Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Kink, flow and retention properties of urinary catheters part 1: Conventional foley catheters

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The treatment for urinary incontinence, a common condition affecting a considerable number of older and disabled members of society, involves the use of a Foley catheter for drainage of the bladder. The basic design of the catheter has remained the same for over seventy years. Despite modifications to the materials used there has been very little research directly comparing the physical properties of the different types of catheter. This study developed a range of tests to enable comparison of the resistance to kinking, flow rate properties and the retention forces of both latex-based and all-silicone catheters. The results indicated that the all-silicone device had superior resistance to kinking and better flow properties when compared to the latex-based catheters. However, greater retention forces were recorded for the all-silicone device, in both the inflated and deflated condition, indicating that much more force would be required to remove the this type of catheter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. WINSON, British J. Nursing 6 (1997) 1229.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. I. POMFRET, Nursing Standard 14 (2000) 46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. EVANS, D. PHEBY, et al., British J. Community Nursing 5 (2000) 477.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. N. S. MORRIS, D. J. STICKLER and R. J. C. MCLEAN, World J Urol 17 (1999) 345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. D. DENSTEDT, T. A. WOLLIN and G. REID, J. Endourology 12 (1998) 493.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. L. L. SULLIVAN, B. W. STEINERT, et al., ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings 2 (1995) 2168.

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. S. MORRIS and D. J. STICKLER, Urol Res 26 (1998) 275.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. N. SABBUBA, G. HUGHES and D. J. STICKLER, BJU Intl. 89 (2002) 55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. D. J. STICKLER and N. MORRIS et al. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 17 (1998) 649.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. D. J. STICKLER and G. HUGHES, ibid. 18 (1999) 206.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. British Standard 3212. Rubber Tubing. (1997). [WWW] http://bsonline.techindex.co.uk/

  12. British Standard EN 1618. Catheters other than intravascular catheters---test methods for common properties. (1997). [WWW] http://bsonline.techindex.co.uk/

  13. J. PARKIN, J. SCANLAN, M. WOOLLEY, et al., BJU Intl. 90 (2002) 666.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J. ROBINSON, Nursing Standard 17 (2003) 33.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. L. GONZALGO and P. C. WALSH, Urology. 61 (2003) 825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. DANESHMAND D. YOUSSEFZADEH and E. C. SKINNER, Urology. 59 (2002) 127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. G. Turner.

Additional information

Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lawrence, E.L., Turner, I.G. Kink, flow and retention properties of urinary catheters part 1: Conventional foley catheters. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 17, 147–152 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-6818-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-6818-0

Keywords

Navigation