & Hackman, K. (1999). Trust, risk, and decision-making in organizational change. Public Administration Quarterly, 23(2), 152–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson, D. (1998). Feeling stressed and burned out: A feminist reading and re-visioning of stressed-based emotions within medicine and organization science. Organization Science, 9, 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166–195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Montes, S. D., & Zweig, D. (2009). Do promises matter? An exploration of the role of promises in psychological contract breach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1243–1260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. A. (2009). Workplace expression of emotions and escalation of commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 2396–2424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-report in organizational research: problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. G. (1998). To be or not to be? Central questions in organizational identification. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations (pp. 171–207). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quattrone, G. A. (1982). Over attribution and unit formation: When behavior engulfs the person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 593–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riantoputra, D. (2010). Know thyself: Examining factors that influence the activation of organizational identity concepts in top managers’ minds. Group & Organization Management, 35, 8–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, A. W., West, M. A., Van Dick, R., & Dawson, J. F. (2006). Boundary spanners’ identification, intergroup contact, and effective intergroup relations. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1252–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S., & Rousseau, D. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3), 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roussin, C. J. (2008). Increasing trust, psychological safety, and team performance through dyadic leadership discovery. Small Group Research, 39(2), 224–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1978). Career dynamics: Matching individuals and organizational needs. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E., & Bennis, W. (1965). Personal and organizational change through group methods. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoorman, F., Mayer, R., & Davis, J. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seijts, G., & Yip, J. (2008). The effect of knowledge accumulation on support for workplace accommodation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 4(22), 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serva, M., & Fuller, M. (2004). The effects of trustworthiness perceptions on the formation of initial trust: Implications for MIS student teams. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(4), 383–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T. (2002). Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13(1), 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sluss, D., Klimchak, M., & Holmes, J. (2008). Perceived organizational support as a mediator between relational exchange and organizational identification. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(3), 457–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrowe, R. T., & Liden, R. C. (2005). Two routes to influence: Integrating leader-member exchange and network perspectives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 505–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolte, J. F. (1994). The context of satisfying in vignette research. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 727–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93, 239–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich, J., van Dick, R., & Christ, O. (2009). Substitutes for procedural fairness: Prototypical leaders are endorsed whether they are fair or not. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 235–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1275–1286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webber, S. S. (2008). Development of cognitive and affective trust in teams: A longitudinal study. Small Group Research, 39(6), 746–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Management & Entrepreneurship Department, Suffolk University, Sawyer School of Business, 8 Ashburton Place, Boston, MA, 02108, USA

    Christopher Jay Roussin & Sheila Simsarian Webber

Authors
  1. Christopher Jay Roussin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sheila Simsarian Webber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Jay Roussin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roussin, C.J., Webber, S.S. Impact of Organizational Identification and Psychological Safety on Initial Perceptions of Coworker Trustworthiness. J Bus Psychol 27, 317–329 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9245-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9245-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation