Abstract
In this study, we examined whether individualized, student-selected, parent-delivered reading interventions would produce generalized oral reading fluency improvements. Three 3rd-grade students received reading fluency interventions (repeated readings, modeling, error correction, and flashcard instruction) 1 at a time and were shown the results that each intervention produced. The students then selected the intervention strategies they wanted their parents to use. We trained parents in the student-selected reading intervention package who delivered the interventions for 4–5 weeks, and students were given the opportunity to earn rewards for generalized performance improvements at the end of each week in school. Using an alternating treatments design, results of parent tutoring were compared to a control condition that included a reinforcement contingency for generalized performance improvements to control for reinforcement effects across conditions. Generalized improvements in oral reading fluency (to high-word-overlap passages) were found for all participants. Results are discussed in terms of how educators can improve parent-tutoring outcomes by influencing students’ motivation to engage in tutoring procedures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, L. (2003). The role of parents in motivating struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 87–106. doi:10.1080/10573560308207.
Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., & Hersen, M. (2009). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Carson, P. M., & Eckert, T. L. (2003). An experimental analysis of mathematics instructional components: Examining the effects of student-selected versus empirically-selected interventions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 35–54.
Chard, D. J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. J. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386–406.
Daly, E. J., III., Bonfiglio, C. M., Mattson, T., Persampieri, M., & Foreman-Yates, K. (2006a). Refining the experimental analysis of academic skill deficits, Part II: An Investigation of the use of brief experimental analysis for identifying reading fluency interventions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 323–331.
Daly, E. J., III., Garbacz, S. A., Olson, S. C., Persampieri, M., & Ni, H. (2006b). Improving oral reading fluency by influencing students’ choice of instructional procedures: An experimental analysis with two students with behavioral disorders. Behavioral Interventions, 21, 13–30.
Daly, E. J., III., Hofstadter, K. L., Martinez, R. S., & Andersen, M. (2010). Selecting academic interventions. In G. A. Gimpel, R. Ervin, E. J. Daly III., & K. W. Merrell (Eds.), The practical handbook of school psychology: Effective practices for the 21st century (pp. 115–132). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
Daly, E. J., III., & Martens, B. K. (1994). A comparison of three interventions for increasing oral reading performance: Application of the instructional hierarchy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 459–469.
Daly, E. J., III., Martens, B. K., Dool, E. J., & Hintze, J. M. (1998). Using brief functional analysis to select interventions for oral reading. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 203–218.
Daly, E. J., III., Martens, B. K., Hamler, K. R., Dool, E. J., & Eckert, T. L. (1999). A brief experimental analysis for identifying instructional components needed to improve oral reading fluency. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 83–94.
Daly, E. J., III., Persampieri, M., McCurdy, M., & Gortmaker, V. (2005). Generating reading interventions through experimental analysis of academic skills: Demonstration and empirical evaluation. School Psychology Review, 34, 395–414.
Daly, E. J., III., Shroder, J., & Robinson, A. (2001/2006). Testing treatments for oral reading fluency problems—Two case studies. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 7, 4–26 (reprinted from Proven Practice: Prevention and Remediation Solutions for Schools, 4, 2–10).
Daly, E. J., III., Wells, J. N., Swanger-Gagne, M., Carr, J. E., Kunz, G. M., & Taylor, A. M. (2009). Evaluation of the multiple-stimulus without replacement stimulus preference assessment method using activities as stimulus events. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 563–574.
Daly, E. J., III., Witt, J. C., Martens, B. K., & Dool, E. J. (1997). A model for conducting a functional analysis of academic performance problems. School Psychology Review, 26, 554–574.
Dunlap, G., DePerczel, M., Clarke, S., Wilson, D., Wright, S., White, R., & Gomez, A. (1994). Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 505–518. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-505.
Dunlap, G., & Kern, L. (1996). Modifying instructional activities to promote desirable behavior: A conceptual and practical framework. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 297–312.
Dunlap, G., Kern-Dunlap, L., Clarke, S., & Robbins, F. R. (1991). Functional assessment, curricular revision, and severe behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 387–397.
Duvall, S. F., Delquadri, J. C., Elliott, M., & Hall, V. R. (1992). Parent-tutoring procedures: Experimental analysis and validation of generalization in oral reading across passages, settings, and time. Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 281–303. doi:10.1007/BF00948819.
Eckert, T. L., Ardoin, S. P., Daly, E. J., III., & Martens, B. K. (2002). Improving oral reading fluency: An examination of the efficacy of combining skill-based and performance-based interventions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 271–281.
Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., & Moody, S. W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605–619.
Erion, J. (2006). Parent tutoring: A meta-analysis. Education and Treatment of Children, 29, 79–106.
Fisher, W. W., & Mazur, J. E. (1997). Basic and applied research on choice responding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 387–410.
Fisher, W. W., Thompson, R. H., Piazza, C. C., Crosland, K., & Gotjen, D. (1997). On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 423–438.
Good, R. H., III., & Kaminski, R. A. (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills, administration and scoring guide (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
Gortmaker, V. J., Daly, E. J., III., McCurdy, M., Persampieri, M., & Hergenrader, M. (2007). Improving reading outcomes for children with learning disabilities: Using brief experimental analysis to develop parent-tutoring interventions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 203–221. doi:10.1901/jaba.2007.105-05.
Grossen, B., & Carnine, D. (1991). Strategies for maximizing reading success in the regular classroom. In G. Stoner, M. R. Shinn, & H. M. Walker (Eds.), Interventions for achievement and behavior problems (pp. 333–356). Silver Spring, MD: The National Association of School Psychologists.
Harding, J., Wacker, D. P., Cooper, L. J., Millard, T., & Jensen-Kovalan, P. (1994). Brief hierarchical assessment of potential treatment components with children in an outpatient clinic. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 291–300.
Hofstadter, K. L., & Daly, E. J., III.. (2011). Improving oral reading fluency using a peer-mediated reading intervention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 641–646.
Kameénui, E., & Simmons, D. (2001). Introduction to this special issue: The DNA of oral reading fluency. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 203–210.
Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kern, L., Mantegna, M. E., Vorndran, C. M., Bailin, D., & Hilt, A. (2001). Choice of task sequence to reduce problem behaviors. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 3, 3–10. doi:10.1177/109830070100300102.
Kern, L., Vorndran, C. M., Hilt, A., Ringdahl, J. E., Adelman, B. E., & Dunlap, G. (1998). Choice as an intervention to improve behavior: A review of the literature. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 151–169.
Martens, B. K., Witt, J. C., Daly, E. J., III., & Vollmer, T. R. (1999). Behavior analysis: Theory and practice in educational settings. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 638–663). New York, NY: Wiley.
Mercer, C. B., Campbell, K. U., Miller, M. D., Mercer, K. D., & Lane, H. B. (2000). Effects of a reading fluency intervention for middle schoolers with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 2000, 179–198.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (NICHD). (2000). Report of the national reading panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Nist, L., & Joseph, L. (2008). Effectiveness and efficiency of flashcard drill instructional methods on urban first-graders word recognition, acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. School Psychology Review, 37, 264–308.
Noell, G. H. (2008). Research examining the relationships among consultation process, treatment integrity, and outcomes. In W. P. Erchul & S. M. Sheridan (Eds.), Handbook of research in school consultation (pp. 323–341). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
O’Shea, L. J., Munson, S. M., & O’Shea, D. J. (1984). Error correction in oral reading: Evaluating the effectiveness of three procedures. Education and Treatment of Children, 7, 203–214.
Pearson, P. D., Johnson, D. D., Clymer, T., Indirsano, R., Venezky, R. L., Baumann, J. F., et al. (1989). Silver, Burdett, and Ginn. Needham, MA: Silver, Burdett, and Ginn, Inc.
Persampieri, M., Gortmaker, V., Daly, E. J., III., Sheridan, S. M., & McCurdy, M. (2006). Promoting parent use of empirically supported reading interventions: Two experimental investigations of child outcomes. Behavioral Interventions, 21, 31–57.
Rashotte, C. A., & Torgesen, J. K. (1985). Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 180–188.
Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford Press.
Spache, G. (1953). A new readability formula for primary grade materials. Elementary English, 53, 410–413.
Topping, K. I. (2006). Building reading fluency: Cognitive, behavioral, and socioemotional factors and the role of peer-mediated learning. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about fluency instruction (pp. 106–129). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Yeaton, W. H., & Sechrest, L. (1981). Critical dimensions in the choice and maintenance of successful treatments: Strength, integrity, and effectiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 156–167.
Yurick, A. L., Robinson, P. D., Cartledge, G., Lo, Y., & Evans, T. L. (2006). Using peer-mediated repeated readings as a fluency-building activity for urban learners. Education and Treatment of Children, 29, 469–506.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Elizabeth Morris and April Turner for their assistance with this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Daly, E.J., Kupzyk, S. An Investigation of Student-Selected and Parent-Delivered Reading Interventions. J Behav Educ 21, 295–314 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-012-9149-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-012-9149-x