Skip to main content
Log in

Feasibility of biodegradable PLGA common bile duct stents: An in vitro and in vivo study

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study investigates the feasibility of using a biodegradable polymeric stent in common bile duct (CBD) repair and reconstruction. Here, poly(l-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA, molar ratio LA/GA = 80/20) was processed into a circular tube- and dumbbell-shaped specimens to determine the in vitro degradation behavior in bile. The morphology, weight loss, and molecular weight changes were then investigated in conjunction with evaluations of the mechanical properties of the specimen. Circular tube-shaped PLGA stents with X-ray opacity were subsequently used in common bile duct exploration (CBDE) and primary suturing in canine models. Next, X-ray images of CBD stents in vivo were compared and levels of serum liver enzymes and a histological analysis were conducted after stent transplantation. The results showed that the PLGA stents exhibited the required biomedical properties and spontaneously disappeared from CBDs in 4–5 weeks. The degradation period and function match the requirements in repair and reconstruction of CBDs to support the duct, guide bile drainage, and reduce T-tube-related complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.L. Freeman, Tech. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2, 120 (2001). doi:10.1053/tgie.2001.22150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. G. Ginsberg, C. Cope, J. Shah, T. Martin, A. Carty, P. Habecker, C. Kaufmann, C.L. Clerc, J.P.N.P. TöRMäLä, Gastrointest. Endosc. 58, 777 (2003). doi:10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02016-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Tashiro, T. Ogawa, T. Itamoto, Y. Ushitora, Y. Tanimoto, A. Oshita, H. Amano,T. Asahara, J. Surg. Res. 1, 85 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A.K. Seale, W.P. Ledet Jr, Arch. Surg. 134, 22 (1999). doi:10.1001/archsurg.134.1.22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. A.M. Isla, J. Griniatsos, A.J. Wan, Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A. 12, 207 (2002). doi:10.1089/10926420260188128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J.S. Wu, N.J. Soper, Surg. Endosc. 16, 1309 (2002). doi:10.1007/s004640080016

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Z. Tu, J. Li, H. Xin, Q. Zhu, T. Cai, Dig. Surg. 16, 137 (1999). doi:10.1159/000018706

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. J.L. Ponsky, B.T. Heniford, K. Gersin, Am. Surg. 66, 262 (2000)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J.A. Williams, P.J. Treacy, P. Sidey, C.S. Worthley, N.C. Townsend, E.A. Russell, Aust. N. Z. J. Surg. 12, 823 (1994). doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.1994.tb04556.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. T. Kusano, T. Isa, H. Shimoji, H. Miyazato, Y. Muto, M. Furukawa, Hepatogastroenterology 29, 2776 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. P.B. Cotton, Am. J. Surg. 165, 474 (1993). doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80944-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. J.R. Francoeur, K. Wiseman, A.K. Buczkowski, S.W. Chung, C.H. Scudamore, Am. J. Surg. 185, 468 (2003). doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00056-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. D.N. Reed Jr, G.C. Vitale, W.R. Wrightson, M. Edwards, K. Mcmasters, Am. J. Surg. 185, 316 (2003). doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(02)01419-8

    Google Scholar 

  14. Q.G. Liu, Z.M. Geng, S.L. Wu, Y.M. Yao, H. Sun, C.E. Pan, Hapatobiliary Parcreat. Dis. Int. 2, 265 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Hastier, M.J.M. Buckley, E.P. Peten, R. Dumas, J. Delmont, Am. J. Gastroenterol. 7, 1947 (1999). doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01235.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J.G. Zografakis, B.T. Jones, R. Ravichardran, M.M. Evancho-Chapman, S.P. Schmidt, D. Arends, K.M. Funk, P. Gingras, Curr. Surg. 4, 437 (2003). doi:10.1016/S0149-7944(02)00726-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J.G. Mc Nulty, N. Hickey, J. Thornton, D.H. Osborne, Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2, 480 (1999). doi:10.1016/S0002-9270(98)00762-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Inal, E. Aksungur, E. Akgiil, O. Demirbas, M. Oguz, E. Erkoçak, Am. J. Gastroenterol. 4, 1069 (2000). doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01944.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Y.M. Han, H.S. Kwak, G.Y. Jin, S.O. Lee, G.H. Chung, Korean J. Radiol. 5, 410 (2007). doi:10.3348/kjr.2007.8.5.410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. E.N. Rees, S.E. Tebbs, J. Hosp. Infect. 39, 323 (1998). doi:10.1016/S0195-6701(98)90298-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. M.J. Yaszmski, R.G. Payne, W.C. Hayes, R. Langer, A.G. Mikos, Biomaterials 17, 175 (1996). doi:10.1016/0142-9612(96)85762-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. T. Isotalo, E. Alarakkola, M. Talja, L.J. Tammela, T. Välimaa, P. Törmälä, Urology 162, 1764 (1999). doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68235-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Shinchi, S. Takao, H. Nishida, T. Aikou, J. Surg. Oncol. 75, 89 (2000). doi:10.1002/1096-9098(200010)75:2<89::AID-JSO3>3.0.CO;2-V

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. S.L. Ishang-Riley, G.M. Crane, A. Gurlek, M.J. Miller, A.W. Yasko, M.J. Yaszemski, A.G. Mikosl, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 36, 1 (1997). doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199707)36:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-P

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Y.P. Li, Y.Y. Pei, X.Y. Zhang, Z.H. Gu, Z.H. Zhou, W.F. Yuan, J.J. Zhou, J.H. Zhu, X.J. Gao, J. Contr. Rel. 71, 203 (2001). doi:10.1016/S0168-3659(01)00218-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. X.Y. Xu, T.J. Liu, K. Zhang, S.H. Liu, Z. Shen, Y.X. Li, X.B. Jing, Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 93, 811 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.01.022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. L. LU, C.A. Garcia, A.G. Mikos, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 46, 230 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. A.L. Wills, K. Gibson, C. Karihaloo, J.O. Jorgensen, Aust. N. Z. J. Surg. 72, 177 (2002). doi:10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02308.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. L. Costa, P. Bracco, S. Vado, L. Trossarelli, K. Jacobson, Biomaterials 22, 3113 (2001). doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00060-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ms. Qizhi Liang & Shuhua Sun for preparing polymer materials and stents. Financial support was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 20274048 and 50373043), and by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Project No. KJCX2-SW-H07). We also acknowledge the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (Project No. NCET-06-0320), and the Cultivation Fund of the Scientific and Technical Innovation Project of Northeast Normal University (Project No. NENU-STB07008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiabin Jing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, X., Liu, T., Liu, S. et al. Feasibility of biodegradable PLGA common bile duct stents: An in vitro and in vivo study. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 20, 1167–1173 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-008-3672-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-008-3672-2

Keywords

Navigation