Skip to main content
Log in

A conceptual model of value systems in collaborative networks

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decision making and thus the individual and joint behavior in a collaborative network depend on the underlying Value Systemadopted by the network members. Therefore the identification and characterization of the Value System of the network and its members is fundamental when attempting to improve the collaborative process. However the concept of Value System is not properly defined yet and there is not even an agreement in research community about its intuitive definition. Departing from a definition of value and evaluation, this paper proposes a formal conceptual model for Value Systems and discusses its application in the management of collaborative networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afsarmanesh, H., & Camarinha-Matos, L. M. (2005). A framework for management of virtual organization breeding environments. In Collaborative networks and their breeding environments (IFIP Series, Vol. 186/2005, pp. 35–48). Springer.

  • Alle V. (2000) Reconfiguring the value network. The Journal of Business Strategy 21(4): 36–39. doi:10.1108/eb040103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antunes, L., Coelho, H., & Faria, J. (2000). Improving choice mechanisms within the BVG architecture. Agent theories, architectures, and languages—ICMAS 2000. Springer-Verlag.

  • Camarinha-Matos, L. M., & Macedo, P. (2007). Towards a conceptual model of value systems in collaborative networks. In Proceedings of PRO-VE’07—Establishing the Foundation of Collaborative Networks, 10–12 Sep 2007, Guimarães, Portugal, pp. 53–64.

  • Cooley C.R. (1977) Cultural effects in Indian education: An application of social learning theory. Journal of American Indian Education 17(1): 21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipe, J. (2003). The organisational semiotics normative paradigm. In L. M. Camarinha-Matos & H. Afsarmanesh (Eds.), Collaborative networked organizations (pp. 261–272). Springer.

  • Goguen, J. (1994). Requirements engineering as the reconciliation of technical and social issues. Requirements engineering: Social and technical issues (pp. 162–199). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Professional, Inc.

  • Goguen, J. (2003). Semiotics, compassion and value-centered design. Keynote lecture In Proceedings of the Organizational Semiotics Workshop. University of Reading, UK.

  • Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H., & Vilet, H. v. (2000). Value based requirements creation for electronic commerce applications. In Proceedings of the 33rd HICSS Hawaii, USA.

  • Homans G.C. (1958) Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology 63: 597–606. doi:10.1086/222355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, M., Thorpe, A., & Tyler, A. (1996). Refocusing collaboration technologies in the construction value system. In Proceedings of the CIB W78 Conference Construction on the Information Superhighway, Slovenia, April, pp. 279-289.

  • Kartseva, V., Gordijn, J., & Akkermans, H. (2004). A design perspective on networked business models: A study of distributed generation in the power industry sector. 12th European Conference on Information Systems.

  • Katzy B. (1998) Value system redesign. ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin archive 19(3): 48–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosko B. (1997) Fuzzy engineering. New Jersey, Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan V.R. (2005) Leader-member exchange, transformational leadership, and value system. EJBO Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies 10(1): 14–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, P.-Y. & Hsieh, Y.-C. (2005). A study based on the value system for the interaction of the multi-tiered supply chain under the trend of e-business. The 7th international conference on Electronic Commerce, Xian, China.

  • Mefford, D., & Meffortd, V. (1997). Values Usage Exercise (VUE) a tool for raising values awareness concerning the professional— Personal values interface. Conference on Professional Ethics. Washington.

  • Piaget J. (1965) Essay sur la Th’eorie des Valeurs Qualitatifs en Sociologie Statique. Librairie Droz, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezgui, Y., Wilson, I., Olphert, W., & Damodaran, L. (2004). Socio-organizational issues. Collaborative networked organizations (pp. 187–198). Springer.

  • Rodrigues, M. R., & Luck, M. (2005). Analysing partner selection through exchange values. In Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 3891/2006, pp. 24–40). Springer.

  • Rokeach M. (1973) The nature of human values. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, D., Galeano, N., & Molina, A. (2007). A conceptual model for virtual breeding environments value systems. In Establishing the foundation of collaborative networks (IFIP Series, Vol. 243/2007, pp. 43–52). Springer.

  • Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective user interface interaction. Addison Wesley Longman.

  • Tan, Y., Thoen, W., & Gordijn, J. (2004). Modeling controls for dynamic value exchanges in virtual organizations. In Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 2995/2004, pp. 236–250). Springer.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis M. Camarinha-Matos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Macedo, P. A conceptual model of value systems in collaborative networks. J Intell Manuf 21, 287–299 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-008-0180-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-008-0180-7

Keywords

Navigation