Skip to main content
Log in

An integrative supplier selection model using Taguchi loss function, TOPSIS and multi criteria goal programming

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some of the key factors affecting the selection of supplier are price, quality, delivery, satisfaction, and warranty degree. The present paper is an extension of previous related work to select the appropriate supplier. This paper deals with an integrative approach considering Taguchi’s loss function, Technique for Order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and Multi criteria goal programming. The model is split up into three phases. In the first phase, the quality losses are identified using Taguchi’s loss function. In the second phase, suitable factors are identified with different weights from TOPSIS and in the third phase, a goal programming model is developed to identify the best performing supplier with the weights and the loss associates. The purpose of this paper is to integrate different criteria levels to select relatively better performing supplier. A case is also presented and finally a comparison with data envelopment analysis (DEA) is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Faraj T. N., Alidi A. S., Al-Zayer J. A. (1993) Vendors selection via a spreadsheet analytical hierarchy process. Computers and Industrial Engineering 25(1-4): 65–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aouni B., Kettani O. (2001) Goal programming model: A glorious history and a promising future. European Journal of Operational Research 133(2): 225–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athawale, V. M., & Chakraborty, S. (2010). A TOPSIS method based approach to Machine tool selection. In International conference on Industrial engineering and operations management, Dhaka.

  • Banker R. D, Charnes A., Cooper W. W. (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science 30(9): 1078–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty T., Ghosh T., Dan P. K. (2011) Application of analytical hierarchy process and heuristic algorithm in solving vendor selection problem. Business Intelligence Journal 4(1): 167–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan F. T. S., Kumar N., Tiwari M. K., Lau H. C. W., Choy K. L. (2008) Global supplier selection: A fuzzy-AHP approach. International Journal of Production Research 46(14): 3825–3857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang C. T. (2007) Multi choice goal programming. Omega The international journal of management science 35(4): 389–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang C. (2008) Revised multi choice goal programming. Applied mathematical modelling volume 32(12): 2587–2595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A., Cooper W., Rhodes E. (1978) Measuring the efficiency of the decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2(6): 429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W. (1961) Management models and industrial application of linear programming. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S., Cheng, C.-H., & Lai, C.-J. (2011). Extracting performance rules of suppliers in the manufacturing industry: An empirical study. Joural of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-011-0530-8.

  • Dickson G. W. (1966) An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of purchasing 2(1): 5–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell M. J. (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, A 120(III): 253–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan Z., Jin Z., Zou B. (2007) A multi-objective mixed-integer stochastic programming model for the vendor selection problem under multi-product purchases. Information and Management sciences 18(3): 241–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha S. H., Krishnan R. (2008) A hybrid approach to supplier selection for the maintenance of a competitive supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications 34(2): 1303–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang C. L., Yoon K. (1981) Multiple attribute decision making method and applications. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ignizio J. P. (1976) Goal programming and extensions. Lexington books, Lexington, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, H.-Y., Lee, A. H. I., & Yang, C.-Y. (2010). A fuzzy ANP model for supplier selection as applied to IC packaging. Joural of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-010-0448-6.

  • Kasilingam R. G., Lee C. P. (1996) Selection of vendors—a mixed integer programming approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering 31(1/2): 347–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao C. N., Kao H.-P. (2010) Supplier selection model using Taguchi Loss function, analytical hierarchy process and multi choice goal programming. Computers & Industrial Engineering 58(4): 571–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao C. N. (2010) Supplier selection project using an integrated Delphi, AHP and Taguchi loss function. Probstat forum 3: 118–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao C. N. (2009) Formulating the multi segment goal programming. Computers and Industrial Engineering 56(1): 138–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J., Ding F. Y., Lall V. (2000) Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 5(3): 143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., Zhang, G., Ruan, D., & Wu, F. (2007). Multi-objective group decision making: methods, software and applications with fuzzy set techniques. ISBN-13 978-1-86094-793-3, ISBN-10 1-86094-793-X. Imperial College Press, London.

  • Ozaki, T., Lo, M.-C., Kinoshita, E., & Tzeng G.-H. (2011). Decision-making for the best selection of suppliers by using minor ANP. Joural of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-011-0563-z.

  • Pang, B., & Bai, S. (2011). An integrated fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for supplier selection based on analytic network process. Joural of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-011-0551-3.

  • Pi W., Low C. (2005) Supplier evaluation and selection using Taguchi loss functions. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 26(1-2): 155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan R. (2007) Supplier selection problem: Integrating DEA with the approaches of total cost of ownership and AHP. Supply Chain Management—An International Journal 12(4): 258–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero C. (2001) Extended lexicographic goal programming: A unifying approach. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science 29(1): 63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross P. J. (2005) Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering. Tata McGraw Hill Edition, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty T. L. (2008) Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making. Why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors. The Analytic hierarchy/network process. Statistics and Operations Research 102(2): 251–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty T. L. (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw Hill edition, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S. (2010) Policies concerning decisions related to quality level. International Journal of Production Economics 125(1): 146–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. (2012). Development of supplier relationship including cost of defectives in the cyclic production. Production Planning & Control: The Management of Operations. doi:10.1080/09537287.2012.666866.

  • Sharma S., Dubey D. (2010) Multiple sourcing decisions using integrated AHP and knapsack model: A case on carton sourcing. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 51(9-12): 1171–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi G., Elsayed A., Hsiang C. T. (1989) Quality Engineering in production systems. Mc Graw Hill Book company, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Talluri, S. (2000) Data envelopment analysis: Models and extensions. Decision Line, 8–11.

  • Tamiz M., Jones D., Romero C. (1998) Goal programming for decision making: An overview of the current state of the art. European Journal of Operational Research 111(3): 569–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai H. Y., Huang B. H., Wang A. S. (2008) Performance evaluation model of property-liability insurance companies in Taiwan-application of analysis network process. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences 29(6): 1045–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber C. A. (1996) A data envelopment analysis approach to measuring vendor performance. Supply Chain Management—An International Journal 1(1): 28–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjay Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, S., Balan, S. An integrative supplier selection model using Taguchi loss function, TOPSIS and multi criteria goal programming. J Intell Manuf 24, 1123–1130 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-012-0640-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-012-0640-y

Keywords

Navigation