Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Negative Poisson’s ratio in 2D Voronoi cellular solids by biaxial compression: a numerical study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 2D (two-dimensional) random cellular solid model was built using FEM (finite element method) based on a modified Voronoi tessellation technique. A sequence of permanent biaxial compression deformations was applied on the model to obtain a series of re-entrant random cellular solid structures with different area compression ratios. The Poisson’s ratio and energy absorption capacity of cellular solid models with different initial relative densities (0.032 and 0.039) were studied at different area compression ratios. The results showed that the Poisson’s ratio first decreased and then increased with increasing compression strain. A minimum Poisson’s ratio of approximately −0.38 was achieved with an appropriate compression strain. An empirical fitting rule was established which can best fit the 2D simulation to 3D experimental results for foams. The cellular solids with minimum negative Poisson’s ratio can exhibit the highest energy absorption capacity. Furthermore, mechanical properties of the random cellular solid model were compared with 2D regular honeycomb models with both concave- and convex-shaped cells. Results showed that the energy absorption capacity of the three models increased with an increasing dynamic compression velocity. The random foam model exhibited the highest increase rate in energy absorption capacity with the increasing compression velocity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1988) Cellular solids: structure & properties. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF, Schajer GS, Robertson CI (1982) The mechanics of two dimensional cellular solids. Proc R Soc Lond A382:25–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kolpakov AG (1985) On the determination of the averaged moduli of elastic gridworks. Prikl Mat Mekh 59:969–977

    Google Scholar 

  4. Karakoç Alp, Freund Jouni (2012) Experimental studies on mechanical properties of cellular structures using Nomex® honeycomb cores. Compos Struct 94:2017–2024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Karakoç Alp, Santaoja Kari, Freund Jouni (2013) Simulation experiments on the effective in-plane compliance of the honeycomb materials. Compos Struct 96:312–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wojciechowski KW (1987) Constant thermodynamic tension Monte Carlo studies of elastic properties of a two-dimensional systems of hard cyclic hexamers. Mol Phys 61:1247–1258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grima JN, Alderson A, Evans KE (2005) Auxetic behaviour from rotating rigid units. Phys Status Solidi (b) 242:561–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Milton G (1992) Composite materials with Poisson’s ratios close to −1. J Mech Phys Solids 40:1105–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lakes RS (1987) Foam structures with a negative Poisson’s ratio. Science 235:1038–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li Dong, Dong Liang, Lakes RS (2013) The properties of copper foams with negative Poisson’s ratio via resonant ultrasound spectroscopy. physica status solidi (b) 250(10):1983–1987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Friis EA, Lakes RS, Park JB (1988) Negative Poisson’s ratio polymeric and metallic foams. J Mater Sci 23:4406–4414. doi:10.1007/BF00551939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lakes RS, Elms K (1993) Indentability of conventional and negative Poisson’s ratio foams. J Compos Mater 27:1193–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Timoshenko SP, Goodier JN (1969) Theory of elasticity. McGraw-Hill, New york

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu HX, Knott JF, Mills NJ (1997) Analysis of the elastic properties of open-cell foams with tetrakaidecahedral cells. J Mech Phys Solids 45:319–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Choi JB, Lakes RS (1995) Nonlinear analysis of the Poisson’s ratio of negative Poisson’s ratio foams. J Compos Mater 29(1):113–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Silva MJ, Gibson LJ (1997) The effects of non-periodic microstructure and defects on the compressive strength of two-dimensional cellular solids. Int J Mech Sci 39:549–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Silva MJ, Hayes WC, Gibson LJ (1995) The effects of non-periodic microstructure on the elastic properties of two-dimensional cellular solids. Int J Mech Sci 11:1161–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen C, Lu TJ, Fleck NA (1999) Effect of imperfections on the yielding of two-dimensional foams. J Mech Phys Solids 47:2235–2272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu HX, Hobdell JR, Windle AH (2000) Effects of cell irregularity on the elastic properties of open-cell foams. Acta Mater 48:4893–4900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Roberts AP, Garboczi EJ (2001) Elastic moduli of model random three-dimensional closed-cell cellular solids. Acta Mater 49:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu HX, Windle AH (2002) Effects of cell irregularity on the high strain compression of open-cell foams. Acta Mater 50:1041–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kraynik AM, Reinelt DA, van Swol F (2004) Structure of random foam. Phys Rev Lett 93:208301-1–208301-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li K, Gao XL, Subhash G (2006) Effects of cell shape and strut cross-sectional area variations on the elastic properties of three-dimensional open-cell foams. J Mech Phys Solids 54:783–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bouakba M, Bezazi A, Scarpa F (2012) FE analysis of the in-plane mechanical properties of a novel Voronoi-type lattice with positive and negative Poisson’s ratio configurations. Int J Solids Struct 49:2450–2459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Papka SD, Kyriakides S (1999) In-plane biaxial crushing of honeycombs part II: analysis. Int J Solids Struct 36:4397–4423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ashby MF, Evans AG, Fleck NA, Gibson LJ, Hutchinson JW, Wadley HNG (2000) Metal foams: a design guide. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rosakis P, Ruina A, Lakes RS (1993) Microbuckling instability in elastomeric cellular solids. J Mater Sci 28:4667–4672. doi:10.1007/BF00414256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moore B, Jaglinski T, Stone DS, Lakes RS (2007) On the bulk modulus of open cell foams. Cell Polym 26:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  29. Scarpa F, Yates JR, Ciffo LG, Patsias S (2002) Dynamic crushing of auxetic open-cell polyurethane foam. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C 216(12):1153–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Allen T, Shepherd J, Hewage TAM, Senior T, Foster L, Alderson A (2015) Low-kinetic energy impact response of auxetic and conventional open-cell polyurethane foams. phys status solidi (b) 252(7):1631–1639

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by “The National Natural Science Foundation of China (11304033) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (N150504006)”. The first author would also like to thank the financial support from the China Scholars Council (File No. 201506085013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, D., Dong, L., Yin, J. et al. Negative Poisson’s ratio in 2D Voronoi cellular solids by biaxial compression: a numerical study. J Mater Sci 51, 7029–7037 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9992-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9992-6

Keywords

Navigation