Skip to main content
Log in

An intelligent simulation model of online consumer behavior

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the design of an Intelligent Simulation Model of Online Consumer Behavior (ISMOCB) that incorporates a knowledge base using some form of the Artificial Intelligence methods such as Naïve Bayes Classifier and Artificial Neural Networks. This study investigates modeling online consumer behavior by using demographic characteristics such as age, gender, marital status, educational status, monthly income and number of people in the family. This will provide producing more synthetic data and creating an “Artificial Database” which includes the demographics of online consumers and their purchase transactions. The model is built for online shopping based on empirical data gathered in Turkey via an online survey. Two different inference systems are used for which product group is chosen by whom has which demographic characteristics. The quality of the data, gathered exclusively for this project, allows a fine validation of the simulation results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrod R. (1997) The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of cooperation and collaboration. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellenger, D. N., & Korgaonkar, P. K. (1980). Profiling the recreational shopper. Journal of Retailing, 56, Fall, 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cagil, G., Erdem, M. B., & Topal, B. (2008). Analysis of purchasing behavior of online consumers. YA/EM 2008.

  • Chick S. E. (2006) Six ways to improve a simulation analysis. Journal of Simulation 1: 21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cybenko G. (1989) Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems 2: 303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darian J. C. (1987) In-home shopping: Are there consumer segments? Journal of Retailing 63(2): 163–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Donthu N., Garcia A. (1999) The internet shopper. Journal of Advertising Research 39(3): 52–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Duda P. O., Hart P. E. (1973) Pattern classification and scene analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher E., Arnold S. J. (1990) More than a labor of love: Gender roles and christmas shopping. Journal of Consumer Research 17(December): 333–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilly M. C., Enis B. M. (1982) Recycling the family life cycle: A proposal for redefinition. In: Mitchell A. A. (eds) Advances in consumer research. Association for Consumer Research, 9 Ann Arbor, MI, pp 271–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Greasley, A. (2005). Using DEA and simulation in guiding operating units to improved performance.

  • Hoffman D. L., Kalsbeek W. D., Novak T. P. (1996) Internet and web use in the United States: Baselines for commercial development. Special Section on “Internet in the Home,” Communications of the ACM 39(December): 36–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornik K. (1991) Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward Networks. Neural Networks 4: 251–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M. (2007). A study on the qualitative simulation of consumer behavior under the environment of electronic commerce. ISKE-2007 Proceedings, Advances in Intelligent Systems Research.

  • May E. G., Greyser S. A. (1989) From-home shopping: Where is it leading? In: Pellegrini L., Reddy S. K. (eds) Retail and marketing channels—Economic and marketing perspectives on producer-distributor relationships. Routledge, London, pp 216–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard M. D., Lippmann R. (1991) Neural network classifiers estimate Bayesian a posteriori probabilities. Neural Computing 3: 461–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson S. (2004) Simulation: The practice of model development and use. Wiley, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaninger C. M., Danko W. D. (1993) A conceptual and empirical comparison of alternative household life cycle models. Journal of Consumer Research 19(March): 580–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman L. G., Kanuk L. L. (1997) Consumer behavior (6th ed.). Prentice Hall, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaiger, A., & Stahmer, B. (2003). SimMarket: Multi-agent based customer simulation and decision support for category management. In M. Shillo et al. (Eds.), Applying agents for engineering of industrial automation systems, LNAI 2831. Berlin: Springer.

  • Siebers, P., Aickelin, U., Celia, H., & Clegg, C. (2009). Simulating customer experience and word-of-mouth in, retail—A case study. Simulation: Transactions of the Society for Modeling and Simulation International.

  • Solomon M. (1999) Consumer behavior (4th ed.). Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Statsoft. (2008). Text book: http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/stnaiveb.html. Accessed 11 December 2008.

  • Thompson, C. J. (1996). Caring consumers: Gendered consumption meanings and the juggling lifestyle. Journal of Consumer Research.

  • Wallace, P. (2000). Forget kids—Women rule on the web.

  • Xue-wu, S., Gui-hua, N., & Ling, S. (2006). Gender-based differences in the effect of web advertising in e-business. International Conference on Management Science and Engineering, 78–83.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Bilgehan Erdem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Çağil, G., Erdem, M.B. An intelligent simulation model of online consumer behavior. J Intell Manuf 23, 1015–1022 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-010-0439-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-010-0439-7

Keywords

Navigation