Skip to main content
Log in

Capillary action: enrichment of retention and habitation of cells via micro-channeled scaffolds for massive bone defect regeneration

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of a biomaterial substitute that can promote bone regeneration in massive defects has remained as a significant clinical challenge even using bone marrow cells or growth factors. Without an active, thriving cell population present throughout and stable anchored to the construct, exceptional bone regeneration does not occur. An engineered micro-channel structures scaffold within each trabecular has been designed to overcome some current limitations involving the cultivation and habitation of cells in large, volumetric scaffolds to repair massive skeletal defect. We created a scaffold with a superior fluid retention capacity that also may absorb bone marrow cells and provide growth factor-containing body fluids such as blood clots and/or serum under physiological conditions. The scaffold is composed of 3 basic structures (1) porous trabecular network (300–400 μm) similar to that of human trabecular bones, (2) micro-size channels (25–70 μm) within each trabecular septum which mimic intra-osseous channels such as Haversian canals and Volkmann’s canals with body fluid access, diffusion, nutritional supply and gas exchange, and (3) nano-size pores (100–400 nm) on the surface of each septum that allow immobilized cells to anchor. Combinatorial effects of these internal structures result in a host-adapting construct that enhances cell retention and habitation throughout the 3 cm-height and 4 cm-length bridge-shaped scaffold.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 2005;26:5474–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vats A, Tolley NS, Polak JM, Gough JE. Scaffolds and biomaterials for tissue engineering: a review of clinical applications. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003;28:165–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hutmacher DW. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials. 2000;21:2529–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arinzeh TL, Tran T, Mcalary J, Daculsi G. A comparative study of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics for human mesenchymal stem-cell-induced bone formation. Biomaterials. 2005;26:3631–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zou XH, Cai HX, Yin Z, Chen X, Jiang YZ, Hu H, Ouyang HW. A novel strategy incorporated the power of mesenchymal stem cells to allografts for segmental bone tissue engineering. Cell Transplant. 2009;18:433–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ono I, Yamashita T, Jin HY, Ito Y, Hamada H, Akasaka Y, et al. Combination of porous hydroxyapatite and cationic liposomes as a vector for BMP-2 gene therapy. Biomaterials. 2004;25:4709–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Woodard JR, Hilldore AJ, Lan SK, Park CJ, Morgan AW, Eurell JA, et al. The mechanical properties and osteoconductivity of hydroxyapatite bone scaffolds with multi-scale porosity. Biomaterials. 2007;28:45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Manjubala I, Woesz A, Pilz C, Rumpler M, Fratzl-Zelman N, Roschger P, et al. Biomimetic mineral-organic composite scaffolds with controlled internal architecture. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2005;16:1111–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Unger RE, Sartoris A, Peters K, Motta A, Migliaresi C, Kunkel M, et al. Tissue-like self-assembly in cocultures of endothelial cells and osteoblasts and the formation of microcapillary like structures on three-dimensional porous biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2007;28:3965–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldstein AS, Juarez TM, Helmke CD, Gustin MC, Mikos AG. Effect of convection on osteoblastic cell growth and function in biodegradable polymer foam scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2001;22:1279–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hofmann S, Hagenmüller H, Koch AM, Müller R, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Kaplan DL, et al. Control of in vitro tissue-engineered bone-like structures using human mesenchymal stem cells and porous silk scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2007;28:1152–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gauthier O, Bouler JM, Aguado E, Pilet P, Daculsi G. Macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics: influence of macropore diameter and macroporosity percentage on bone ingrowth. Biomaterials. 1998;19:133–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bignon A, Chouteau J, Chevalier J, Fantozzi G, Carret JP, Chavassieux P, et al. Effect of micro- and macroporosity of bone substitutes on their mechanical properties and cellular response. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2003;14:1089–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mathieu LM, Mueller TL, Bourban PE, Pioletti DP, Muller R, Manson JA. Architecture and properties of anisotropic polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27(6):905–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsutsumi H, Shibasaki Y, Onimura K, Oishi T. Preparation of photo-patterned polymer–hydroxyapatite composites. Polymer. 2003;44(20):6297–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Y-W, Wu Q, Chen J, Chen GQ. Evaluation of three-dimensional scaffolds made of blends of hydroxyapatite and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) for bone reconstruction. Biomaterials. 2005;26(8):899–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim S-S, Sun Park M, Jeon O, Yong Choi C, Kim B-S. Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27(8):1399–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mathieu LM, Mueller TL, Bourban PE, Pioletti DP, Müller R, Månson JA. Architecture and properties of anisotropic polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27:905–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang YW, Wu Q, Chen J, Chen GQ. Evaluation of three-dimensional scaffolds made of blends of hydroxyapatite and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) for bone reconstruction. Biomaterials. 2005;26:899–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim SS, Sun Park M, Jeon O, Yong Choi C, Kim B-S. Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27:1399–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sachlos E, Czernuszka JT. Making tissue engineering scaffolds work. Review: the application of solid freeform fabrication technology to the production of tissue engineering scaffolds. Eur Cells Mater. 2003;5:29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hutmacher DW, Sittinger M, Risbud MV. Scaffold-based tissue engineering: rationale for computer-aided design and solid free-form fabrication systems. Trends Biotechnol. 2004;22:354–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sachlos E, Czernuszka JT. Making tissue engineering scaffolds work. Review on the application of solid freeform fabrication technology to the production of tissue engineering scaffolds. Eur Cell Mater. 2003;5:29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oh DS, Kim YH, Ganbat D, Han MH, Lim PH, Back JH, et al. Bone marrow absorption and retention properties of engineered scaffolds with micro-channels and nano-pores for tissue engineering: a proof of concept. Ceram Int. 2013;39:8401–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. COMSOL CFD Module User’s Guide. Comsol AB. 2010.

  26. Mitton D, Cendre E, Roux JP, Arlot ME, Peix G, Rumelhart C, et al. Mechanical properties of ewe vertebral cancellous bone compared with histomorphometry and high-resolution computed tomography parameters. Bone. 1998;22(6):651–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Goldstein SA. The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomic location and function. J Biomech. 1987;20(11–12):1055–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rosenson RS, McCormick A, Uretz EF. Distribution of blood viscosity values and biochemical correlates in healthy adults. Clin Chem. 1996;42:1189–95.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rosina J, Kvasnák E, Suta D, Kolárová H, Málek J, Krajci L. Temperature dependence of blood surface tension. Physiol Res. 2007;56:S93–8.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cohen IM, Kundu PK. Fluid mechanics. 4th ed. Burlington; 2007. p. 765–830.

  31. Tsuruga E, Takita H, Itoh H, Wakisaka Y, Kuboki Y. Pore size of porous hydroxyapatite as the cell-substratum controls BMP-induced osteogenesis. J Biochem. 1997;121:317–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yuan H, Kurashina K, de Bruin JD, Li Y, de Groot K, Zhang X. A preliminary study on osteoinduction of two kinds of calcium phosphate ceramics. Biomaterials. 1999;20:1799–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wan Y, Wang Y, Liu Z, Qu X, Han B, Bei J, Wang S. Adhesion and proliferation of OCT-1 osteoblast-like cells on micro- and nano-scale topography structured poly(l-lactide). Biomaterials. 2005;26:4453–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao L, Mei S, Chu PK, Zhang Y, Wu Z. The influence of hierarchical hybrid micro/nano-textured titanium surface with titania nanotubes on osteoblast functions. Biomaterials. 2010;31:5072–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was partially supported by National Agenda Project (NAP) funded by Korea Research Council of Fundamental Science & Technology (P-09-JC-LU63-C01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel S. Oh.

Additional information

Min-Ho Hong and Yoon Hyuk Kim are equally contributed for this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hong, MH., Kim, Y.H., Ganbat, D. et al. Capillary action: enrichment of retention and habitation of cells via micro-channeled scaffolds for massive bone defect regeneration. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 25, 1991–2001 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5225-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5225-1

Keywords

Navigation