Skip to main content
Log in

Mnemonics Strategy Development: Improving Alphabetic Understanding In Turkish Students, At Risk for Failure in EFL Settings

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of integrated mnemonics on consonant letter naming and consonant sound production for three 4th grade Turkish students, at-risk for failure in an English-as-a-Foreign-Language (EFL) classroom. Mnemonic picture cards, where the target consonant letter was embedded as an integral part of the picture, were developed (e.g., the letter C as the clock, the letter D as the drum). Results showed that (a) all three students reached mastery on consonant letter naming, and (b) all three students showed marked improvement for consonant sound production, with one student reaching mastery. Letter-sound correspondence performance remained near instructional levels one week post-intervention. Generalization data showed students could produce some words that began and ended with consonant sounds, once consonant letter-sound correspondence was mastered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agramonte, V., & Belfiore, P. J. (2002). Using mnemonics to increase early literacy Skills in urban kindergarten students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 181–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental design: Strategies for studying behavior change. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, D. R., & Templeton, S. (1998). Exploration in developmental spelling: Foundations for learning and teaching phonics, spelling, and vocabulary. The Reading Teacher, 53, 222–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulk, B. M., Loman, D., & Belfiore, P. J. (1997). Effects of integrated picture mnemonics on letter recognition and letter-sound acquisition of transitional first grade students with special needs. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (1995). Effects of direct instruction in phonology native skills and foreign language aptitude of at-risk foreign language learners. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, B., Biglan, A., Smolkowski, K., & Ary, D. (2000). The efficacy of supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students in early elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 90–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jannuzi, C. (1998). Literacy Across Cultures: Key Concepts in FL Literacy: Phonemic Awareness. Available at http://www2.aasa.ac.jp/~dcdycus/LAC98/FEB98/PHONOWA1.HTM

  • Mastropieri, M. A., & Fulk, B. M. (1991). Teaching students ways to remember: Strategies for. Learning mnemonically. Cambridge: Brookline.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1998). Constructing more meaningful relationships in the classroom: Mnemonic research into practice. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 138–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1991). Teaching students ways to remember: Strategies for. Learning mnemonically. Cambridge: Brookline.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Levin, J. R., & Delaney, H. D. (1982). The mnemonic keyword strategy. Review of Educational Research, 52, 61–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sari, H. (2000). Development of special education provision in Turkey: From the inclusive perspective. Presented at ISEC Congress, 2000. Available at: http://www.isec2000.org.uk/abstracts/papers_s/sari_1.htm

  • Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1992). Classroom applications of mnemonic instruction: Acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. Exceptional Children, 58, 219–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. B., Simmons, D. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (1998). Phonological awareness: Research bases. In D. C. Simmons & E. J. Kameenui (Eds.), What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs (pp. 61–128). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1991). Foreign language learning difficulties: Affective or native language aptitude differences. Modern Language Journals, 75, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, S. A., Duffy-Hester, A. M., & Stahl, K. A. (1998). Everything you wanted to know about phonics (but where afraid to ask). Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 338–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Ministry of National Education Report (MEB) (1997).T¨rkiye’de Ozel Eğitime Muhtac Cocuklar ve Eğitimleri.’ Ankara; The Ministry of National Education Publication.

  • Williams, J. (1995). Phonemic Awareness. In T. L. Harris & R. E. Hodges (Eds.), The literacy dictionary: The vocabulary of reading and writing (p. 185). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phillip J. Belfiore Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sener, U., Belfiore, P.J. Mnemonics Strategy Development: Improving Alphabetic Understanding In Turkish Students, At Risk for Failure in EFL Settings. J Behav Educ 14, 105–115 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-005-2705-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-005-2705-x

Keywords

Navigation