Abstract
This article reports findings from a study conducted within a teacher education program to help highlight the importance of equitable instruction of mathematics for all students. The researcher developed four scenarios of her oppressive and liberative teaching practices. Prospective teachers were then asked to write scenarios describing their oppressive and liberative teaching practices. Results showed that prospective teachers found it easier to write liberative teaching practices of themselves than oppressive examples. Scenario themes centered on allowing students ample time to understand mathematical concepts, having high expectations for all students, and addressing individual student’s needs. Developing prospective teachers who are aware of equity in teaching requires ample time to discuss authentic issues in diversity. Teacher educators need to be aware of their own oppressive and liberative teaching practices in doing such work.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apple, M. W. (1990). Ideology and curriculum (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Berry, R. (2008). Access to upper-level mathematics: The stories of successful African American middle school boys. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(5), 464–488.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Carspecken, P. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.
de Freitas, E., & Zolkower, B. (2009). Using social justice to prepare mathematics teachers to teach for social justice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(1), 187–203.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
Freire, P. (2003 paperback edition [1970 orig. pub. date]). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Gates, P., & Jorgensen, R. (2009). Foregrounding social justice in mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(3), 161–170.
Given, L. M. (2008). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway: Aldine Transaction.
Kitchen, R. S. (2005). Making equity and multiculturalism explicit to transform mathematics education. In A. J. Rodriguez & R. S. Kitchen (Eds.), Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms (pp. 33–60). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kumashiro, K. K. (2000). Toward a theory of anti-oppressive education. Review of Educational Researcher, 70(1), 25–53.
Kumashiro, K. K. (2001). “Posts” perspectives on anti-oppressive education in social studies, English, mathematic, and science classrooms. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 3–12.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers for African-American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1997). It doesn’t add up: African American students’ mathematics achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6), 697–708.
Malloy, C. E., & Jones, M. G. (1998). An investigation of African American students’ mathematical problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(2), 143–163.
McCutcheon, G. (1988). Curriculum and the work of teachers. In M. W. Apple & L. Beyer (Eds.), The curriculum: Problems, politics, and possibilities (pp. 191–203). New York: State University of New York Press.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Moses, R. P., & Cobb, C. E. (2001). Radical equations: Math literacy and civil rights. Boston: Beacon Press.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards of school mathematics. Reston: Author.
Nolan, K. (2009). Mathematics in and through social justice: Another misunderstood marriage? Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(1), 205–216.
Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257–318). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Rodriguez, A. J. (1998). Strategies for counterresistance: Toward sociotransformative constructivism and learning to teach science for diversity and for understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 589–622.
Rodriguez, A. J. (2005). Teachers’ resistance to ideological and pedagogical change: Definitions, theoretical framework, and significance. In A. J. Rodriguez & R. S. Kitchen (Eds.), Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms (pp. 1–16). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rodriguez, A. J., & Berryman, C. (2002). Using sociotransformative constructivism to teach for understanding in diverse classrooms: A beginning teacher’s journey. American Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 1017–1045.
Rodriguez, A. J., & Kitchen, R. S. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rousseau, C., & Tate, W. F. (2003). No time like the present: Reflecting on equity in school mathematics. Theory into Practice, 42(3), 210–216.
Samuelsson, J. (2008). The impact of different teaching methods on students’ arithmetic and self-regulated learning skills. Educational Psychology in Practice, 24(3), 237–250.
Smith, J. P., I. I. I. (1996). Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling: A challenge for reform. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 387–402.
Sowder, J. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 157–223). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics & Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York: Teachers College Press.
Strutchens, M. E. (2000). Confronting beliefs and stereotypes that impede the mathematical empowerment of African American students. In M. E. Strutchens, M. Johnson, & W. Tate (Eds.), Changing the faces of mathematics: Perspectives on African Americans (pp. 7–14). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Tate, W. F. (1997). Race-ethnicity, SES, gender, and language proficiency trends in mathematics achievement: An update. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 652–679.
Tate, W. F. (2008). The political economy of teacher quality in school mathematics: African American males, opportunity structures, politics, and method. American Behavioral Scientist, 51(7), 953–971.
U. S. Department of Education. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the national mathematics advisory panel. Jessup: Author.
Unger, H. G. (2007). Minority education. Encyclopedia of American education (3rd ed.). New York: Facts on File.
White, D. Y. (2002). Preparing pre-service teachers to work in diverse mathematics classrooms: A challenge for all. The Mathematics Educator, 12(1), 1–4.
Yow, J. A. (2005). The hidden curriculum of algebra. Paper presented at the meeting of the South Eastern association of educational studies conference, Chapel Hill, NC.
Yow, J. A. (2007). A mathematics teacher leader profile: Attributes and actions to improve mathematics teaching and learning. National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 9(2), 45–55.
Acknowledgments
The author wishes to thank Dr. Elizabeth Powers-Costello for initial conversations in conceptualizing this study, Dr. Ed Dickey for feedback and help in thinking through definitions, and Drs. Megan Burton, Christine Lotter, and Stephen Thompson for their feedback on multiple drafts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yow, J.A. Prospective teacher beliefs about liberative and oppressive mathematics teaching practices: a first step toward equitable instruction. J Math Teacher Educ 15, 83–96 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9197-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9197-5