Abstract
This study explores the relationship between participating in a graduate course aimed at enhancing teachers’ theoretical and practical knowledge of mathematical creativity and one teacher’s changing perspectives regarding mathematical creativity and tasks that may occasion mathematical creativity. Results indicated that perceptions of creativity may include ideas about how creativity is characterized as well as among which students it may be promoted. These perceptions were closely related to the task features, cognitive demands, and affective issues, the teacher associated with tasks that may occasion mathematical creativity. The teacher’s reflections on her participation in the course indicated that both theoretical and practical elements of the course impacted on her changing perspectives. Also discussed are the advantages and limitations of providing professional development by means of university-based graduate courses.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The “king’s way” is an expression in Hebrew, which loosely translated can mean either “the right track” or “the path most often taken.”
References
Aljughaiman, A., & Mowerer-Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers’ conceptions of creativity and creative students. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 39(1), 17–34.
Ball, D., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Boaler, J. (1998). Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understandings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 41–62.
Bolden, D., Harries, T., & Newton, D. (2010). Preservice primary teachers’ conceptions of creativity in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(2), 143–157.
Campbell, P. F., & White, D. (1997). Project IMPACT: Influencing and supporting teacher change in predominantly minority schools. In E. Fennema & B. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 309–355). Mahwah, JJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
DeBellis, V., & Goldin, G. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 131–147.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher, 38(3), 181–199.
Doyle, W. (1988). Work in mathematics classes: The context of students’ thinking during instruction. Educational Psychologist, 23, 167–180.
Even, R., Karsenty, R., & Friedlander, A. (2009). Mathematical creativity and giftedness in teacher professional development. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 309–324). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.
Haylock, D. (1997). Recognizing mathematical creativity in schoolchildren. ZDM, 27(2), 68–74.
Jung, D. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and their effects on creativity in groups. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 185–195.
Kaufman, J., & Beghetto, R. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12.
Kwon, O. N., Park, J. S., & Park, J. H. (2006). Cultivating divergent thinking in mathematics through an open-ended approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(1), 51–61.
Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 129–135). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Leikin, R., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2013). Creativity and mathematics education: The state of the art. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(4), 159–166.
Leikin, R., Subotnik, R., Pitta-Pantazi, D., Singer, F. M., & Pelczer, I. (2013). International survey on teachers’ perspectives on creativity in mathematics education. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(4), 309–324.
Levav-Waynberg, A., & Leikin, R. (2012). The role of multiple solution tasks in developing knowledge and creativity in geometry. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 73–90.
Levenson, E. (2011). Exploring collective mathematical creativity in elementary school. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 45(3), 215–234.
Levenson, E. (2012). Tasks that may occasion mathematical creativity: One teacher’s developing perspective. Paper presented at The 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, July 8–15, Seoul, Korea.
Levenson, E. (2013). Tasks that may occasion mathematical creativity: Teachers’ choices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,. doi:10.1007/s10857-012-9229-9.
Levenson, E., & Gal, H. (2013). Insights from a teacher professional development course: Rona’s changing perspectives regarding mathematically-talented students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,. doi:10.1007/s10763-012-9368-6.
Lin, C., & Cho, S. (2011). Predicting creative problem-solving in math from a dynamic system model of creative problem solving ability. Creativity Research Journal, 23(3), 255–261.
Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67, 255–276.
Livne, N. L., & Milgram, R. M. (2006). Academic versus creative abilities in mathematics: Two components of the same construct? Creativity Research Journal, 18, 199–212.
Mann, E. (2006). Creativity: The essence of mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 236–260.
Nicol, C., & Crespo, S. (2006). Learning to teach with mathematics textbooks: How preservice teachers interpret and use curriculum materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(3), 331–355.
Park, S., Lee, S. Y., Oliver, J. S., & Cramond, B. (2006). Changes in Korean science teachers’ perceptions of creativity and science teaching after participating in an overseas professional development program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(1), 37–64.
Pepin, B. (2009). ‘Negativity’ and learner identity: Classroom tasks, the ‘minus sign’ and classroom environments in English, French and German classrooms. In J. Maass & W. Schloeglmann (Eds.), Beliefs and attitudes in mathematics education: New research results (pp. 179–196). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Peterson, P. L., Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. C., & Loef, M. (1989). Teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 1–40.
Remillard, J. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
Runco, M. (1996). Personal creativity: Definition and developmental issues. New Directions for Child Development, 72, 3–30.
Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20.
Sheffield, L. J. (2009). Developing mathematical creativity: Questions may be the answer. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 87–100). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Shriki, A. (2010). Working like real mathematicians: Developing prospective teachers’ awareness of mathematical creativity through generating new concept. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73, 159–179.
Silver, E. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM, 3, 75–80.
Silver, E. A., & Cai, J. (2005). Assessing students’ mathematical problem posing. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12, 129–135.
Silver, E. A., Mesa, V. M., Morris, K. A., Star, J. R., & Benken, B. M. (2009). Teaching mathematics for understanding: An analysis of lessons submitted by teachers seeking NBPTS certification. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 501–531.
Sriraman, B. (2003). Mathematical giftedness, problem solving, and the ability to formulate generalizations: The problem-solving experiences of four gifted students. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14(3), 151–165.
Sriraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness & creativity synonyms in mathematics? An analysis of constructs within the professional and school realms. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 20–36.
Sriraman, B. (2009). The characteristics of mathematical creativity. ZDM, 41, 13–27.
Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 455–488.
Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., & Silver, E. A. (1999). The development of professional developers: Learning to assist teachers in new settings in new ways. Harvard educational review, 69(3), 237–270.
Stipek, D. J., Givvin, K. B., Salmon, J. M., & MacGyvers, V. L. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 213–226.
Tirosh, D., & Graeber, A. (2003). Challenging and changing mathematics teaching classroom practices. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, D. Brunei, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), The second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 643–687). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Torrance, E. (1965). Rewarding creative behavior. New Jersey: Personnel Press.
Tsamir, P. (2007). When intuition beats logic: Prospective teachers’ awareness of their same-sides—same angles solutions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65, 255–279.
Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., Tabach, M., & Levenson, E. (2010). Multiple solutions and multiple outcomes: Is it a task for kindergarten children? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(3), 217–231.
Van Zoest, L., & Bohl, J. (2002). The role of reform curricular materials in an internship: The case of Alice and Gregory. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 265–288.
Watson, A., & Sullivan, P. (2008). Teachers learning about tasks and lessons. In D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.), Tools and resources in mathematics teacher education (pp. 109–135). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Wood, T., Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1991). Change in teaching mathematics: A case study. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 587–616.
Zaslavsky, O. (2007). Mathematics-related tasks, teacher education, and teacher educators. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 433–440.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levenson, E. Exploring Ava’s developing sense for tasks that may occasion mathematical creativity. J Math Teacher Educ 18, 1–25 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9262-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9262-3