Skip to main content
Log in

Reinscribing urban: teaching high school mathematics in low income, urban communities of color

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reports findings from a research and professional development project at two high schools located in low-income, urban communities of color. The project collaborates with teachers on improving their instructional practices, using a framework of culturally relevant mathematics pedagogy, which is described in detail here. We present results from a qualitative and quantitative analysis of mathematics instruction in 68 classroom observations of seven teachers. In particular, we use culturally relevant mathematics pedagogy as a lens through which to analyze instruction and the associated opportunities to learn mathematics provided to students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this article, we intend the meaning of “urban” to specifically indicate “of or relating to a city”.

  2. One of these eight teachers was a special education teacher who co-teaches mainstream mathematics courses with mathematics teachers.

  3. For instance, nearly 91% of students enrolled at Harwood were middle school students in this district, and only 30% of those scored at or above proficiency level on their 8th-grade state mathematics examination.

  4. Names of schools and teachers are pseudonyms.

  5. Three of the four mathematics teachers at Carver and four of the five mathematics teachers at Harwood were full participants in the project in 2009–2010.

  6. Two observations of two of the teachers were dropped from the data set because of highly atypical circumstances.

  7. An independent-samples t test for differences between the two researchers in mean ratings of each of the rating scales over the 13 jointly observed lessons was conducted, and differences were not statistically significant (α = 0.01).

  8. All six pairings of the four ratings categories are correlated at the 1% level, with Pearson correlation coefficients of at least 0.723.

  9. The two teachers with the highest instructional environment ratings had mean ratings that are significantly higher, using an independent-samples t test, than the two teachers with the lowest ratings (p < 0.01).

References

  • Boaler, J. (2002). Learning from teaching: Exploring the relationship between reform curriculum and equity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(4), 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & McClain, K. (2000). Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2001). The challenge of staffing our schools. Educational Leadership, 58(8), 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J., & Martin, D. (2008). Racism, assessment and instructional practices: Implications for mathematics teachers of African American students. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 1, 10–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, A. (2007). Examining disparities in mathematics education: Achievement gap or opportunity gap? High School Journal, 91(1), 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furman Center for Real Estate, & Urban Policy. (2008). State of New York City’s housing and neighborhoods, 2008 report. New York: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J., & Gresalfi, M. (2008). Opportunities to learn in practice and identity. In P. Moss, D. Pullin, J. P. Gee, E. Haertel, & L. J. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 170–199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, R. (1999). Advancing urban Latino/a youth: Lessons from an effective high school mathematics department. Urban Review, 31(3), 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, R. (2007). Context matters: Equity, success, and the future of mathematics education. In T. Lamberg & L. R. Wiest (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International group for the psychology of mathematics education. Stateline (Lake Tahoe), NV: University of Nevada, Reno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, R. (2008). A “gap gazing” fetish in mathematics education?: Problematizing research on the achievement gap. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 357–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 37–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutstein, E., Lipman, P., Hernández, P., & de los Reyes, R. (1997). Culturally relevant mathematics teaching in a Mexican American context. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(6), 708–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, M. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(4), 290–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand, V. (2003). Reframing participation: Meaningful mathematical activity in diverse classrooms. Unpublished dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

  • Hand, V. (2010). The co-construction of opposition in a low-track mathematics classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 97–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 524–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65–97). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, I. S. (2006). Lessons learned from detracked mathematics departments. Theory Into Practice, 45(1), 72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen, R., DePree, J., Celedón-Pattichis, S., & Brinkerhoff, J. (2007). Mathematics education at highly effective schools that serve the poor: Strategies for change. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, P. (2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization, and urban school reform. New York: Routledge Farmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lubienski, S. T. (2000). Problem solving as a means toward “mathematics for all”: An exploratory look through a class lens. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 454–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: A qualitative approach to connect households and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moses, R. P., & Cobb, C. E. (2001). Radical equations: Math literacy and civil rights. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York State Education Department. (2010). Accountability and overview report. Albany, NY: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F., Secada, W., & Wehlage, G. (1995). A guide to authentic instruction and assessment: Vision, standards, and scoring. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools, Wisconsin Center for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, J. (1995). Two cities’ tracking and within-school segregation. Teachers College Record, 96(4), 681–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, A. J., & Kitchen, R. S. (2005). Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubel, L. (2012). Centering the teaching of mathematics on urban youth: Learning together about our students and their communities. In Professional collaborations in mathematics teaching and learning: Seeking success for all (NCTM 2012 Yearbook).

  • Rubel, L., & Chu, H. (2010). Putting the city back in “urban”: High school mathematics teaching in low-income communities of color. In P. Brosnan, D. Erchick, & L. Flevares (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 497–504). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubel, L., Chu, H., & Shookhoff, L. (2011). Learning to map and mapping to learn our students’ worlds. Mathematics Teacher, 104(8), 587–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E., Smith, M., & Nelson, B. (1995). The QUASAR project: Equity concerns meet mathematics education reform in the middle school. In W. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 9–56). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovsmose, O. (1994). Toward a philosophy of critical mathematics education. Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. S., Stein, M. K., Arbaugh, F., Brown, C. A., & Mossgrove, J. (2004). Characterizing the cognitive demands of mathematical tasks: A task-sorting activity. In R. Rubenstein & G. Bright (Eds.), Professional development guidebook for perspectives on the teaching of mathematics: Companion to the sixty-sixth yearbook (pp. 45–72). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (1998). Mathematical tasks as a framework for reflection: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3, 268–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate, W. F. (2005). Race, retrenchment, and the reform of school mathematics. In E. Gutstein & B. Peterson (Eds.), Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers (pp. 31–40). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, L. (2000). Research in the 90’s: Implications for urban teacher preparation. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 369–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, I. R., Pasley, J. D., Smith, P. S., Banilower, E., & Heck, D. J. (2003). Looking inside the classroom: A study of mathematics and science education in the United States. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant no. 0742614. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors thank Vicki Hand for her thoughtful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurie H. Rubel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rubel, L.H., Chu, H. Reinscribing urban: teaching high school mathematics in low income, urban communities of color. J Math Teacher Educ 15, 39–52 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9200-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9200-1

Keywords

Navigation