Skip to main content
Log in

Formability of continuous cast 5052 alloy thin sheets

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The formability of continuous cast 5052 alloy thin sheets from two different process schedules was examined. One was prepared in the laboratory by cold-rolling from a continuous cast thick plate followed by annealing (lab-processed sheet), and the other was produced by a new process involving hot-rolling followed immediately by in-line annealing (in-line annealed sheet). Tensile test results indicate that all the lab-processed sheets exhibit evident yield behavior. Increasing rolling reduction results in an increase of strength and a decrease of ductility in the lab-processed sheets due to increasing contribution of centerline segregation of second-phase particles. Both the lab-processed sheets annealed at 400 °C for 90 min and the in-line annealed sheets exhibit tensile elongation of more than 20% and two-stage strain hardening behavior. Compared with the lab-processed sheets, the in-line annealed sheet annealed at 454 °C has higher values of UTS and elongation. Furthermore, forming limit curves were determined. It is found that the level of the forming limit curve of the lab-processed thin sheet is lower than that of conventionally produced 5052-O Al, but close to that of 6111-T4 Al sheet. Moreover, the in-line annealed sheets have higher limit strains than the lab-processed sheets. These results demonstrate that the in-line annealing process results in the production of continuous cast alloy sheet with improved formability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu J, Morries JG (2004) Mater Sci Eng A385:342

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Slámová M, Karlík M, Robaut F, Robaut F, Sláma P, Véron M (2002) Mater Characterization 49(3):231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haga T, Nishiyama T, Suzuki S (2003) J Mater Process Technol 133(1–2):103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou SX, Zhong J, Mao D, Funke P (2003) J Mater Process Technol 134(3):363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hecker SS (1975) Sheet Met Ind 52:671

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghosh AK (1978) In: Koistinen DP and Wang NM (eds) Mechanica of sheet metal forming. Plenum Press, New York, pp 287–312

  7. Moshksar MM, Mansorzadeh S (2003) J Mater Process Technol 141(1):138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hosford WF, Caddell RM (1993) Metal forming: mechanics and metallurgy, 2nd edn. PTR Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

  9. Yao H, Cao J (2002) Int J Plasticity 18(8):1013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stoughton TB (2000) Int J Mech Sci 42:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Samuel M (2004) J Mater Process Technol 153–154(10):424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aluminum Standards and data (1993) The Aluminum Association, Inc

  13. Hecker SS (1974) Mater Eng Q 11:30

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ghosh AK (1977) J Eng Mater Technol 7:264

    Google Scholar 

  15. Honeycomb RWK (1968) The plastic deformation of metals. Edward Arnold Publishers, pp 228

  16. Hecker SS (1975) J Eng Mater Technol 1:66

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ragab AR, Saleh ChAR (2000) Mech Mater 32:71

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanliang Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhu, H., Ghosh, A.K. & Maruyama, K. Formability of continuous cast 5052 alloy thin sheets. J Mater Sci 42, 588–594 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0832-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0832-y

Keywords

Navigation