Skip to main content
Log in

Mass customization design of engineer-to-order products using Benders’ decomposition and bi-level stochastic programming

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Leveraging product differentiation and mass production efficiency in mass customization basically entails a configure-to-order paradigm. In the engineer-to-order (ETO) business, however, companies build unique products in response to ‘foreseeable’ customer specifications. The key challenge of ETO mass customization lies in the complexity of accommodating future design changes when customers are involved in customizing design specifications. This paper proposes a two-stage, bi-level stochastic programming framework to tackle ETO mass customization. At the first stage, product platform configuration is integrated with production reconfiguration, which is formulated as a shortest path problem with resource constraints (SPPRC) to optimize production delays within the capabilities of the process platform. Benders’ decomposition algorithm is applied to solve this optimal configuration problem owing to its high computational efficiency. The second stage scrutinizes the optimal configuration resulting from the first stage for scaling optimization of design parameters (DPs) for each module. All DPs are differentiated by standard or customizable DPs. A bi-level stochastic program is implemented to leverage conflicting goals between the producer (leader) and consumer (follower) surpluses. As a result, ETO customization design is anchored with optimal values of standard DPs and optimal value ranges of customizable DPs. A case study of ship engine and power generator ETO design is presented, demonstrating the feasibility and potential of the ETO mass customization framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldonondo M., Vareilles E. (2008) Configuration for mass customization: How to extend product configuration towards requirements and process configuration. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 19(1): 521–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akundi, S., Simpson, T. W., & Reed, P. M. (2005). Multi-objective design optimization for product platform and product family design using genetic algorithms. ASME design engineering technical conferences, DETC2005/DAC-84905, Long Beach, CA.

  • Briere-Cote A., Rivest L., Desrochers A. (2010) Adaptive generic product structure modeling for design reuse in engineer-to-order products. Computers in Industry 61: 53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrosiers J., Soumis F., Desrochers M. (1984) Routing with time windows by column generation. Networks 14: 545–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faneyte D. B. C., Spieksma F. C. R., Woeginger G. J. (2002) A branch-and-price algorithm for a hierarchical crew scheduling problem. Naval Research Logistics (NRL) 49(8): 743–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, K., Sakaguchi, H., & Akagi, S. (1999). Product variety deployment and its optimization under modular architecture and module communalization. ASME design engineering technical conferences DETC99/DFM-8923, Las Vegas, NV.

  • Gumus Z. H., Floudas C. A. (2001) Global optimization of nonlinear bi-level programming problems. Journal of Global Optimization 20: 1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekaran A. (1998) Agile manufacturing: Enablers and an implementation framework. International Journal of Production Research 36(5): 1223–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao J. R., Tseng M., Ma Q., Zhou Y. (2000) Generic bill-of-materials-and-operations for high-variety production management. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications 8(4): 297–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao J., Simpson T. W., Siddique Z. (2007) Product family design and platform-based product development: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 18(1): 5–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao J. R., Zhang L. L., Pokharel S. (2007) Process platform planning for variety coordination from design to production in mass customization manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 54(1): 112–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalaf R. E. H., Agard B., Penz B. (2010) An experimental study for the selection of modules and facilities in a mass customization context. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 2(1): 703–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khrisnapillai R., Zeid A. (2006) Mapping product design specification for mass customization. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 17(1): 29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight M. P., Kim S. H. (1991) A knowledge system for integrated product design. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 2(1): 17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koren Y., Heisel U., Jovane F., Moriwaki T., Pritschow G., Ulsoy G., Van Brussel H. (1999) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Annals of CIRP 48(2): 527–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabi M. B., Ulsoy A. B., Koren Y. (2000) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: Key to future manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 11(1): 403–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercier A., Cordeau J. F., Soumis F. (2005) A computational study of Benders’ decomposition for the integrated aircraft routing and crew scheduling problem. Computers and Operations Research 32: 1451–1476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pine B. J. (1993) Mass customization: The new frontier in business competition. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Saharidis G. K. D., Minoux M., Ierapetritou M. G. (2010) Accelerating Bender’s method using covering cut bundle generation. International Transactions in Operational Research 17: 221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson T. W., Meier J. R. A., Mistree F. (2001) Product platform design: Research and application. Research in Engineering Design 13: 2–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson T. W. (2004) Product platform design and customization: Status and promise. AIEDAM 18(1): 3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stojkovic M., Soumis F. (2001) An optimization model for the simultaneous operational flight and pilot scheduling problem. Management Science 47(9): 1290–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatsiopoulos I. P. (1996) On the unification of bills of materials and routings. Computers in Industry 31: 293–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich K. (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy 24(3): 419–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yohanes Kristianto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kristianto, Y., Helo, P. & Jiao, R.J. Mass customization design of engineer-to-order products using Benders’ decomposition and bi-level stochastic programming. J Intell Manuf 24, 961–975 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-012-0692-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-012-0692-z

Keywords

Navigation