Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of polyurethane composition and the fabrication process on scaffold properties

  • Syntactic and Composite Foams
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The microdomain structure of polyurethanes (PUR) determines their unique physical properties and makes polyurethanes attractive candidates for various tissue engineering applications. 3D scaffolds based on polyurethanes with different contents of hard segments were fabricated by a salt-leaching/polymer coagulation method. The process parameters were carefully considered, particularly the polymer solution concentration and characteristics of the polyurethane, which are the critical parameters for the control of porosity and pore size distribution. In this study, 3D polyurethane scaffolds were fabricated with interconnected pores and porosity from 64% to 80%. Pore size distribution was evaluated using quantitative image analysis and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). The scaffolds fabricated from polyurethanes with 70 wt.% of hard-domain content were found to have the best compression properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Palsson B, Hubbell JA, Plonsey R et al (2003) Tissue engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bronzino JD (2006) Tissue engineering and artificial organs. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Oh SH, Park IK, Kim JM et al (2007) Biomaterials 28:1664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang Z, Wang Z, Liu S et al (2004) Biomaterials 25:177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wei HJ, Liang H Ch, Lee MH et al (2005) Biomaterials 26:1905–1913

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Whang K, Healy KE, Elenz DR et al (1999) Tissue Eng 5:35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lu JX, Flautre B, Anselme K (1999) J Mater Sci Mater Med 10:111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D (2005) Biomaterials 26:5474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hutmacher DW (2000) Biomaterials 21:2529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang J, Zhang H, Wu L, Ding J (2006) J Mater Sci 41:1725. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-2873-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Draghi L, Resta S, Pirozzolo MG, Tanzi MC (2005) J Mater Sci Mater Med 16:1093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen G, Ushida T, Tateishi T (2001) Mater Sci Eng C 17:63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mikos AG, Thorsen AJ, Czerwonka LA et al (1994) Polymer 35(5):1068

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Tienen TG, Heijkants RGJC, Buma P et al (2002) Biomaterials 23:1731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hou Q, Grijpma DW, Feijen J (2003) Biomaterials 24:1937

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim SS, Park MS, Jeon O et al (2006) Biomaterials 27:1399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hentze HP, Antonietti M (2002) Rev Mol Biotechnol 90:27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lamba NMK, Woodhouse KA, Cooper SL (1997) Polyurethanes in biomedical applications. CRC Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chen KS, Leon Yu T, Chen YS et al (2001) J Polym Res 82:99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanchez-Adsuar MS (2000) Int J Adhes Adhes 20:291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ioan S, Grigorescu G (2002) Eur Polym J 38:2295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tang YW, Labow RS, Santerre JP (2001) J Biomed Mater Res (2001) 56(4):516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Takahara A, Tashita J, Kajiyama T et al (1985) J Biomed Mater Res 19:13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Guan J, Fujimoto KL, Sacksa MS, Wagner WR (2005) Biomaterials 26:3961

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Riboldi SA, Sampaolesi M, Neuenschwander P, Cossu G, Mantero S (2005) Biomaterials 26:4606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Grad S, Kupcsik L, Gorna K et al (2003) Biomaterials 24:5163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang J, Doll BA, Beckman EJ et al (2003) J Biomed Mater Res 67A:389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Groot JH, Nijenhuis AJ, Bruin P et al (1990) Colloid Polym Sci 268:1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wojnar L, Kurzydłowski KJ, Szala J (2002) Praktyka analizy obrazu Polskie Towarzystwo Steorologiczne, Kraków

  30. Ho ST, Hutmacher DW (2006) Biomaterials 27:1362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hou Q, Grijpma DW, Feijen J (2003) Biomaterials 24:1937–1947

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Heijkants RGJC, van Tienen TG, de Groot JH et al (2006) J Mater Sci 41:2423. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-7065-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee HK, Kimb JY, Kimb YD, Shinb JY, Kimb SC (2001) Polymer 42:3893

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Nam YS, Park TG (1999) Biomaterials 20:1783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hacker M, Ringhofer M, Appel B et al (2007) Biomaterials 28:3497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Reignier J, Huneault MA (2006) Polymer 47:4703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This scientific work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education, grant R1301901. The authors wish to thank Professor Andrzej Dworak and Dr. Barbara Trzebicka of Centre of Polymer and Carbon Materials Polish Academy of Sciences for the GPC measurements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monika Bil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bil, M., Ryszkowska, J. & Kurzydłowski, K.J. Effect of polyurethane composition and the fabrication process on scaffold properties. J Mater Sci 44, 1469–1476 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-3037-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-3037-8

Keywords

Navigation