Skip to main content
Log in

The behaviour of double oxide film defects in Al–4.5 wt% Mg melt

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The possibility of bonding of the two layers of a double oxide film defect when held in a liquid Al–4.5 wt% Mg alloy was investigated. The defect was modelled experimentally by maintaining two aluminium oxide layers in contact with each other in an Al–4.5 wt% Mg liquid alloy at 750 °C from 2 min to 16 h. Any changes in the composition and morphology of these layers were studied by SEM, EDX and XRD. The results showed that in contrast to previous studies reported in the literature on Al–0.3 wt% Mg in which the two layers bonded to each other after a holding time of 5 h, no bonding took place between the two oxide layers even after a holding time of 16 h. Based on the comparison between the two studies, it was concluded that a transformation involving rearrangement of atoms at the interface between the two oxide layers is essential for the bonding to take place between the two oxide layers. This criterion could be used to predict the bonding behaviour of oxide film defects when held in different liquid aluminium alloys, or when subjected to a HIPping process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Campbell J (2003) Castings, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fox S, Campbell J (2000) Scr Mater 43:881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Griffiths WD, Raiszadeh R (2009) J Mater Sci 44:3402. doi:10.1007/s10853-009-3450-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dispinar D, Campbell J (2004) Int J Cast Met Res 17:280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dispinar D, Campbell J (2004) Int J Cast Met Res 17:287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cao X, Campbell J (2003) Metall Mater Trans A 34A:1409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nyahumwa C, Green NR, Campbell J (1998) AFS Trans 58:215

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nyahumwa C, Green NR, Campbell J (2001) Metall Mater Trans 32A:349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Raiszadeh R, Griffiths WD (2006) Metall Mater Trans B 37B:865

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Raiszadeh R, Griffiths WD (2008) Metall Mater Trans B 39B:298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aryafar M, Raiszadeh R (2010) J Mater Sci 45:3041. doi:10.1007/s10853-010-4308-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Drouzy M, Mascre C (1969) Metall Rev 14:25

    Google Scholar 

  13. Impey S, Stephenson D, Nicholls JR (1990) A study of the effect of magnesium additions on the oxide growth morphologies on liquid aluminium alloys. In: International conference on the microscopy of oxidation, Institute of Metals, University of Cambridge, England, pp 238–244

  14. Tenorio JAS, Espinosa DCR (2000) Oxid Met 53:361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Silva MP, Talbot DEJ (1989) Oxidation of liquid aluminum-magnesium alloys. In: Technical Sessions, TMS Light Metals Committee, 118th Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, pp 1035

  16. Cochran CN, Belitskus DL, Kinosz DL (1977) Metall Trans 8B:323

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Field DJ, Scamans GM, Butler EP (1987) Metall Trans 18A:463

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brandes EA, Brook GB (1999) Smithells metals reference book, 7th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramin Raiszadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Najafzadeh Bakhtiarani, F., Raiszadeh, R. The behaviour of double oxide film defects in Al–4.5 wt% Mg melt. J Mater Sci 46, 1305–1315 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4916-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4916-3

Keywords

Navigation