Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro investigation was to compare various roughness and topography measurement methods to characterize the surface quality in several types of resin composites. The initial surface quality of several resin composites was compared. The materials evaluated were of three categories: i) hybrid: TPH Spectrum; ii) reinforced microfill: Micronew and iii) microhybrid: Synergy Duo, Esthet-X, Point.4 and Palfique Estelite. Three Groups of identical disk-shaped specimens (10 × 1.5 mm) were prepared from each material (n = 6) and polished with Soflex discs. Macro-roughness (Ra) was measured with Group 1 by 2-D profilometry. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) gave 3-D images and micro-roughness (Ra) of Group 2. Surface optical gloss at 60 was determined for Group 3. Specimens of each material were also studied by scanning electron microscopy. Macro-Ra values (μm) ranged from 0.30 to 0.56. Micro-Ra values ranged from 0.03 to 0.14 and they differed from macro-Ra values in ranking order. Percentage Gloss values ranged from 30.6 to 70.1%. The results revealed that micro-roughness showed a high correlation with gloss values (r = 0.93), whilst macro-roughness did not (r = 0.62). Moreover, the AFM method showed higher capability to distinguish surface roughness compared with the 2-D profilometry and to reveal more detailed definition of surface texture than the examination under SEM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. TJAN and C. CHAN, J. Prosth. Dent. 61 (1989) 138.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. N. DE JAGER, A. FEILZER and C. L. DAVIDSON, Dent. Mater. 16 (2000) 381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. http://www.dentsply.co.uk/products/products/esthetx.htm.

  4. P. CAMPBELL, W. JOHNSTON and W. J. O’BRIEN, J. Dent. Res. 65 (1986) 892.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D. JUDD and G. WYSZECKI, in “Color in Business, Science and Industry.” (John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, 1975) p. 397.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. WHITEHEAD, A. SHEARER, D. C. WATTS, N. H. F. WILSON, et al., Dent. Mater. 15 (1999) 79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. WENNERBERG, R. OHLSSON, B. G. ROSEN and B. ANDERSSON, Med. Eng. Phys. 18 (1996) 548.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. S. JONIOT, G. GREGOIRE, A. M. AUTHER and Y. M. J. ROQUES, Oper. Dent. 25 (2000) 311.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. S. WHITEHEAD, A. SHEARER, D. C. WATTS and N. H. F. WILSON, J. Oral. Rehab. 22 (1995) 421.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. WHITEHEAD, A. SHEARER, D. C. WATTS and N. H. F. WILSON, Dent. Mater. 12 (1996) 315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. G. MARSHALL, M. BALOOCH, R. J. TENCH, M. KINNEY and S. J. MARSHALL, Dent. Mater. 9 (1993) 265.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. N. SILIKAS, A. R. LENNIE, K. E. R. ENGLAND and D. C. WATTS, Microscopy and Analysis 82 (2001) 19.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. YAP and B. MOK, Oper. Dent. 27 (2002) 161.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. T. RYBA, W. DUNN and D. F. MURCHISON, Oper. Dent. 27 (2002) 243.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. WILDER, E. SWIFT, K. N. MAY, J. Y. THOMPSON and R. A. MCDOUGAL, J. Dent. 28 (2000) 367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. B. VAN MEERBEEK, M. VARGAS, S. INOUE, Y. YOSHIDA, J. PERDIGAO, P. LAMBRECHTS and G. VANHERLE, Am. J. Dent. 13 (2000) 3D.

    Google Scholar 

  17. N. ABU-BAKR, L. HAN, A. OKAMOTO and M. IWAKU, Dent. Mater. J. 20 (2001) 172.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. L. MARIGO, M. RIZZI, G. LA TORRE, G. RUMI, 3-D. Oper. Dent. 26 (2001) 562.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. K. STOUT and L. BLUNT., in “Three-Dimensional Surface Topography” (Penton Press, London, 2000) p. 178.

    Google Scholar 

  20. F. TAY, S. SIKDAR and M. MANNAN, J. Materials Processing Technology 120 (2002) 243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. R. WASSELL, J. F. MCCABE and A. W. WALLS, Dent. Mater. 10 (1994) 269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. C. BOLLEN, P. LAMBRECHTS and M. QUIRYNEN, Dent. Mater. 13 (1997) 258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. R. WEITMAN and W. EAMES, Oral Health 65 (1975) 29.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. R. WEITMAN and W. EAMES, J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 91 (1975) 101.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. H. SHINTANI, J. SATOU, H. HAYASHIHARA and T. INOUE, Dent. Mater. 1 (1985) 225.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. K. CHUNG, Dent. Mater. 10 (1994) 325.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. F. BILLMEYER and R. ABRAMS, J. Paint. Technol. 45 (1973) 23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. I. BRIDGEMAN, in “The nature of light and its interaction with matter. Colour physics for industry” (H Charlesworth & Co Ltd, Huddersfield, 1987) p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. HUNTER, in “The measurement of appearance” (Wiley, New York, 1975) p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Rahiotis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kakaboura, A., Fragouli, M., Rahiotis, C. et al. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 18, 155–163 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8

Keywords

Navigation