Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intracortical stiffness of mid-diaphysis femur bovine bone: lacunar–canalicular based homogenization numerical solutions and microhardness measurements

  • Biomaterials Synthesis and Characterization
  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microscale lacunar–canalicular (L-C) porosity is a major contributor to intracortical bone stiffness variability. In this work, such variability is investigated experimentally using micro hardness indentation tests and numerically using a homogenization scheme. Cross sectional rings of cortical bones are cut from the middle tubular part of bovine femur long bone at mid-diaphysis. A series of light microscopy images are taken along a line emanating from the cross-section center starting from the ring’s interior (endosteum) ring surface toward the ring’s exterior (periosteum) ring surface. For each image in the line, computer vision analysis of porosity is conducted employing an image segmentation methodology based on pulse coupled neural networks (PCNN) recently developed by the authors. Determined are size and shape of each of the lacunar–canalicular (L-C) cortical micro constituents: lacunae, canaliculi, and Haversian canals. Consequently, it was possible to segment and quantify the geometrical attributes of all individual segmented pores leading to accurate determination of derived geometrical measures such as L-C cortical pores’ total porosity (pore volume fraction), (elliptical) aspect ratio, orientation, location, and number of pores in secondary and primary osteons. Porosity was found to be unevenly (but linearly) distributed along the interior and exterior regions of the intracortical bone. The segmented L-C porosity data is passed to a numerical microscale-based homogenization scheme, also recently developed by the authors, that analyses a composite made up of lamella matrix punctuated by multi-inclusions and returns corresponding values for longitudinal and transverse Young's modulus (matrix stiffness) for these micro-sized spatial locations. Hence, intracortical stiffness variability is numerically quantified using a combination of computer vision program and numerical homogenization code. These numerically found stiffness values of the homogenization solution are corroborated experimentally using microhardness indentation measurements taken at the same points that the digital images were taken along a radial distance emanating from the interior (endosteum) surface toward the bone’s exterior (periosteum) surface. Good agreement was found between numerically calculated and indentation measured stiffness of Intracortical lamellae. Both indentation measurements and numerical solutions of matrix stiffness showed increasing linear trend of compressive longitudinal modulus (E11) values vs. radial position for both interior and exterior regions. In the interior (exterior) region of cortical bone, stiffness modulus values were found to range from 18.5 to 23.4 GPa (23 to 26.0 GPa) with the aggregate stiffness of the cortical lamella in the exterior region being 12% stiffer than that in the interior region. In order to further validate these findings, experimental and FEM simulation of a mid-diaphysis bone ring under compression is employed. The FEM numerical deflections employed nine concentric regions across the thickness with graded stiffness values based on the digital segmentation and homogenization scheme. Bone ring deflections are found to agree well with measured deformations of the compression bone ring.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Currey JD. The structure and mechanics of bone. J Mater Sci. 2012;47:41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor D. Fracture and repair of bone: a multiscale problem. J Mater Sci. 2007;42:8911–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. An YH, Draughn RA (1999) Mechanical testing of bone and the bone-implant interface. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida 33431.

  4. Ethier CR, Simmons CA (2007) Introductory biomechanics: from cells to organisms. Cambridge University Press, New York.

  5. Wang X, Nyman JS, Dong X, Leng H, Reyes M. Fundamental biomechanics in bone tissue engineering. Synth Lectures Tissue Eng. 2010;2(1):1–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pithioux M, Lasaygues P, Chabrand P. An alternative ultrasonic method for measuring the elastic properties of cortical bone. J Biomech. 2002;35(7):961–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zysset PK, Guo XE, Hoffler CE, Moore KE, Goldstein SA. Elastic modulus and hardness of cortical and trabecular bone lamellae measured by nanoindentation in the human femur. J Biomech. 1999;32(10):1005–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rho JY, et al. Microstructural elasticity and regional heterogeneity in human femoral bone of various ages examined by nano-indentation. J Biomech. 2002;35(2):189–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hage IS, Hamade RF. Distribution of Porosity in Cortical (Bovine) Bone. Houston, TX: ASME 2015 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition; 2015. p. V003T03A085–V003T03A085. November 13-19

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hage IS, Hamade RF. Geometric-attributes-based segmentation of cortical bone slides using optimized neural networks. J Bone Miner Metab. 2016;34(3):251–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hage IS, Hamade RF. Segmentation of histology slides of cortical bone using pulse coupled neural networks optimized by particle-swarm optimization. Comput Med Imag Grap. 2013;37(7):466–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hage IS, Hamade RF, Cortical Porosity's Area Fractions and Aspect Ratios, in review.

  13. Hage IS, Hamade RF, An experimentally validated combined stiffness formulation for a finite domain considering volume fraction, shape, orientation, and location of a single inclusion, in review

  14. Hage IS, Hamade RF, Experimentally validated combined stiffness formulation for a finite domain considering volume fractions, shapes, orientations, locations, and number of multiple inclusions, in review

  15. Oliver WC, Pharr GM. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res. 1992;7(6):1564–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oliver WC, Pharr GM. Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J Mater Res. 2004;19(1):3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Budyn É, Thierry H. Analysis of micro fracture in human Haversian cortical bone under transverse tension using extended physical imaging. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2010;82(8):940–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gupta S, Prosenjit D. Bone geometry and mechanical properties of the human scapula using computed tomography data. Trends Biomater Artif Organs. 2004;17(2):61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ivan, A (1983) On the Ring Compression Test. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, United States

  20. Torres LA, Ghavami K, Garcia JJ. A transversely isotropic law for the determination of the circumferential young's modulus of bamboo with diametric compression tests. Lat Am Appl Res. 2007;37(4):255–60.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Taylor WR, et al. Determination of orthotropic bone elastic constants using FEA and modal analysis. J Biomech. 2002;35(6):767–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was made possible by the financial support of the Lebanese National Council for Scientific Research (CNRS) Award Number 103087. The authors also wish to acknowledge the support of the University Research Board at AUB. Also acknowledged is bone CT scanning performed by the Radiology Department at the American University of Beirut Medical center (AUBMC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramsey F. Hamade.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hage, I.S., Hamade, R.F. Intracortical stiffness of mid-diaphysis femur bovine bone: lacunar–canalicular based homogenization numerical solutions and microhardness measurements. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 28, 135 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-017-5924-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-017-5924-5

Navigation