Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What they notice in video: a study of prospective secondary mathematics teachers learning to teach

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most teacher preparation programs have embraced the use of video as an effective methodology for developing teachers’ noticing skills. This study focused on learning about what secondary mathematics prospective teachers (PSTs) were able to notice when viewing video of their own co-teaching, particularly in a microteaching setting that consisted of peers. PSTs documented their observations on an observation tool while re-watching their video and then identified and ranked their top three observations. The ranked noticing statements were analyzed based on a grounded theory approach. Overall, PSTs’ ranked observations were more likely to attend to students and had a strong focus on mathematics and student learning. Ranked observations equally demonstrated both broad and specific understanding of video moments and often made suggestions that something they noticed could be improved in the implementation stage, versus improvements in planning or changes in themselves. Results support PSTs’ use of video for developing noticing skills in teacher education programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers’ ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. (2004). Discussion. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education: Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 10, pp. 287–304). doi:10.1016/S1479-3687(03)10011-9.

  • Erickson, F. (2011). On noticing teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Phillipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 17–34). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). Helping novices learn to teach: Lessons from an exemplary support teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(1), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, M. L. (2005). Learning through microteaching lesson study in teacher preparation. Action in Teacher Education, 26(4), 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, New Series, 96(3), 606–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement (pp. 112–113). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., Morris, A. K., Berk, D., & Jansen, A. (2007). Preparing teachers to learn from teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children's mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202.

  • Mason, J. (2011). Noticing: Roots and branches. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Phillipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 35–50). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDuffie, A. R., Foote, M. Q., Bolson, C., Turner, E. E., Aguirre, J. M., Bartell, T. G., et al. (2014). Using video analysis to support prospective K-8 teachers’ noticing of students’ multiple mathematical knowledge bases. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(3), 245–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mewborn, D. S. (1999). Reflective thinking among preservice elementary mathematics teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(3), 316–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santagata, R. (2011). From teacher noticing to a framework for analyzing and improving classroom lessons. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Phillipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 117–133). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, M. G. (2004). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education: Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 10, pp. 1–27). doi:10.1016/S1479-3687(03)10001-6.

  • Sherin, M. G., & Han, S. Y. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 1–238). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, B. & Star, J. R. (2011). Reflections on the study of teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Phillipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 66–78). New York: Routledge.

  • Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (1998). Selecting and creating mathematical tasks: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(5), 344–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, J. R., Lynch, K. H., & Perova, N. (2011). Using video to improve mathematics’ teachers’ abilities to attend to classroom features: A replication study. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Phillipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 117–133). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. (2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1906 Association Drive.

  • Van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Phillipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 117–133). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2006). How different video club designs support teachers in “learning to notice”. International Society for Technology in Education, 22(4), 125–135.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah A. Roller.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Organizational tool for video observation

This tool is to help you document what you are noticing while watching your teaching video. The goal is to help you create a complete list of everything you noticed and then to have you focus in on the three observations that you think are the most important and why these stuck out as the most important to you.

Part 1: list of things I noticed…

Directions: While watching the video of yourself teaching, make a list of all the things you notice. The list doesn’t need to be in any particular order, just observations that you noticed and are now aware of from watching the video. I’ve placed some bullets below to get you started, but feel free to add more or use less depending on what you see in your video.

figure a

Part 2: prioritizing which observations were important

Directions: After watching the video and making your list of observations, you need to pick the top three things you noticed from your video. Rank these 1 (Most important observation), 2 (Next important), and 3 (Least important out of your top three observations). Write down what your observation was and then go into detail (at least a paragraph) as to why that specific observation was so important and how you decided to rank it there.

  1. 1.

    (Most important observation)

  2. 2.

    (2nd most important observation)

  3. 3.

    (3rd most important observation)

Appendix 2: interview protocol

  1. 1.

    Can you describe your experience teaching in microteaching lab.

    1. 1a.

      How did you feel about videotaping yourself?

    2. 1b.

      What was it like to go back and re-watch your teaching episode?

  2. 2.

    Can you describe what sorts of things you were able to notice in your video?

    1. 2a.

      How did you decide how to prioritize these observations?

  3. 3.

    On your observation tool, you ranked your top three observations. Can you describe how you decided on these three and their ranking?

    1. 3a.

      Can you tell me more about the reason you ranked specific observations above or below others?

  4. 4.

    In what ways did the set of three important observations influence your thinking about your teaching practice?

    1. 4a.

      If need to clarify: Teaching practice could be defined as: planning lessons, teaching lessons, and interacting with students

    2. 4b.

      Did these observations have any influence on your work in your field placement?

    3. 4c.

      Anything else from the larger list…

  5. 5.

    Thinking across the experience this year in recording and re-watching your own practice, in what ways was this process valuable to your development as a teacher?

    1. 5a.

      Thinking now about your experience in the internship year coming up, in what ways do you see the videotaping practice as supporting your work?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roller, S.A. What they notice in video: a study of prospective secondary mathematics teachers learning to teach. J Math Teacher Educ 19, 477–498 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9307-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9307-x

Keywords

Navigation