Abstract
Equivalence-based instruction (EBI) has been used to successfully teach college-level concepts in research laboratories, but few studies have examined the results of such instruction on classroom performance. The current study answered a basic question about the ordering of training stimuli as well as an applied question regarding the effects of EBI on classroom performance. Students recruited from a Behavioral Neuroscience course learned neuroanatomy concepts using EBI. Outcomes revealed that the ordering of stimuli did not differentially affect performance and that students who completed the tutorial scored significantly higher on the course’s final examination than did students who had not completed the tutorial. Implications for future classroom applications are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arntzen, E. (2004). Probability of equivalence formation: Familiar stimuli and training sequence. The Psychological Record, 54, 275–291.
Baer, M. F., Connors, B. W., & Paradiso, M. A. (2007). Neuroscience: Exploring the brain (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Berrett, D. (2012). How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. The Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/article/How-Flipping-the-Classroom/130857/.
Catania, A. C. (2007). Learning (4th ed.). Cornwall-on-Hudson, NY: Sloan.
Connell, J. E., & Witt, J. C. (2004). Applications of computer-based instruction: Using specialized software to aid letter-name and letter-sound recognition. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 67–71.
Critchfield, T. S., & Fienup, D. M. (2010). Using stimulus equivalence technology to teach statistical inference in a group setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 763–768.
de Rose, J. C., de Souza, D. G., & Hanna, E. S. (1996). Teaching reading and spelling: Exclusion and stimulus equivalence. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 451–469.
Fields, L., Travis, R., Roy, D., Yadlovker, E., De Aguiar-Rocha, L., & Sturmey, P. (2009). Equivalence class formation: A method for teaching statistical interactions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 575–593.
Fienup, D. M., Covey, D. P., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). Teaching brain–behavior relations economically with stimulus equivalence technology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 19–33.
Fienup, D. M., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). Efficiently establishing concepts of inferential statistics and hypothesis decision making through contextually controlled equivalence classes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 437–462.
Fienup, D. M., & Critchfield, T. S. (2011). Transportability of equivalence-based programmed instruction: Efficacy and efficiency in a college classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 435–450.
Fienup, D. M., Hamelin, J., Reyes-Giordano, K., & Falcomata, T. S. (2011). College-level instruction: Derived relations and programmed instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 413–416.
Fienup, D. M., Wright, N., & Fields, L. (2015). Optimization of equivalence based instruction: The effects of training protocols on equivalence class formation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 1–19.
Greenwood, C. R., Bradfield, T., Kaminski, R., Linas, M., Carta, J. J., & Nylander, D. (2011). The response to intervention (RTI) approach in early childhood. Focus on Exceptional Children, 43, 1–22.
Haegele, K. M., McComas, J. J., Dixon, M., & Burns, M. K. (2011). Using a stimulus equivalence paradigm to teach numerals, English words, and Native American words. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20, 283–296.
Hall, S. S., DeBernardis, G. M., & Reiss, A. L. (2006). The acquisition of stimulus equivalence in individuals with fragile X syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50, 643–651.
Kato, O. M., de Rose, J. C., & Faleiros, P. B. (2008). Topography of responses in conditional discrimination influences formation of equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 58, 245–267.
Lane, S. D., & Critchfield, T. S. (1998). Classification of vowels and consonants by individuals with moderate mental retardation: Development of arbitrary relations via match-to-sample training with compound stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 21–41.
LeBlanc, L. A., Miguel, C. F., Cummings, A. R., Goldsmith, T. R., & Carr, J. E. (2003). The effects of three stimulus-equivalence testing conditions on emergent US geography relations of children diagnosed with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 18, 279–289.
Lovett, S., Rehfeldt, R., Garcia, Y., & Dunning, J. (2011). Comparison of a stimulus equivalence protocol and traditional lecture for teaching single-subject designs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 818–833.
Lynch, D. C., & Cuvo, A. J. (1995). Stimulus equivalence instruction of fraction–decimal relations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 115–126.
Nartey, R. K., Arntzen, E., & Fields, L. (2015). Training order and structural location of meaningful stimuli: Effects on equivalence class formation. Learning & Behavior. doi:10.3758/s13420-015-0183-0.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards. Washington, DC: Authors.
Ninness, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., Rumph, R., McCuller, G., Ford, A. M., Payne, R., et al. (2006). Transformations of mathematical functions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 299–321.
Ninness, C., Dixon, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Rehfeldt, R. A., Rumph, R., McCuller, G., et al. (2009). Constructing and deriving reciprocal trigonometric relations: A functional analytic approach. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 191–208.
Ryan, C. S., & Hemmes, N. S. (2005). Effects of the contingency for homework submission on homework submission and quiz performance in a college course. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 79–88.
Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative.
Travis, R. W., Fields, L., & Arntzen, E. (2014). Discriminative functions and over-training as class-enhancing determinants of meaningful stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 102, 47–65. doi:10.1002/jeab.91.
U.S. Department of Education. (2015). College scorecard: CUNY Queens College. https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/school/?190664-CUNY-Queens-College.
Walker, B. D., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2012). An evaluation of the stimulus equivalence paradigm to teach single-subject design to distance education students via blackboard. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 329–344.
Walker, B. D., Rehfeldt, R. A., & Ninness, C. (2010). Using the stimulus equivalence paradigm to teach course material in an undergraduate rehabilitation course. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 615–633.
Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
Acknowledgments
This research was partially funded by the Undergraduate Research and Mentoring Education (UR/ME) program at Queens College. We thank Ranita Ramotar for all of her help in developing materials and executing this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fienup, D.M., Mylan, S.E., Brodsky, J. et al. From the Laboratory to the Classroom: The Effects of Equivalence-Based Instruction on Neuroanatomy Competencies. J Behav Educ 25, 143–165 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-015-9241-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-015-9241-0