Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A network-based assessment approach for change impacts on complex product

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The complex product design is a continuously changing process from customer requirements to a maturity design. During this process a change of one part will, in most cases, causes changes in other parts and even the whole product. The assessment for the impacts of such changes can support designers’ designing and help manager to manage redesigning. A complex product can be considered as a weighted network of parts, subassemblies, or subsystems. Based on the theory of weighted networks, three changeability indices (degree-changeability, reach-changeability and between-changeability) are presented. Degree-changeability is used to calculate the direct change impacts. Reach-changeability is used to assess the indirectly change impacts because of propagation. If a part influences the other parts dramatically and it is also influenced by them, this part can be predicted by between-changeability. Finally, the three changeability indices are proven to be effective for the change impact assessment through a real-world case of Roots Blowers. With the analysis, the designers can avoid changing to “expensive” parts or subsystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert R., Barabási A. L. (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics 74(1): 47–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bavelas A. (1948) A mathematical model for group structures.  Human Organization 7: 16–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Boccaletti S., Latora V., Moreno Y., Chavez M., Hwang D. U. (2006) Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Physics Reports 424(4–5): 175–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark K. B., Fujimoto T. (1991) Product development performance: Strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson P. J., Simons C., Eckert C. (2004) Predicting change propagation in complex design. Journal of Mechanical Design 126(9): 788–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen T., Navthe S., Fulton R. E. (2000) C-FAR, change favorable representation. Computer Aided Design 32(5): 321–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doreian P. (1974) On the connectivity of social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 3: 245–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C. M., Zanker, W. & Clarkson, P. J. (2001). Aspects of a better understanding of changes. In Proceedings of international conference on engineering design (ICED’01) (pp. 147–154). Glasgow, UK, 21–23 August.

  • Eckert C. M., Clarkson P. J., Zanker W. (2004) Change and customization in complex engineering domains. Research in Engineering Design 15(1): 1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert C. M., Keller R., Earl C., Clarkson P. J. (2006) Supporting change processes in design: Complexity, prediction and reliability. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 91(12): 1521–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, T. L., Eckert, C. M., Smith, J., Eger, T., & Clarkson, P. J. (2003). A functional analysis of change propagation. In Proceedings of international conference on engineering design (ICED’03) (pp. 441–442). Stockholm, Sweden, 19–21 August.

  • Freeman L. C. (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40(1): 35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman L. C. (1979) Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1(3): 215–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giffin, M. L. (2007). Change propagation in large technical systems, Master Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Jarratt, T., Clarkson, P. J., Parks, G. & Eckert, C. M. (2002). Use of Monte Carlo methods in the prediction of change propagation. In Computer-based design: Engineering design conference 2002(EDC’02) (pp. 487–498). London, UK, 9–11 July.

  • Keller, R., Eckert, C. M. & Clarkson, P. J. (2005). Multiple views to support engineering change management for complex products. In Proceedings of the third international conference on coordinated & multiple views in exploratory visualization (CMV’05) (pp. 33–41). London, UK, 5 July.

  • Keller, R., et al. (2007). Product models in design: A combined use of two models to assess change risks. In 16th international conference on engineering design (ICED’07) (pp. 673–674). Paris, France, 28–31 August.

  • Krishnapillai R., Zeid A. (2006) Mapping product design specification for mass customisation. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 17(1): 29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latora V., Marchiori M. (2005) Vulnerability and protection of infrastructure networks. Physical Review E 71(1): 015103(4)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H. et al (2010) An analytic network process approach to measuring design change impacts in modular products. Journal of Engineering Design 21(1): 75–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin M. V., Ishii K. (2002) Design for variety: Developing standardized and modularized product platform architectures. Research in Engineering Design 13(4): 213–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkola J. H., Gassmann O. (2003) Managing modularity of product architectures toward an integrated theory. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 50(5): 204–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman M. E. J. (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 45(3): 167–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ollinger, G. A. & Stahovich, T. F. (2001). RedesignIT-A constraint-based tool for managing design changes. In Proceedings of DETC ‘01 ASME 2001 design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. Pittsburgh, USA, 9–12 (September), Paper No. DETC2001/DTM-21702.

  • Pimmler, T. U. & Eppinger, S. D. (1994). Integration analysis of product decompositions. In Proceedings of the ASME design theory and methodology conference (DTM’94) (pp. 343–351). Minneapolis, USA, September.

  • Reagans R., McEvily B. (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly 48(2): 240–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon H. (1996) The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). MIT Press, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw M. E. (1954) Group structure and the behavior of individuals in small groups. Journal of Psychology 38: 139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strogatz S. H. (2001) Exploring complex networks. Nature 410(3): 268–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh N. P. (1990) The principles of design. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh E. S., de Weck O., Kim I., Chang D. (2007) Flexible platform component design under uncertainty. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 18(1): 115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich K., Tung K. (1991) Fundamentals of product modularity. Fundamentals of product modularity. Proceedings of the 1991 ASME winter annual meeting symposium on issues in design/manufacturing integration 39(12): 73–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich K. (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy 24(3): 419–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanWie M., Stone R. B., Thevenot H., Simpson T. (2007) Examination of platform and differentiating elements in product family Design. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 18(1): 77–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

    Hui Cheng & Xuening Chu

Authors
  1. Hui Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xuening Chu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuening Chu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, H., Chu, X. A network-based assessment approach for change impacts on complex product. J Intell Manuf 23, 1419–1431 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-010-0454-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-010-0454-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation