Abstract
Graphing is a complex and critical skill for behavior analysts. We evaluated the effects of conceptual training modules and feedback checklists on verbal behavior about graphing conventions and adherence to graphing conventions with graduate students in behavior analysis. In Experiment 1, conceptual training increased the accuracy of verbal behavior, though both participants achieved criterion in the absence of instruction for some verbal behavior. When graphing adherence did not meet criterion, feedback checklists were implemented that resulted in criterion performance. In Experiment 2, checklists were provided as the primary intervention. Two out of four participants reached criterion for graphing adherence and verbal behavior with this intervention alone, while the remaining two participants reached criterion after a combination of checklists and conceptual training. This evaluation highlights the utility of a sequential approach to training the component skills of a complex repertoire while assessing conceptual behavior and extension of skill acquisition of the individual learner.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Applied behavior analysis international. (2022). Verified course sequence program. Retrieved from https://www.abainternational.org/vcs/bacb.aspx.
Barton, E. E., & Reichow, B. (2012). Guidelines for graphing data with Microsoft® Office 2007™, Office 2010™, and Office for Mac™ 2008 and 2011. Journal of Early Intervention, 34(3), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815112456601
Berkman, S. J., Roscoe, E. M., & Bourret, J. C. (2018). Comparing self-directed methods for training staff to create graphs using graphpad prism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52, 188–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.522
Bernstein, D. J., & Chase, P. N. (2013). Contributions of behavior analysis to higher education. In G. Madden (Ed.), APA Handbook of Behavior Analysis (pp. 523–543). APA.
Behavior analyst certification board. (2017). BCBA task list (5th ed.). Littleton, CO. Author.
Carter, M. (2009). Effects of graphing conventions and response options on interpretation of small n graphs. Educational Psychology, 29(6), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903204315
Chase, P. N. (2014). Gathering evidence for distance education. Acta De Investigacion Psicologica, 4(3), 1657–1672.
Dart, E. H., & Radley, K. C. (2017). The impact of ordinate scaling on visual analysis of single-case data. Journal of School Psychology, 63, 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.03.008
Deochand, N. (2017). Automating phase change lines and their labels using Microsoft Excel®. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 10(3), 279–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0169-1
Dixon, M. R., Jackson, J. W., Small, S. L., Horner-King, M. J., Lik, N. M., Garcia, Y., & Rosales, R. (2009). Creating single-subject design graphs in Microsoft excel 2007. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-277
Dubuque, E. M. (2015). Inserting phase change lines into Microsoft excel® graphs. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8(2), 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0078-8
Ellis, H. C. (1965). The transfer of learning. Macmillan.
Holland, J. G., & Skinner, B. F. (1961). The analysis of behavior: A program for self-instruction. McGraw-Hill.
Keller, F. S., & Schoenfeld, W. N. (1950). Century psychology series. Principles of psychology: A systematic text in the science of behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Keller, F. S. (1968). Goodbye teacher. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1968.1-79
Kieta, A. R., Cihon, T. M., & Abdel-Jalil, A. (2019). Problem solving from a behavior analytic perspective: Implications for behavior analysts and educators. Journal of Behavioral Education, 28, 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9296-9
Kranak, M. P., Shapiro, M. N., Sawyer, M. R., Deochand, N., & Neef, N. A. (2018). Using behavioral skills training to improve graduate students’ graphing skills research and practice. Behavior Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000131
Kranak, M. P., & Mitteer, D. R. (2022). A concise review of recent advancements in the graphical training of behavior analysts. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 55(4), 1349–1354. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.943
Kubina, R. M., Kostewicz, D. E., Brennan, K. M., & King, S. A. (2017). A critical review of line graphs in behavior analytic journals. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9339-x
Kubina, R. M., Kostewicz, D. E., King, S. A., Brennan, K. M., Wertalik, J., Rizzo, K., & Markelz, A. (2021). Standards of graph construction in special education research: A review of their use and relevance. Education and Treatment of Children, 44, 270–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-021-00053-3
Ledford, J. R., Barton, E. E., Severini, K. E., Zimmerman, K. N., & Pokorski, E. A. (2019). Visual display of graphic data in single case design studies: A systematic review and expert preference analysis. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 54(4), 315–327.
LeHardy, R. K., Luczynski, K. C., Hood, S. A., & McKeown, C. A. (2021). Remote teaching of publication-quality, single-case graphs in Microsoft Excel. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 54, 1265–1280. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.805
Mager, R. E., & Pipe, P. (1984). Analyzing performance problems, or you really oughta wanna. Pitman Management and Training.
Michael, J. (1985). Two kinds of verbal behavior plus a possible third. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 3, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392802
Miguel, C. F. (2018). Problem-solving, bidirectional naming, and the development of verbal repertoires. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(4), 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000110
Miller, L. K., & Weaver, F. H. (1972). A multiple baseline achievement test. In G. Semb (Ed.), Behavior analysis and education (pp. 393–399). University of Kansas.
Mitteer, D. R., Greer, B. D., Fisher, W. W., & Cohrs, V. L. (2018). Teaching behavior technicians to create publication-quality, single-case design graphs in GraphPad Prism 7. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51, 998–1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.483
Mouzakitis, A., Codding, R. S., & Tryon, G. (2015). The effects of self-monitoring and performance feedback on the treatment integrity of behavior intervention plan implementation and generalization. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17(4), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715573629
O’Neill, R. E. (1990). Establishing verbal repertoires: Toward the application of general case analysis and programming. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392852
Petscher, E. S., & Bailey, J. S. (2006). Effects of training, prompting, and self-monitoring on staff behavior in a classroom for students with disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2006.02-05
Plavnick, J. B., Ferreri, S. J., & Maupin, A. N. (2010). The effects of self-monitoring on the procedural integrity of a behavioral intervention for young children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-315
Radley, K. C., Dart, E. H., & Wright, S. J. (2018). The effect of data points per x- to y-axis ratio on visual evaluation of single-case graphs. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(2), 314–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000243
Richman, G. S., Riordan, M. R., Reiss, M. L., Pyles, D. A., & Bailey, J. S. (1988). The effects of self-monitoring and supervisor feedback on staff performance in a residential setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1988.21-401
Severtson, J. M., & Carr, J. E. (2012). Training novice instructors to implement errorless discrete-trial teaching: A sequential analysis. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5(2), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391820
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Prentice Hall Inc.
Tiemann, P. W., & Markle, S. M. (1990). Analyzing instructional content: A guide to instruction and evaluation. (4th Ed.). Stiper.
Vanselow, N. R., & Bourret, J. C. (2012). Online interactive tutorials for creating graphs with Excel 2007 or 2010. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391816
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
All participants provided written informed consent prior to commencement of the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This study was completed for partial fulfillment of the doctoral degree in behavior analysis for the first author, under the supervision of the second author. The authors would like to thank Grace Eckojojo and Emily Byrne for their assistance with data collection and members of Dr. Chase’s research group, Allison Bowhers, Samantha LaPointe, and John Racine, for their feedback throughout this study.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Guinness, K.E., Chase, P.N., Turner, K.S. et al. Effects of Behavioral Instruction and Feedback Checklists on Graphing Conventions. J Behav Educ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-022-09505-1
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-022-09505-1