Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Pay Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Turnover Intentions: A Two-Sample Study

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a two-sample study—a sample of medical reps from pharmaceutical companies (N = 232) and a sample of respondents from multiple organizations (N = 221)—of the relationships between pay satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intentions. Hypotheses were tested using a multidimensional perspective on both pay satisfaction and organizational commitment. Results from both samples show that the effect of pay satisfaction on intended turnover is fully mediated by affective commitment and perceived sacrifice commitment. Pay satisfaction is also significantly related to normative commitment but the latter has no influence on the outcome. Finally, in the sample of medical reps, pay satisfaction significantly reduces commitment based on lack of employment alternatives, a finding that is interpreted in light of the characteristics of pay systems in pharmaceutical companies. Future directions on compensation satisfaction and commitment research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, D. G., & Griffeth, R. W. (2001). Test of a mediated performance-turnover relationship highlighting the moderating roles of visibility and reward contingency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1014–1021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, T. E. (1992). Foci and bases of commitment: Are they distinctions worth making? Academy of Management Journal, 35, 232–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentein, K., Vandenberg, R. J., Vandenberghe, C., & Stinglhamber, F. (2005). The role of change in the relationship between commitment and turnover: A latent growth modeling approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 468–482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 398–444). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equations models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraher, S. M., & Buckley, M. R. (1996). Cognitive complexity and the perceived dimensionality of pay satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currall, S. C., Towler, A. J., Judge, T. A., & Kohn, L. (2005). Pay satisfaction and organizational outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 58, 613–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dailey, R. C., & Kirk, D. J. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as antecedents of job dissatisfaction and intent to turnover. Human Relations, 45, 305–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeConinck, J. B., & Stilwell, C. D. (2004). Incorporating organizational justice, role states, pay satisfaction and supervisor satisfaction in a model of turnover intentions. Journal of Business Research, 57, 225–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeConinck, J. B., Stilwell, C. D., & Brock, B. A. (1996). A construct validity analysis of scores on measures of distributive justice and pay satisfaction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 1026–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulebohn, J. H., & Martocchio, J. J. (1998). Employee perceptions of the fairness of work group incentive pay plans. Journal of Management, 24, 469–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, R. B., Grube, J. A., & Castañeda, M. B. (1994). Organizational commitment: The utility of an integrative definition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 370–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gakovic, A., & Tetrick, L. E. (2003). Perceived organizational support and work status: A comparison of the employment relationships of part-time and full-time employees attending university classes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 649–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, D. G., Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). The effects of pay level on organization-based self-esteem and performance: A field study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhart, B., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Compensation: Theory, evidence, and strategic implications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 389–435). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, R. D., Bycio, P., & Hausdorf, P. A. (1994). Further assessments of Meyer and Allen’s (1991) model of organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneman, H. G., & Judge, T. A. (2000). Incentives and motivation. In S. Rynes & B. Gerhart (Eds.), Compensation in organizations: Progress and prospects (pp. 61–103). San Francisco, CA: New Lexington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneman, H. G., & Schwab, D. P. (1985). Pay satisfaction: Its multidimensional nature and measurement. International Journal of Psychology, 20, 129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneman, R. L., Greenberger, D. B., & Strasser, S. (1988). The relationship between pay-for-performance perceptions and pay satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 41, 745–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaros, S. J. (1997). An assessment of Meyer and Allen’s (1991) three-component model of organizational commitment and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 319–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D, Du Toit, S., & Du Toit, M. (2001). LISREL 8: New statistical features. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A. (1993). Validity of the dimensions of the Pay Satisfaction Questionnaire: Evidence of differential prediction. Personnel Psychology, 46, 331–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Welbourne, T. M. (1994). A confirmatory investigation of the dimensionality of the pay satisfaction questionnaire. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 461–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko, J.-W., Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1997). Assessment of Meyer and Allen’s three-component model of organizational commitment in South Korea. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 961–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuvaas, B. (2006). Work performance, affective commitment, and work motivation: The roles of pay administration and pay level. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 365–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, S. S. K. (1998). A validity study of the Pay Satisfaction Questionnaire in Hong Kong. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 124–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, L. P., Roberts, J. A., & Chonko, L. B. (1995). Perceptions of internal and external equity as predictors of outside salespeople’s job satisfaction. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 15, 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lum, L., Kervin, J., Clark, C., Reid, F., & Sirola, W. (1998). Explaining nursing turnover intent: Job satisfaction, pay satisfaction, or organizational commitment? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 2, 171–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, G. W., & Ford, R. C. (1987). Two (or more?) dimensions of organizational commitment: Reexamination of the Affective and Continuance Commitment Scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 638–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Gellatly, I. R. (1990). Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Evaluation of measures and analysis of concurrent and time-lagged relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 710–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 299–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milkovich G. M., & Newman, J. M. (2004). Compensation (8th edn.). Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin Mc Graw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mobley, W. H., Griffeth, R. W., Hand, H. H., & Meglino, B. M. (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 493–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motowidlo, S. J. (1983). Predicting sales turnover from pay satisfaction and expectation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 484–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, P. W., Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1992). The Pay Satisfaction Questionnaire: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 139–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orpen, C., & Bonnici, J. (1987). A factor analysis investigation of the Pay Satisfaction Questionnaire. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 391–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1973). Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 151–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarpello, V., Huber, V., & Vandenberg, R. J. (1988). Compensation satisfaction: Its measurement and dimensionality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., Jenkins, G. D., & Gupta, N. (1999). Positive and negative affect, signal sensitivity, and pay satisfaction. Journal of Management, 25, 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, M. E. (1987). Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somers, M. J. (1993). A test of the relationship between affective and continuance commitment using non-recursive models. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 185–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinglhamber, F., Bentein, K., & Vandenberghe, C. (2002). Extension of the three-component model of commitment to five foci: Development of measures and substantive test. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekleab, A. G., Bartol, K. M., & Liu, W. (2005). Is it pay levels or pay raises that matter to fairness and turnover? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 899–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46, 259–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, M., Sire, B., & Balkin, D. B. (2000). The role of organizational justice in pay and employee benefits satisfaction, and its effects on work attitudes. Group and Organization Management, 25, 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevor, C. O., Gerhart, B., & Boudreau, J. W. (1997). Voluntary turnover and job performance: Curvilinearity and the moderating influences of salary growth and promotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 44–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberghe, C., Stordeur, S., & D’hoore, W. (2002). Transactional and transformational leadership in nursing: Structural validity and substantive relationships. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1034–1046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. L., Malos, S. B., & Palmer, D. K. (2002). Benefit system and benefit level satisfaction: An expanded model of antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management, 28, 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. L., McDaniel, M. A., & Nguyen, N. T. (2006). A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of pay level satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 392–413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. École des Hautes Études Commerciales, 3000, Chemin de la Côte Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3T 2A7

    Christian Vandenberghe & Michel Tremblay

Authors
  1. Christian Vandenberghe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michel Tremblay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Vandenberghe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vandenberghe, C., Tremblay, M. The Role of Pay Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Turnover Intentions: A Two-Sample Study. J Bus Psychol 22, 275–286 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-008-9063-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-008-9063-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation