Skip to main content
Log in

Perceived size of friends and weight evaluation among low-income adolescents

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drawing from social comparison theory, we examine how perceptions of friends’ body sizes may influence adolescents’ subjective evaluations of their own body (e.g., how accurate they are in judging their weight, how much body dissatisfaction they feel), particularly for adolescent females. Participants were low-income, minority adolescents (Study 1: N = 194 females, Mean age = 15.4; Study 2: N = 409 males and females; Mean age = 14.9). Adolescents used figure rating scales to indicate their perceived size and that of four of their closest friends and completed several measures of subjective weight evaluation (e.g., weight classification, body dissatisfaction, internalized weight bias). In both studies, how adolescents perceived their body size and the body sizes of their thinnest and heaviest friends were positively correlated. In Study 1, overweight females based on measured BMI were less likely to accurately judge themselves as overweight if they had a close friend they perceived as heavy. In addition, females who viewed themselves as having a larger figure reported more internalized weight bias when they had friends they viewed as relatively thin. Findings from Study 2 suggest that how friends’ bodies are perceived is predictive of subjective weight evaluation measures only for adolescent females. Programs that address negative aspects of social comparison may be important in preventing both obesity and eating disorder symptoms in adolescent females.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We considered other metrics, such as the mean of the friend group size. We used the thinnest and heaviest friend rating because means can obscure within group differences, and because people compare themselves to specific individuals (i.e., social comparison Festinge, 1954).

References

  • Acker, J. C. (2013). Evidence and implications of weight clustering among adolescents (unpublished master’s thesis). Storrs, Connecticut: University of Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, M. M., Amialchuk, A., & Renna, F. (2011). Social network and weight misperception among adolescents. Southern Economic Journal, 77, 827–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. I., Evans, A. E., Mirchandani, G. G., Kelder, S. H., & Hoelscher, D. M. (2010). Observable weight distributions and children’s individual weight assessment. Obesity, 18, 202–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Budd, G. M., & Hayman, L. L. (2008). Addressing the childhood obesity crisis: A call to action. MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 33, 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, M. A., Heiland, F. W., & Nadler, C. M. (2010). From ‘overweight’ to ‘about right’: Evidence of a generational shift in body weight norms. Obesity, 18, 1226–1234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash, T. F. (1994). The Multidimensional Body Self Relations Questionnaire user’s manual. Norfolk, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazzato, V., Mian, E., Serino, A., Mele, S., & Urgesi, C. (2015). Distinct contributions of extrastriate body area and temporoparietal junction in perceiving one’s own and others’ body. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15, 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). Questionnaires and item rationales. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/yrbs/questionnaire_rationale.htm

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Body mass index. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/index.html

  • Clark, A. E., & Loheac, Y. (2007). “It wasn’t me, it was them!” Social influence in risky behavior by adolescents. Journal of Health Economics, 26, 763–784.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, S. A., Vaquera, E., Maturo, C. C., & Narayan, K. V. (2012). Is there evidence that friends influence body weight? A systematic review of empirical research. Social Science & Medicine, 75, 1175–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Haye, K., Robins, G., Mohr, P., & Wilson, C. (2011). Homophily and contagion as explanations for weight similarities among adolescent friends. Journal of Adolescent Health, 49, 421–427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durso, L. E., & Latner, J. D. (2008). Understanding self-directed stigma: Development of the weight bias internalization scale. Obesity, 16, S80–S86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons-Craft, E. E., Harney, M. B., Brownstone, L. M., Higgins, M. K., & Bardone-Cone, A. M. (2012). Examining social physique anxiety and disordered eating in college women. The roles of social comparison and body surveillance. Appetite, 59, 796–805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. M. (2011). Perceptual measures of body image for adolescents and adults. In T. F. Cash & L. Smolak (Eds.), Body image: A handbook of science, practice, and prevention (2nd ed., pp. 146–153). New York, NY, USA: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebl, M. R., & Mannix, L. M. (2003). The weight of obesity in evaluating others: A mere proximity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 28–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hruschka, D. J., Brewis, A. A., Wutich, A., & Morin, B. (2011). Shared norms and their explanation for the social clustering of obesity. American Journal of Public Health, 101, S295–S300.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S., Mezulis, A. H., & Abramson, L. Y. (2008). The ABCs of depression: Integrating affective, biological, and cognitive models to explain the emergence of the gender difference in depression. Psychological Review, 115, 291–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. (2001). Social comparison and body image: Attractiveness comparisons to models and peers among adolescent girls and boys. Sex Roles, 45, 645–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khambalia, A., Hardy, L. L., & Bauman, A. (2012). Accuracy of weight perception, lifestyle behaviours and psychological distress among overweight and obese adolescents. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 48, 220–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laird, R., & Weems, C. (2011). The equivalence of regression models using difference scores and models using separate scores for each informant: implications for the study of informant discrepancies. Psychological Assessment, 23, 388–397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lanza, H., Echols, L., & Graham, S. (2013). Deviating from the norm: Body mass index (BMI) differences and psychosocial adjustment among early adolescent girls. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 38, 376–386.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Latner, J. D., Stunkard, A. J., & Wilson, G. (2005). Stigmatized students: Age, sex, and ethnicity effects in the stigmatization of obesity. Obesity Research, 13, 1226–1231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leahey, T. M., LaRose, J., Fava, J. L., & Wing, R. R. (2011). Social influences are associated with BMI and weight loss intentions in young adults. Obesity, 19, 1157–1162.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. M., & Steinberg, L. (2009). Handbook of adolescent psychology, Vol 2: Contextual influences on adolescent development (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lew, A., Mann, T., Myers, H., Taylor, S., & Bower, J. (2007). Thin-ideal media and women’s body dissatisfaction: Prevention using downward social comparisons on non-appearance dimensions. Sex Roles, 57, 543–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, T. E., Lewis, B., Kinney, L., & Murphy, P. (2012). Explicit weight stereotypes are curvilinear: Biased judgments of thin and overweight targets. European Eating Disorders Review, 20, 151–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maximova, K. K., McGrath, J. J., Barnett, T. T., O’Loughlin, J. J., Paradis, G. G., & Lambert, M. M. (2008). Do you see what I see? Weight status misperception and exposure to obesity among children and adolescents. International Journal of Obesity, 32, 1008–1015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, A. S., Pearson, J., Muller, C., Frank, K., & Turner, A. (2010). Sizing up peers: Adolescent girls’ weight control and social comparison in the school context. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51, 64–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, T. A., & Crowther, J. H. (2009). Social comparison as a predictor of body dissatisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 683–698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, C. L., Carroll, M. D., Kit, B. K., & Flegal, K. M. (2010). Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. Journal of the American Medical Association, 311, 806–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, J. M., Wesley Perkins, H. H., & Craig, D. W. (2014). Misperception of peer weight norms and its association with overweight and underweight status among adolescents. Prevention Science, 16, 70–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puhl, R. M., Luedicke, J., & Heuer, C. (2011). Weight-based victimization toward overweight adolescents: Observations and reactions of peers. Journal of School Health, 81, 696–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rancourt, D., Leahey, T. M., LaRose, J. G., & Crowther, J. H. (2015). Effects of weight-focused social comparisons on diet and activity outcomes in overweight and obese young women. Obesity, 23, 85–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, W. (2000). Adolescent psychopathology scale-short form: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpkins, S. D., Schaefer, D. R., Price, C. D., & Vest, A. E. (2013). Adolescent friendships, BMI, and physical activity: Untangling selection and influence through longitudinal social network analysis. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 537–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stunkard, A. J., Sorensen, T., & Schulsinger, F. (1983). Use of the Danish adoption register for the study of obesity and thinness. In S. S. Kety, L. P. Rowland, R. L. Sidman, & S. W. Matthysse (Eds.), The genetics of neurological and psychiatric disorders (pp. 115–120). New York: Raven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trasande, L., & Chatterjee, S. (2009). The impact of obesity on health service utilization and costs in childhood. Obesity, 17, 1749–1754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wasilenko, K., Kulik, J., & Wanic, R. (2007). Effects of social comparisons with peers on women’s body satisfaction and exercise behavior. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 740–745.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted with support to the second author from National Institute of Health (R21HDO65185).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenna C. Ramirez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Jenna C. Ramirez and Stephanie Milan declare they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights and informed consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramirez, J.C., Milan, S. Perceived size of friends and weight evaluation among low-income adolescents. J Behav Med 39, 334–345 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-015-9682-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-015-9682-x

Keywords

Navigation