Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effects of target location and target distinction on visual search in a depth display

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research of human-centered computing systems in industry should not avoid advances in visual display technology for safety, warning, and interaction. Novel 3D displays that present information in real depth offer potential benefits. Previous research has studied depth in visual search but depth was mostly not realized by real physical separation. Many areas of Human Factors could be augmented with the study and evaluation for operation of novel 3D displays. Such a study was presented to better understand the effects of real physical depth in association with depth redundantly coded with another feature (an additional mark on a target) distinguishing it from distracters and target location on visual search in a depth display. Target location was studied as the row or column in the visual field of view the target was positioned and also in terms of eccentricity outwardly from the center of the display. In general, depth was found to be of benefit when redundantly coded with another attribute for guiding attention. Targets were not found as fast when the target’s location was further from the center fixation point, and interactions between target distinction (depth, mark, or depth+mark) and target location provide implications for designers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson G. J. (1990) Focused attention in three-dimensional space. Perception & Psychophysics 47: 112–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson G. J., Kramer A. F. (1998) Limits of focused attention in three-dimensional space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24: 1476–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield J. (1972) Visual Search in complex fields: Size differences between target disc and surrounding discs. Human Factor 14: 139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell G. B., Schwartz A. J. (2006) Creative 3-D display and interaction interfaces. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolia, R. S., Nelson, W. T., Gardner, C. M., Vidulich, M. A., & McLaughlin, A. B. (2003). A visual depth display for air battle managers: Effects of depth and transparency on performance and workload. Setting the standards. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Australian Aviation Psychology Symposium. Format: CDROM.

  • Bolia R. S., Nelson W. T., Middendorf M. S., Guilliams N. M. (2004) Evaluating the utility of a multi-layered visual display for air battle managers. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings 48: 21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman D., Kruijff E., Laviolla J.J. Jr., Poupyrev I. (2004) 3D user interfaces: Theory and practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Captain, S. (2009). 3-D TV that actually works. In Wired. 22 August 2006. Retrieved 8 March 2009. http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/08/71627.

  • Cardinal R.N., Aitken M.R. (2005) ANOVA for the behavioral sciences researcher. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco M., Chang I. (1995) The interaction of objective and subjective organizations in a localization task. Perception and Psychophyscis 10: 113–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco M., Evert D. L., Chang I., Katz S. M. (1995) The eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches. Perception & Psychophysics 57: 1241–1261

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J., Cohen P., West S. G., Aiken L. S. (2003) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Company Profile. (2009). IGT. In Reuters. 8 March 2009. Retrieved 8 March 2009. http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/companyProfile?symbol=IGT.W&rpc=66.

  • Drascic D., Migram P. (1996) Perceptual issues in augmented reality. Proceedings of SPIE, Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems III 2653: 123–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Drury C., Clement M. (1978) The effect of area, density, and number of background characters on visual search. Human Factors 20: 597–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan J., Humphreys G. W. (1989) Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review 96: 433–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron R., Yund E. W. (1996) Spatial nonuniformities in visual search. Brain and Cognition 31: 331–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enoch J. M. (1959) Effects of the size of a complex display upon visual search. Journal of the Optical Society of America 49: 280–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson R. A. (1964) Relation between visual search time and peripheral visual acuity. Human Factors 6: 165–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Havig, P. Aleva, D., Reis, G., Moore, J., and McIntire, J. (2007). Metrics for 3D displays. In J. T. Thomas & A. Malloy (Eds.), Display technologies and applications for defense, security, and avionics (Vol. 6558, pp. 65580J). Proceedings of the SPIE.

  • Howard I. P., Rogers B. J. (1995) Binocular vision and stereopsis. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk E. (1995) Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co, Pacific Grove, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Krendal E. S., Wodinsky J. (1960) Search in an unstructured visual field. Journal of the Optical Society of America 50: 562–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limpert E., Stahel W., Abbt M. (2001) Log-normal distributions across the sciences: Keys and clues. BioScience 51(5): 341–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancero G., Wong W. (2005) An evaluation of perceptual depth to enhance change detection. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings 52: 338–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Max L., Onghena P. (1999) Some issues in the statistical analysis of completely randomized and repeated measures designs for speech, language, and hearing research. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42: 261–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Medical holograms give doctors cutting-edge view. In MyFoxChicago. Retrieved 8 March 2009. http://www.myfoxchicago.com/dpp/health/medical_holograms.

  • Monk T., Brown B. (1975) The effect of target surround density on visual search performance. Human Factors 17: 356–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Monnier P. (2006) Detection of multidimensional targets in visual search. Vision Research 46: 4083–4090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mon-Williams M., Wann J. P., Rushton S. (1993) Binocular vision in a virtual world: Visual deficits following the wearing of a head-mounted display. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 13: 387–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakayama K., Silverman G. H. (1986) Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature 320: 264–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogle K. N. (1950) Researches in binocular vision. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole A. J., Walker C. L. (2008) On the preattentive accessibility of stereoscopic disparity: Evidence from visual search. Perception and Psychophysics 59(2): 202–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Previc F. H., Blume J. L. (1993) Visual search asymmetries in three-dimensional space. Vision Research 33(18): 2697–2704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PureDepth. (2009). Retrieved 8 March, 2009. http://www.puredepth.com/.

  • Rawlings S. C., Shipley T. (1959) Stereoscopic acuity and horizontal angular distance from fixation. Journal of the Optical Society of America 59: 991–993

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, M. (2009). 3D is coming to a living room near you. CNN.com/technology. CNN. 15 January 2009. Retrieved 8 March 2009. http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/01/15/3d.tv/index.html.

  • Salvendy, G. (Ed.). (2006). Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick H. A. (1986) Space perception. In: Boff K. R., Kaufman L., Thomas J. P. (eds) Handbook of perception and human performance vol. 1. Wiley, New York, pp 2-11–21-57

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman A., Gelade G. (1980) A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12: 97–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman A., Souther J. (1985) Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. Journal Experimental Psychology: General 114(3): 285–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wann J. P., Rushton S., Mon-Williams M. (1995) Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments. Vision Research 35(19): 2731–2736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesler, M., Lucas, J., Gallimore, J.J., & Marshak, W.P. (1999). Managing uninhabited ariel vehicle (UAV) employing a reduced area/depth separated display. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, Aerospace Systems, 43, 91–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams L. G. (1966) The effect of target specification on objects fixed during visual search. Perception & Psychophysics 1: 315–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe J. M. (2007) Guided search 4.0. current progress with a model of visual search. In: Gray W. D. (eds) Integrated models of cognitive systems. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 99–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe J. M., Horowitz T. S. (2004) What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?. Nature Reviews, Neuroscience 5: 495–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe J. M., O’Neil P., Bennett S. C. (1998) Why are there eccentricity effects in visual search? Visual and attentional hypotheses. Perception & Psychophysics 60(1): 140–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong B. L. W., Joyekurun R., Nees A., Amaldi P., Villanueva R. (2005) Information layering, depth and transparency effects on multi-layered displays for command and control. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings 49: 352–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonas A., Pittenger J. (1973) Searching for many targets: An analysis f speed and accuracy. Perception & Psychophysics 13: 513–516

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 711 HPW/RHCV/Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, 2255 H Street, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, 45433-7022, USA

    George Reis, Paul Havig & Eric Heft

  2. Department of Biomedical, Industrial and Human Factors Engineering, Wright State University, 3640 Colonel Glenn Highway, Dayton, OH, 45435, USA

    Yan Liu

Authors
  1. George Reis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul Havig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eric Heft
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Reis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reis, G., Liu, Y., Havig, P. et al. The effects of target location and target distinction on visual search in a depth display. J Intell Manuf 22, 29–41 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-009-0280-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-009-0280-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation