Abstract
Grain boundary character distributions and triple junction distributions have been determined for 70 experimental microstructures, comprising aluminum-, copper-, austenitic iron- and nickel-based alloys in a wide variety of processed states. In these FCC metals, the fraction of coincidence site lattice (CSL) boundaries ranges from about 12% (as for a random Mackenzie distribution) to values as high as 75%. Despite wide variations in composition, processing, and grain size, we find that the grain boundary character distribution and triple junction distributions of these materials have striking similarities, and can be described by just a few parameters. This universality arises due to the highly non-random laws that govern the assembly of the grain boundary network, and due to the kinematic limitation that CSL boundaries arise primarily through twinning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. J. Schwartz, M. Kumar and B. L. Adams (Eds.), “Electron Backscatter Diffraction in Materials Science” (Kluwer Academic, New York, 2000).
M. C. Demirel, A. P. Kuprat, D. C. George, G. K. Straub and A. D. Rollett, Inter. Sci. 10 (2002) 137.
A. Kazaryan, Y. Wang, S. A. Dregia and B. R. Patton, Acta Mater. 50 (2002) 2491.
L. J. Gibson and M. F. Ashby “Cellular Solids: Structure & Properties,” Second edition (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1997).
K. Miyazawa, Y. Iwasaki, K. Ito and Y. Ishida, Acta Cryst. A52 (1996) 787.
V. Y. Gertsman, Acta Cryst. A57 (2001) 649.
V. Y. Gertsman, Acta Cryst. A57 (2001) 369.
A. P. Sutton and R. W. Balluffi “Interfaces in Crystalline Materials” (Oxford Science Publication, 1995).
M. Frary and C. A. Schuh, Acta Mater. 51 (2003) 3731.
M. Kumar, W. E. King and A. J. Schwartz, Acta Mater. 48 (2000) 2081.
C. A. Schuh, M. Kumar and W. E. King, Acta Mater. 51 (2003) 687.
C. A. Schuh, M. Kumar and W. E. King, Zeitschrift für Metallkunde 94 (2003) 323.
D. G. Brandon, Acta Metall. 14 (1966) 1479.
M. Deschamps, F. Baribier and A. Marrouche, Acta Metall. 35 (1987) 101.
G. Palumbo and K. T. Aust in “Materials Interfaces,” edited by D. Wolf and S. Yip (Chapman and Hall, London, 1992) p. 190.
G. Palumbo, E. M. Lehockey and P. Lin, JOM 50 (1998) 40.
T. Watanabe, Res Mechanica 11 (1984) 47.
T. Watanabe, Mater. Sci. Eng. A176 (1994) 39.
E. M. Lehockey, G. Palumbo and P. Lin, Metall. Mater. Transac. 29A (1998) 3069.
D. Horton, C. B. Thomson and V. Randle, Mater. Sci. Eng. A203 (1995) 408.
M. Kumar, A. J. Schwartz and W. E. King, Acta Mater. 50 (2002) 2599.
R. L. Fullman and J. C. Fisher, J. Appl. Phys. 22 (1951) 1350.
V. Randle, Acta Mater. 47 (1999) 4187.
V. Y. Gertsman and K. Tangri, Acta Metallurgica et Materialia 43 (1995) 2317.
G. Palumbo, K. T. Aust, U. Erb, P. J. King, A. M. Brennenstuhl and P. C. Lichtenberger, Physica Status Solidi 131 (1992) 425.
V. Y. Gertsman and K. Tangri, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 10 (1991) 768.
V. Y. Gertsman, K. Tangri and R. Z. Valiev, Acta Metallurgica et Materialia 42 (1994) 1785.
P. Davies, V. Randle, G. Watkins and H. Davies, J. Mater. Sci. 37 (2002) 4203.
Y. Pan and B. L. Adams, Scripta Metallurgica et Materialia 30 (1994) 1055.
A. Morawiec, J. A. Szpunar and D. C. Hinz, Acta Metallurgica et Materialia 41 (1993) 2825.
M. Frary and C. A. Schuh, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 (2003) 3755.
R. W. Minich, C. A. Schuh and M. Kumar, Phys. Rev. B 66 (2002) 052101.
C. A. Schuh, R. W. Minich and M. Kumar, Philosoph. Mag. A83 (2003) 711.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schuh, C.A., Kumar, M. & King, W.E. Universal features of grain boundary networks in FCC materials. J Mater Sci 40, 847–852 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-6500-9
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-6500-9