Abstract
Mechanical properties and microstructure characterization of a series of graded commercial rigid polyurethane foams commonly used to mimic trabecular bone in testing orthopaedic devices is reported. Compressive testing conducted according to ASTM standard F1839-08, which requires large specimens (50.8 mm × 50.8 mm × 25.4 mm blocks) gave elastic modulus and compressive strength values ranging from 115 to 794 MPa and 4.7 to 24.7 MPa, respectively, for foams having densities of 0.240–0.641 g/cm3. All these results were within the requirements of the specification for the corresponding grades. Compression testing using smaller specimens (7.5 mm diameter × 15 mm) typical of testing bone, gave results in good agreement with those obtained in the standard tests. Microstructural measurements showed the average pore size ranged from 125 to 234 μm for densities ranging from 0.641 to 0.159 g/cm3, respectively. The relative modulus as a function of relative density of the foams fit well to the model of Gibson and Ashby. Cyclic testing revealed hysteresis in the lower density foams with a loading modulus statistically equivalent to that measured in monotonic testing. Shore DO durometry (hardness) measurements show good correlations to elastic modulus and compressive strength. The results suggest additional parameters to consider for the evaluation of polyurethane foams for bone analog applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Thompson MS, McCarthy ID, Lidgren L, Ryd L. Compressive and shear properties of commercially available polyurethane foams. J Biomech. 2003;125:732–4. doi:10.1115/1.1614820.
Palissery V, Taylor M, Browne M. Fatigue characterization of a polymer foam to use as a cancellous bone analog material in the assessment of orthopaedic devices. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2004;15:61–7. doi:10.1023/B:JMSM.0000010098.65572.3b.
American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM F1839, standard specification for rigid polyurethane foam for use as a standard material for testing orthopaedic devices and instruments. West Conshohocken: ASTM; 2008. doi:10.1520/F1839-08.
Szivek JA, Thomas M, Benjamin JB. Characterization of a synthetic foam as a model for human cancellous bone. J Appl Biomater. 1993;4:269–72. doi:10.1002/jab.770040309.
Szivek JA, Thompson JD, Benjamin JB. Characterization of three formulations of a synthetic foam as models for a range of human cancellous bone types. J Appl Biomater. 1995;6:125–8. doi:10.1002/jab.770060207.
Hein TJ, Hotchkiss R, Perissinotto A, Chao EYS. Analysis of bone model material for external fracture fixation experiments. Biomed Sci Instrum. 1987;22:43–8.
Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. Cellular solids. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
Patel MF, Finnie I. Structural features and mechanical properties of rigid cellular plastics. J Mater. 1970;5:909–32.
Rehkopf JD, McNeice GM, Brodland GW. Fluid and matrix components of polyurethane foam behavior under cyclic compression. J Eng Mater Technol. 1996;118:58–62. doi:10.1007/BF02328691.
Shen Y, Golnaraghi F, Plumtree A. Modeling compressive cyclic stress-strain behaviour of structural foam. Int J Fatigue. 2001;23:491–7. doi:10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00014-7.
American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM F1839, standard specification for rigid polyurethane foam for use as a standard material for testing orthopaedic devices and instruments. West Conshohocken: ASTM; 1997. doi:10.1520/F1839-97.
American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM F1839, standard specification for rigid polyurethane foam for use as a standard material for testing orthopaedic devices and instruments. West Conshohocken: ASTM; 2001. doi:10.1520/F1839-01.
American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM D1621 standard test method for compressive properties of rigid cellular plastics. West Conshohocken: ASTM; 2004. doi:10.1520/D1621-04A.
Underwood EE. Quantitative stereology. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1970.
Røhl L, Larsen E, Linde F, Odgaard A, Jørgensen J. Tensile and compressive properties of cancellous bone. J Biomech. 1991;24:1143–9. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(91)90006-9.
Williams JL, Lewis JL. Properties and an anisotropic model of cancellous bone from the procimal tibial epiphysis. J Biomech Eng. 1982;104:50–6.
Rice JC, Cowin SC, Bowman JA. On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. J Biomech. 1988;21:155–68.
American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM D2240-05, standard test method for rubber property-durometer hardness. West Conshohocken: ASTM; 2005. doi:10.1520/D2240-05.
Lee ST, Ramesh NS, editors. Polymeric foams: mechanisms and materials. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2004.
Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. The mechanics of three-dimensional cellular materials. Proc R Soc Lond A. 1982;382:43–59. doi:10.1098/rspa.1982.0088.
Roff WJ, Scott JR. Fibers, films, plastics and rubbers: a handbook of common polymers. London: Butterworths; 1971.
General Plastics. Interactive datasheets. 2009. http://www.generalplastics.com/products/idatasheets.php. Accessed 15 June 2009.
Acknowledgments
Support for this research by Zimmer, Inc., Warsaw, IN, is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Calvert, K.L., Trumble, K.P., Webster, T.J. et al. Characterization of commercial rigid polyurethane foams used as bone analogs for implant testing. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 21, 1453–1461 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-010-4024-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-010-4024-6