Skip to main content
Log in

Taken-as-shared: a review of common assumptions about mathematical tasks in teacher education

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Throughout, task means mathematics-related task.

  2. The entire selection process of the final papers for this special issue was carried out jointly by the three guest editors, namely, by the two of us together with Orit Zaslavsky.

References

  • Ball, D. L. (2000). Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 241–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. (1986). Diagnostic teaching 2: Developing conflict: Discussion lesson. Mathematics Teaching, 116, 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. (1987). Diagnostic teaching 3: Provoking discussion. Mathematics Teaching, 118, 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A., & Purdy, D. (1986). Diagnostic teaching. Mathematics Teaching, 115, 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, G. (1984). The crucial role of the didactical contract in the analysis and construction of situations in teaching and learning mathematics. In H. Steiner (Ed.), Theory of mathematics education (pp. 110–119). Bielefeld: Institut fur Didaktik der Mathematik der Universitat Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, G. (1986). Fondements et méthodes de la didactique des mathematiques. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 7(2), 33–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: Didactiques des mathématiques, 1970–1990, (trans: Balacheff, N., Cooper, M., Sutherland, R., & Warfield, V.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Brown, S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., & van Lehn, K. (1980). Repair theory: A generative theory of bugs in procedural skills. Cognitive Science, 4, 379–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevallard, Y. (1985). La transposition didactique. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, B., & Walther, G. (1986). Task and activity. In B. Christiansen, G. Howson, & M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives in mathematics education (pp. 243–307). Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. (1996). Teaching mathematics: Towards a sound alternative. New York: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2006). Mathematics-for-teaching: An ongoing investigation of the mathematics that teachers (need to) know. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(3), 293–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, M. (1978). Children’s minds. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, T., & Eisenberg, T. (1991). On the reluctance to visualize in mathematics. In W. Zimmermann & S. Cunningham (Eds.), Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics. MAA Notes No. 19, 25–37.

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, T. (Ed.) (1964). Some lessons in mathematics: A handbook on the teaching of ‘modern’ mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gattegno, C. (1987). The science of education part I: Theoretical considerations. New York: Educational Solutions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study (NCES 2003-013). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

  • Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1993). Instructional tasks, classroom discourse, and student learning in second grade. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 393–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (1992). Doing and construing mathematics in screen space. In B. Southwell, B. Perry, & K. Owens (Eds.), Space – The first and final frontier: Proceedings of the fifteenth annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia (MERGA-15), 1–17. Sydney: University of Western Sydney.

  • Mason, J. (1998). Enabling teachers to be real teachers: Necessary levels of awareness and structure of attention. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 243–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., Gates, P., Griffin, P., & Jaworski, B. (1988). Project mathematics update. Milton Keynes: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2004a). Designing and using mathematical tasks. Milton Keynes: Open University; (2006 reprint) St. Albans: QED.

  • Mason, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2004b). Fundamental constructs in mathematics education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. (1988). Reality: The search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument. Irish Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 25–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener, E. (1978). Understanding understanding mathematics. Cognitive Science, 2, 361–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1972). The principles of genetic epistemology (trans: Mays, W.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  • Piaget, J. (1980). Adaptation and intelligence: Organic selections and phenocopy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, T., Heal, C., Barber, P., & Martyn, S. (1998). Mind the gaps: Primary trainees’ mathematics subject knowledge. In E. Bills (Ed.), Proceedings of the BSRLM day conference at Birmingham (pp. 91–96). Coventry: University of Warwick.

  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge and growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, A., & Stehlikova, N. (2006). Apprehending mathematical structure: A case study of coming to understand a commutative ring. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(3), 347–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R. (1976). Relational and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, B. (1970). The hidden curriculum. New York: Alfred-Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M., Grover, B., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., & Silver, E. A. (1999). The development of professional developers: Learning to assist teachers in new settings in new ways. Harvard Educational Review, 69(3), 237–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahta, D. (1980). About geometry. For the Learning of Mathematics, 1(1), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahta, D., & Brookes, W. (1966). The genesis of mathematical activity. In W. Brookes (Ed.), The development of mathematical activity in children: The place of the problem in this development (pp. 3–8). Slough: ATM, Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127–146). New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. (1947, 2nd edition 1999). Three thousand years of educational wisdom: Selections from great documents. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • van Lehn, K. (1989). Mind bugs. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of the higher psychological processes. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, O. (1995). Open-ended tasks as a trigger for mathematics teachers’ professional development. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(3), 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, O. (2005). Seizing the opportunity to create uncertainty in learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 297–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Watson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watson, A., Mason, J. Taken-as-shared: a review of common assumptions about mathematical tasks in teacher education. J Math Teacher Educ 10, 205–215 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9059-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9059-3

Keywords

Navigation