Abstract
In this paper, consistency is understood as absolute consistency (i.e. non-triviality). The basic constructive logic BKc6, which is adequate to this sense of consistency in the ternary relational semantics without a set of designated points, is defined. Then, it is shown how to define a series of logics by extending BKc6 up to contractionless intuitionistic logic. All logics defined in this paper are paraconsistent logics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Robles G. (2008) The basic constructive logic for negation-consistency. Journal of Logic Language and Information 17(2): 161–181
Robles, G., & Méndez, J. M. (2008a). On defining constructive negation in logics of entailment. In J. L. Béziau (Ed.), Papers in logics UNILOG 2005 (forthcoming).
Robles G., Méndez J. M. (2008b) The basic constructive logic for a weak sense of consistency. Journal of Logic Language and Information 17(1): 89–107
Robles, G., & Méndez, J. M. (in preparation). Strong paraconsistency and the basic constructive logic for an even weaker sense of consistency.
Robles, G. and Méndez (2008b) Relevance logics, paradoxes of consistency and the K rule. Logique et Analyse 198: 129–145 (An abstract of this paper was read at the Logic Colloquium 2006, Nijmegen, Holland, 27 July–2 August 2006)
Routley R. et al (1982) Relevant logics and their rivals (Vol. 1). Atascadero, CA, Ridgeview Publishing Co
Slaney, J. (1995). MaGIC, matrix generator for implication connectives: Version 2.1, notes and guide. Canberra: Australian National University, URL: http://users.rsise.anu.edu.au/~jks
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Méndez, J.M., Robles, G. The Basic Constructive Logic for Absolute Consistency. J of Log Lang and Inf 18, 199–216 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-008-9077-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-008-9077-2