Abstract
This article reports findings from a research and professional development project at two high schools located in low-income, urban communities of color. The project collaborates with teachers on improving their instructional practices, using a framework of culturally relevant mathematics pedagogy, which is described in detail here. We present results from a qualitative and quantitative analysis of mathematics instruction in 68 classroom observations of seven teachers. In particular, we use culturally relevant mathematics pedagogy as a lens through which to analyze instruction and the associated opportunities to learn mathematics provided to students.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In this article, we intend the meaning of “urban” to specifically indicate “of or relating to a city”.
One of these eight teachers was a special education teacher who co-teaches mainstream mathematics courses with mathematics teachers.
For instance, nearly 91% of students enrolled at Harwood were middle school students in this district, and only 30% of those scored at or above proficiency level on their 8th-grade state mathematics examination.
Names of schools and teachers are pseudonyms.
Three of the four mathematics teachers at Carver and four of the five mathematics teachers at Harwood were full participants in the project in 2009–2010.
Two observations of two of the teachers were dropped from the data set because of highly atypical circumstances.
An independent-samples t test for differences between the two researchers in mean ratings of each of the rating scales over the 13 jointly observed lessons was conducted, and differences were not statistically significant (α = 0.01).
All six pairings of the four ratings categories are correlated at the 1% level, with Pearson correlation coefficients of at least 0.723.
The two teachers with the highest instructional environment ratings had mean ratings that are significantly higher, using an independent-samples t test, than the two teachers with the lowest ratings (p < 0.01).
References
Boaler, J. (2002). Learning from teaching: Exploring the relationship between reform curriculum and equity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(4), 239–258.
Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & McClain, K. (2000). Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms. New York: Routledge.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2001). The challenge of staffing our schools. Educational Leadership, 58(8), 12–17.
Davis, J., & Martin, D. (2008). Racism, assessment and instructional practices: Implications for mathematics teachers of African American students. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 1, 10–34.
Flores, A. (2007). Examining disparities in mathematics education: Achievement gap or opportunity gap? High School Journal, 91(1), 29–42.
Furman Center for Real Estate, & Urban Policy. (2008). State of New York City’s housing and neighborhoods, 2008 report. New York: Author.
Greeno, J., & Gresalfi, M. (2008). Opportunities to learn in practice and identity. In P. Moss, D. Pullin, J. P. Gee, E. Haertel, & L. J. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 170–199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gutiérrez, R. (1999). Advancing urban Latino/a youth: Lessons from an effective high school mathematics department. Urban Review, 31(3), 263–282.
Gutiérrez, R. (2007). Context matters: Equity, success, and the future of mathematics education. In T. Lamberg & L. R. Wiest (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International group for the psychology of mathematics education. Stateline (Lake Tahoe), NV: University of Nevada, Reno.
Gutiérrez, R. (2008). A “gap gazing” fetish in mathematics education?: Problematizing research on the achievement gap. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 357–364.
Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 37–73.
Gutstein, E., Lipman, P., Hernández, P., & de los Reyes, R. (1997). Culturally relevant mathematics teaching in a Mexican American context. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(6), 708–737.
Haberman, M. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(4), 290–294.
Hand, V. (2003). Reframing participation: Meaningful mathematical activity in diverse classrooms. Unpublished dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Hand, V. (2010). The co-construction of opposition in a low-track mathematics classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 97–132.
Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 524–549.
Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65–97). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Horn, I. S. (2006). Lessons learned from detracked mathematics departments. Theory Into Practice, 45(1), 72–81.
Kitchen, R., DePree, J., Celedón-Pattichis, S., & Brinkerhoff, J. (2007). Mathematics education at highly effective schools that serve the poor: Strategies for change. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.
Lipman, P. (2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization, and urban school reform. New York: Routledge Farmer.
Lubienski, S. T. (2000). Problem solving as a means toward “mathematics for all”: An exploratory look through a class lens. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 454–482.
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: A qualitative approach to connect households and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.
Moses, R. P., & Cobb, C. E. (2001). Radical equations: Math literacy and civil rights. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
New York State Education Department. (2010). Accountability and overview report. Albany, NY: Author.
Newmann, F., Secada, W., & Wehlage, G. (1995). A guide to authentic instruction and assessment: Vision, standards, and scoring. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools, Wisconsin Center for Educational Research.
Oakes, J. (1995). Two cities’ tracking and within-school segregation. Teachers College Record, 96(4), 681–690.
Rodriguez, A. J., & Kitchen, R. S. (2005). Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rubel, L. (2012). Centering the teaching of mathematics on urban youth: Learning together about our students and their communities. In Professional collaborations in mathematics teaching and learning: Seeking success for all (NCTM 2012 Yearbook).
Rubel, L., & Chu, H. (2010). Putting the city back in “urban”: High school mathematics teaching in low-income communities of color. In P. Brosnan, D. Erchick, & L. Flevares (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 497–504). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
Rubel, L., Chu, H., & Shookhoff, L. (2011). Learning to map and mapping to learn our students’ worlds. Mathematics Teacher, 104(8), 587–591.
Silver, E., Smith, M., & Nelson, B. (1995). The QUASAR project: Equity concerns meet mathematics education reform in the middle school. In W. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 9–56). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skovsmose, O. (1994). Toward a philosophy of critical mathematics education. Netherlands: Kluwer.
Smith, M. S., Stein, M. K., Arbaugh, F., Brown, C. A., & Mossgrove, J. (2004). Characterizing the cognitive demands of mathematical tasks: A task-sorting activity. In R. Rubenstein & G. Bright (Eds.), Professional development guidebook for perspectives on the teaching of mathematics: Companion to the sixty-sixth yearbook (pp. 45–72). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (1998). Mathematical tasks as a framework for reflection: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3, 268–275.
Tate, W. F. (2005). Race, retrenchment, and the reform of school mathematics. In E. Gutstein & B. Peterson (Eds.), Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers (pp. 31–40). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
Weiner, L. (2000). Research in the 90’s: Implications for urban teacher preparation. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 369–406.
Weiss, I. R., Pasley, J. D., Smith, P. S., Banilower, E., & Heck, D. J. (2003). Looking inside the classroom: A study of mathematics and science education in the United States. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Acknowledgments
This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant no. 0742614. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors thank Vicki Hand for her thoughtful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rubel, L.H., Chu, H. Reinscribing urban: teaching high school mathematics in low income, urban communities of color. J Math Teacher Educ 15, 39–52 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9200-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9200-1