Skip to main content
Log in

Decentering, rumination, cognitive defusion, and psychological flexibility in people with chronic pain

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The psychological flexibility model appears to be useful for organizing research into chronic pain. One component of the model is called “cognitive defusion.” A process referred to as decentering, measured by the Experiences Questionnaire (EQ), appears similar to cognitive defusion. The purpose of this study is to extend previous investigations of the EQ, to evaluate its factor structure, and examine both indirect and direct roles for decentering in relation to key clinical outcomes. 352 people seeking pain treatment participated in this study. All completed the EQ and standard measures of daily functioning, including emotional functioning. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation models (SEMs) were utilized to examine the factor structure of the EQ and evaluate the role of decentering in relation to outcomes. In CFA the overall fit of the EQ items to a two-factor model, specifying decentering and rumination factors, was poor. Separate models of decentering (a higher order model consisting of two sub-factors; cognitive defusion and self-a-context) and rumination, including reduced item sets, yielded good statistical fits. Analyses of these factors showed expected relations with emotional and social functioning but not with physical functioning. SEM revealed that both decentering and rumination have direct effects on functioning and indirect effects through measures of acceptance. A shortened 12-item measure of decentering warrants further study. Combined models of acceptance and the type of cognitive-defusion-related process reflected in decentering may improve our understanding social and emotional functioning in relation to chronic pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bendayan, R., Esteve, R., & Blanca, M. J. (2012). New empirical evidence of the validity of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire: The differential influence of activity engagement and pain willingness on adjustment to chronic pain. British Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 314–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernini, O., Pennato, T., Cosci, F., & Berrocal, C. (2010). The psychometric properties of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire in Italian patients with chronic pain. Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 1236–1245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., et al. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42, 676–688.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 35–57). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buenaver, L. F., Quartana, P. J., Grace, E. G., Sarlani, E., Simango, M., et al. (2012). Evidence for indirect effects of pain catastrophizing on clinical pain among myofascial temporomandibular disorder participants: The mediating role of sleep disturbance. Pain, 153, 1159–1166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fish, R. A., McGuire, B., Hogan, M., Morrison, T. G., & Stewart, I. (2010). Validation of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) in an Internet sample and development and preliminary validation of the CPAQ-8. Pain, 149, 435–443.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, E. M., Herbert, J. D., Juarascio, A. S., Yeomans, P. D., Zebell, J. A., et al. (2012). The Drexel Defusion Scale: A new measure of experiential distancing. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 1, 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fresco, D. M., Moore, M. T., van Dulmen, M. H., Segal, Z. V., Ma, S. H., et al. (2007). Initial psychometric properties of the experiences questionnaire: Validation of a self-report measure of decentering. Behavior Therapy, 38, 234–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillanders, D. T., Bolderston, H., Bond, F. W., Dempster, M., Flaxman, P. E., et al. (2014). The development and initial validation of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire. Behavior Therapy, 45, 83–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2013). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., et al. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. Psychological Record, 54, 553–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cuttoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 865–878.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (2007). Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 1–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 606–613.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, L. M. (1998). Learning to live with the pain: Acceptance of pain predicts adjustment in persons with chronic pain. Pain, 74, 21–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, L. M. (2011). Fad, fashion and forward progress in psychological approaches to chronic pain management. Pain Management, 1, 491–493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, L. M. (2013). Committed action: An application of the psychological flexibility model to activity patterns in chronic pain. The Journal of Pain, 14, 828–835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, L. M., DaSilva, P., Skillicorn, B., & Doherty, R. (2013a). The Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire: A preliminary study of psychometric properties and prediction of functioning in chronic pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain,. doi:10.1097/AJP.0000000000000047

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, L. M., Gauntlett-Gilbert, J., & Vowles, K. E. (2007). The role of mindfulness in a contextual cognitive-behavioral analysis of chronic pain-related suffering and disability. Pain, 131, 63–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, L. M., & Gutierrez-Martinez, O. (2011). Processes of change in psychological flexibility in an interdisciplinary group-based treatment for chronic pain based on acceptance and commitment therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49, 267–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, L. M., Gutierrez-Martinez, O., & Smyth, C. (2013b). “Decentering” reflects psychological flexibility in people with chronic pain and correlates with their quality of functioning. Health Psychology, 32, 820–823.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, L. M., & Morley, S. (2014). The psychological flexibility model: A basis for integration and progress in psychological approaches to chronic pain management. The Journal of Pain, 15, 221–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, L., & Thompson, M. (2009). Components of mindfulness in patients with chronic pain. Journal Psychopathology and Behavior Assessment, 31, 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, L. M., & Vowles, K. E. (2008). A prospective analysis of acceptance of pain and values-based action in patients with chronic pain. Health Psychology, 27, 215–220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, L. M., Vowles, K. E., & Eccleston, C. (2004). Acceptance of chronic pain: Component analysis and a revised assessment method. Pain, 107, 159–166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, L. M., & Yang, S. Y. (2006). The role of values in a contextual cognitive-behavioral approach to chronic pain. Pain, 123, 137–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, S., & Keefe, F. J. (2007). Getting a handle on process and change in CBT for chronic pain. Pain, 127, 197–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus version 7. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 400–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, T., Anwar, S., McCracken, L., McGregor, A., Graham, L., et al. (2013). Testing the credibility, feasibility and acceptability of an optimised behavioural intervention (OBI) for avoidant chronic low back pain patients: Protocol for a randomised feasibility study. Trials, 14, 172.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reneman, M. F., Dijkstra, A., Geertzen, J. H., & Dijkstra, P. U. (2010). Psychometric properties of Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaires: A systematic review. European Journal of Pain, 14, 457–465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodero, B., Casanueva, B., Luciano, J. V., Gili, M., Serrano-Blanco, A., & Garcia-Campayo, J. (2011). Relationship between behavioural coping strategies and acceptance in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: Elucidating targets of interventions. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 12, 143.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Safran, J. D., & Segal, Z. V. (1990). Interpersonal process in cognitive therapy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. J., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. (1995). The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 7, 524–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. J., Stanish, W., Waite, H., Sullivan, M., & Tripp, D. A. (1998). Catastrophizing, pain, and disability in patients with soft-tissue injuries. Pain, 77, 253–260.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trompetter, H. R., Ten Klooster, P. M., Schreurs, K. M., Fledderus, M., Westerhof, G. J., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2013). Measuring values and committed action with the Engaged Living Scale (ELS): Psychometric evaluation in a nonclinical sample and a chronic pain sample. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1235–1246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Twohig, M. P. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Introduction. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 19, 499–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vowles, K. E., McCracken, L. M., McLeod, C., & Eccleston, C. (2008). The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire: Confirmatory factor analysis and identification of patient subgroups. Pain, 140, 284–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J. E., Jr, & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandeck, B. (1993). SF-32 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: Nimrod Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicksell, R. K., Olsson, G. L., & Melin, L. (2009). The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ)—Further validation including a confirmatory factor analysis and a comparison with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia. European Journal of Pain, 13, 760–768.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. C., Eccleston, C., & Morley, S. (2012). Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 11, CD007407.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Lance M. McCracken, Estelle Barker and Joseph Chilcot declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lance M. McCracken.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McCracken, L.M., Barker, E. & Chilcot, J. Decentering, rumination, cognitive defusion, and psychological flexibility in people with chronic pain. J Behav Med 37, 1215–1225 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-014-9570-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-014-9570-9

Keywords

Navigation