Skip to main content
Log in

Protein—ligand structure determination with the NMR molecular replacement tool, NMR2

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Biomolecular NMR Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We recently reported on a new method called NMR Molecular Replacement that efficiently derives the structure of a protein—ligand complex at the interaction site. The method was successfully applied to high and low affinity complexes covering ligands from peptides to small molecules. The algorithm used in the NMR Molecular Replacement program has until now not been described in detail. Here, we present a complete description of the NMR Molecular Replacement implementation as well as several new features that further reduce the time required for structure elucidation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

modified by the user

Fig. 3

taken from the PDB with the protein structure coloured in grey and every non-standard molecule, such as water ions and other organic molecules, coloured in red (PDB 5c5a). b The same protein structure as in (a) ready for the NMR2 structure calculation. The protein chain A was selected and protons were built. The non-standard molecules were removed, the small-molecule of interest was added, coloured in gold, and linked to the protein by “dummy atoms” coloured in blue

Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Requests should be sent to the corresponding author.

References

  • Balaram P, Bothnerb AA, Breslow E (1972) Localization of tyrosine at binding-site of neurophysin Ii by negative nuclear overhauser effects. J Am Chem Soc 94:40174020

    Google Scholar 

  • Breeze AL (2000) Isotope-filtered NMR methods for the study of biomolecular structure and interactions. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 36:323–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh J, Fairbrother WJ, Palmer AG, Rance M, Skleton NJ (2007) Protein NMR spectroscopy, principles and practice. Academic Press, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen WN et al (2016) Sensitive NMR approach for determining the binding mode of tightly binding ligand molecules to protein targets. J Am Chem Soc 138:4539–4546

    Google Scholar 

  • Cioffi M, Hunter CA, Packer MJ, Spitaleri A (2008) Determination of protein-ligand binding modes using complexation-induced changes in H-1 NMR chemical shift. J Med Chem 51:2512–2517

    Google Scholar 

  • Clore GM, Schwieters CD (2003) Docking of protein-protein complexes on the basis of highly ambiguous intermolecular distance restraints derived from H-1(N)/N-15 chemical shift mapping and backbone N-15-H-1 residual dipolar couplings using conjoined rigid body/torsion angle dynamics. J Am Chem Soc 125:2902–2912

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantine KL, Davis ME, Metzler WJ, Mueller L, Claus BL (2006) Protein-ligand NOE matching: a high-throughput method for binding pose evaluation that does not require protein NMR resonance assignments. J Am Chem Soc 128:7252–7263

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin AMJJ (2003) HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J Am Chem Soc 125:1731–1737

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans P et al (2010) Stereospecific isotopic labeling of methyl groups for NMR spectroscopic studies of high-molecular-weight proteins. Angew Chem-Int Edn 49:1958–1962

    Google Scholar 

  • Grishaev A, Llinas M (2002) CLOUDS, a protocol for deriving a molecular proton density via NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:6707–6712

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Guan JY et al (2013) Small-molecule binding sites on proteins established by paramagnetic NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 135:5859–5868

    Google Scholar 

  • Guntert P, Buchner L (2015) Combined automated NOE assignment and structure calculation with CYANA. J Biomol NMR 62:453–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Guntert P, Mumenthaler C, Wuthrich K (1997) Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. J Mol Biol 273:283–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajduk PJ et al (2004) SOS-NMR: a saturation transfer NMR-based method for determining the structures of protein-ligand complexes. J Am Chem Soc 126:2390–2398

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillisch A, Pineda LF, Hilgenfeld R (2004) Utility of homology models in the drug discovery process. Drug Discovery Today 9:659–669

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayalakshmi V, Krishna NR (2004) CORCEMA refinement of the bound ligand conformation within the protein binding pocket in reversibly forming weak complexes using STD-NMR intensities. J Magn Reson 168:36–45

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser R (1965) Intermolecular nuclear overhauser effect in liquid solutions. J Chem Phys 42:1838–2000

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kay LE, Xu GY, Singer AU, Muhandiram DR, Formankay JD (1993) A gradient-enhanced hcch tocsy experiment for recording side-chain H-1 and C-13 correlations in H2o samples of proteins. J Magn Reson, Ser B 101:333–337

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman Z (2015) Isotope labeling of biomolecules—labeling methods. Methods Enzymol 565:XIX–XX

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerfah R et al (2015a) Scrambling free combinatorial labeling of alanine-beta, isoleucine-delta 1, leucine-proS and valine-proS methyl groups for the detection of long range NOEs. J Biomol NMR 61:73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerfah R, Plevin MJ, Sounier R, Gans P, Boisbouvier J (2015b) Methyl-specific isotopic labeling: a molecular tool box for solution NMR studies of large proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 32:113

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogler H, Sorensen OW, Bodenhausen G, Ernst RR (1983) Low-pass J-filters—suppression of neighbor peaks in heteronuclear relayed correlation spectra. J Magn Reson 55:157–163

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy MA, Wyss DF (2002) Spatial localization of ligand binding sites from electron current density surfaces calculated from NMR chemical shift perturbations. J Am Chem Soc 124:11758–11763

    Google Scholar 

  • Neri D, Szyperski T, Otting G, Senn H, Wuthrich K (1989) Stereospecific nuclear magnetic-resonance assignments of the methyl-groups of valine and leucine in the DNA-binding domain of the 434-repressor by biosynthetically directed fractional C-13 labeling. Biochemistry 28:7510–7516

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni F (1994) Recent developments in transferred noe methods. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 26:517–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilges M (1995) Calculation of protein structures with ambiguous distance restraints—automated assignment of ambiguous noe crosspeaks and disulfide connectivities. J Mol Biol 245:645–660

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilges M, O'Donoghue SI (1998) Ambiguous NOEs and automated NOE assignment. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 32:107–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitsche C, Otting G (2018) NMR studies of ligand binding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 48:16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Noggle JH, Schirmer RE (1971) The nuclear overhauser effect. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Orts J et al (2008) Specific methyl group protonation for the measurement of pharmacophore-specific interligand NOE interactions. Chem-a Eur J 14:7517–7520

    Google Scholar 

  • Orts J et al (2016) NMR-based determination of the 3D structure of the ligand-protein interaction site without protein resonance assignment. J Am Chem Soc 138:4393–4400

    Google Scholar 

  • Orts J, Bartoschek S, Griesinger C, Monecke P, Carlomagno T (2012a) An NMR-based scoring function improves the accuracy of binding pose predictions by docking by two orders of magnitude. J Biomol NMR 52:23–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Orts J, Gossert AD (2018) Structure determination of protein-ligand complexes by NMR in solution. Methods. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2018.01.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orts J, Vogeli B, Riek R (2012b) Relaxation matrix analysis of spin diffusion for the NMR structure calculation with eNOEs. J Chem Theory Comput 8:3483–3492

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellecchia M et al (2002) NMR-based structural characterization of large protein-ligand interactions. J Biomol NMR 22:165–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilla KB, Otting G, Huber T (2017) Protein structure determination by assembling super-secondary structure motifs using pseudocontact shifts. Structure 25:559–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Proudfoot A, Frank AO, Ruggiu F, Mamo M, Lingel A (2016) Facilitating unambiguous NMR assignments and enabling higher probe density through selective labeling of all methyl containing amino acids. J Biomol NMR 65:15–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossmann MG, Blow DM (1962) Detection of sub-units within crystallographic asymmetric unit. Acta Crystallogr A 15:24–000

    Google Scholar 

  • Schieborr U et al (2005) How much NMR data is required to determine a protein-ligand complex structure? ChemBioChem 6:1891–1898

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemons L, Mackenzie HW, Shukla VK, Hansen DF (2019) Intra-residue methyl-methyl correlations for valine and leucine residues in large proteins from a 3D-HMBC-HMQC experiment. J Biomol NMR 73:749–757

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres F et al (2020) Protein–fragment complex structures derived by NMR molecular replacement. Chem RSC Med. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0MD00068J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres F, Orts J (2018) Nuclear magnetic resonance structure-based drug design. Future Med Chem 10:2373–2376

    Google Scholar 

  • Tugarinov V, Kanelis V, Kay LE (2006) Isotope labeling strategies for the study of high-molecular-weight proteins by solution NMR spectroscopy. Nat Protoc 1:749–754

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuister GW, Bax A (1992) Resolution enhancement and spectral editing of uniformly C-13-enriched proteins by homonuclear broad-band C-13 decoupling. J Magn Reson 98:428–435

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Walti MA, Riek R, Orts J (2017) Fast NMR-based determination of the 3D structure of the binding site of protein-ligand complexes with weak affinity binders. Angew Chem-Int Edn 56:5208–5211

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Westerhoff LM, Merz KM (2007) A critical assessment of the performance of protein-ligand scoring functions based on NMR chemical shift perturbations. J Med Chem 50:5128–5134

    Google Scholar 

  • Wälti M, Orts J (2018) The NMR2 method to determine rapidly the structure of the binding pocket of a protein-ligand complex with high accuracy. Magnetochemistry 4:12

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz EM, Guntert P (2015) NMR structure calculation for all small molecule ligands and non-standard residues from the PDB Chemical Component Dictionary. J Biomol NMR 63:21–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwahlen C et al (1997) Methods for measurement of intermolecular NOEs by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy: application to a bacteriophage lambda N-peptide/boxB RNA complex. J Am Chem Soc 119:6711–6721

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the ETH Zürich, who supported this work. Figure 1 includes elements from the free medical images library https://smart.servier.com/ owned by Servier Medical Art and distributed under a creative common license. We thank Overall S. and Greenwald J. for careful reading of the manuscript.

Funding

The ETH Zürich supported this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julien Orts.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 930 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orts, J., Riek, R. Protein—ligand structure determination with the NMR molecular replacement tool, NMR2. J Biomol NMR 74, 633–642 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-020-00324-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-020-00324-y

Keywords

Navigation