Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A distributed architecture for reconfigurable control of continuous process operations

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers a new distributed approach to reconfigurable control of continuous process operations such as in chemical plants. The research is set on a premise that emerging business pressures of product customization and industrial globalization will lead to increased need for reconfigurability in process plants. The ability of processes to support dynamic and smooth reorganization of process schemes in tandem with the changing requirements of supply chains will become important in future. Conventional control approaches based on hierarchical architectures are limited in dealing with such emerging requirements due to their inflexible structures and operating rules. Instead, more distributed approaches are required which can support increased level of reconfigurability in control systems, especially at the lower levels in hierarchy where the visibility to disturbances remains high. In this paper, one such distributed approach is considered based on the concepts of holonic manufacturing and supply chain management. The proposed approach distributes the functionality of process control into several reconfigurable process elements. These elements, while having a stand-alone capability for making their own control decisions, are also able to reconfigure themselves into alternative process schemes which evolve with the changing requirements of production. An analogy between process plants and so-called dynamic supply networks or virtual enterprises is used in this paper to define the composition of reconfigurable process elements and their operations. The proposed approach is shown to offer improved process control system reconfigurability and a control architecture which is compatible with the supply chain management needs at the next higher level. The purpose of this paper is qualitative and motivational. It is aimed to propose a new research direction in the field of reconfigurable process control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANSI/ISA (1995). Batch control, Part 1: Models and terminology. International Standard ANSI/ISA-S88.01. North Carolina, USA: The Instrumentation Systems and Automation Society.

  • Babiceanu R.F., Chen F.F. (2006). Development and applications of holonic manufacturing systems: A survey. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 17, 111–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backx, T., Bosgra, O., & Marquardt, W. (2000). Towards intentional dynamics in supply chain conscious process operations. Technical report, CAPE-NET, http://cape-alliance.ucl.org.uk.

  • Batres R., Soutter J., Asprey S., Chung P. (2002). Operating procedure synthesis: Science or art. The Knowledge Engineering Review 17(3): 261–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biegler, L. Grossmann, I., & Westerberg, A. (1997). Systematic methods of chemical process design. Physical and Chemical Engineering Series, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall International Series.

  • Bogle, D. (1999). State of the art of research in flexibility, operability and dynamics. Discussion paper. TWG3/ D Bogle/R&D SoA Review/Rev P/1998-01-12. CAPE.NET. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/bogle98state.html.

  • Bolton, L., & Perris, T. (1999). A vision of future industrial needs and capabilities: Process modelling, simulation and control. Technical report, CAPRI Project.

  • Bongaerts L., Monostori L., McFarlane D., Kadar (2000). Hierarchy in distributed shop floor control. Computers in Industry, 43: 123–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan R., Fletcher M., Norrie D. (2002). An agent-based approach to reconfiguration of real-time distributed control systems. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 18(4): 444–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camarinha-Matos L., Afsarmanesh H., Rabelo R. (2003). Infrastructure developments for agile virtual enterprises. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 16(4–5):235–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung H.M.E., Yeung W.H.R., Ng H.C.A., Fung S.T.R. (2000). HSCF: A holonic shopfloor control framework for flexible manufacturing systems. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 13(2): 121–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chirn J.L., McFarlane D.C. (2001). Building holonic systems in today’s factories: A migration strategy. Journal of Applied Systems Studies, 2(1): 82–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Chokshi, N. (2005). Holonic process control: A distributed, collaborative approach to the control of chemical process operations. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, UK: Institute for Manufacturing.

  • Chokshi, N., & McFarlane, D. C. (2002). Rationales for holonic applications in chemical industries. In Proceedings of HoloMAS 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2322 (pp. 336–350). London: Springer-Verlag.

  • Chokshi, N., & McFarlane, D. C. (2006). A distributed coordination approach to reconfigurable process control, In Preparation, Submission to IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

  • Colombo A.W., Schoop R., Neubert R. (2006). An agent-based intelligent control platform for industrial holonic manufacturing systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 53(1): 322–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilts D.M., Boyd N.P., Whorms H.H. (1991). The evolution of control architectures for automated manufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 10(1):79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doesburg, H. V., Rees, R., & Simons, T. (1999). The changing structure of the global chemical industry. Technical report, Andersen Consulting, London.

  • Force, O. T. (1998). OPC overview. Industry standard specification Ver 1.0, http://www.opcfoundation.org.

  • Fox M., Barbuceanu M., Teigen R. (2000). Agent-oriented supply-chain management. The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 12: 165–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gou L., Luh P., Kyoya Y. (1998). Holonic manufacturing scheduling: Architecture, cooperation, mechanism, and imple-mentation. Computers in Industry 37: 213–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann I. (2004). Challenges in the new millennium, product discovery and design, enterprise and supply chain optimization, global life cycle assessment. Computers and Chemical Engineering 29, 29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann I., Floudas C. (1987). Active constraint strategy for flexibility analysis in chemical processes. Computers and Chemical Engineering 11(6): 675–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, A. (2001). Private communication. Reading, UK: Foster-Wheeler Corp.

  • Ierapetritou M., Floudas C. (1998). Effective continuous-time formulation for short-term scheduling Parts Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 37, 4341–4374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller G.E., Bryan P.F. (2000). Process engineering: Moving in new directions. Chemical Engineering Progress 96(1): 41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Koolen, J. (1998). Simple and robust design of chemical plants. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 22(Suppl.), S255–S262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitão P., Restivo F. (2006). ADACOR: A holonic architecture for agile and adaptive manufacturing Control. Computers in Industry 57, 121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, G., & Solberg, J. (1994). Autonomous control for open manufacturing systems. In S. B. Joshi & J. S. Smith (Eds.), Computer Control of Flexible Manufacturing Systems (pp. 169–206). Chapman & Hall.

  • Luyben W., Tyreus B.D., Luyben M.L. (1997). Plantwide process control. McGraw-Hill, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana F.P., Straton R.J., Hall K.H. (2005). Methodologies and tools for intelligent agents in distributed control. IEEE Intelligent Systems Magazine 20, 42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane D.C., Bussmann S. (2000). State of the art of holonic systems in production planning and control. Production Planning and Control 11(6): 522–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane D.C., Marik V. (2005). Industrial adoption of agent-based technologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems Magazine 20, 27–35

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, D. C. (1995). Holonic Manufacturing systems in continuous processing: Concepts and control requirements. In Proceedings of ASI’95, Portugal, June, 1995.

  • Papageorgiou, L., & Pantelides, C. (1996). Optimal campaign planning/scheduling of multipurpose batch/semicontinous plants. 1. Mathematical formulation 2. Mathematical decomposition. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 35, 488–529.

  • Seilonen, I., Pirttioja, T., Pakonen, A., Appelqvist, P., Halme, A., & Koskinen, K. (2005). Information access and control operations in multi-agent system based process automation. In Proceedings of HoloMAS 2005, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 3593 (pp. 144–153). Berlin: Sringer-Verlag.

  • Shah N. (2005). Process industry supply chains: Advances and challenges. Computers and Chemical Engineering 29, 1225–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen W., Wang L., Hao Q. (2006). Agent-based distributed manufacturing process planning and scheduling: A state-of-the-art survey. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part C: Applications and Reviews 36(4): 563–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith R.G. (1980). The contract net protocol: High-level communication and control in a distributed problem solver. IEEE Transactions on Computers C-29(12): 1104–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa P., Ramos C. (1999). A distributed architecture and negotiation protocol for scheduling in manufacturing systems. Computers in Industry 38, 103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strader T., Lin F.-R., Shaw M. (1998). Information infrastructure for electronic virtual organization management. Decision Support Systems 23, 75–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomesse J.-P. (2005). Fieldbus technology in industrial automation. Proceedings of the IEEE 93(6): 1073–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Brussel H. v., Wyns J., Valckenaers P., Bongaerts L., Peeters P. (1998). Reference architecture for holonic manufacturing systems: PROSA. Computers in Industry 37: 255–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. (1989). A Reference Model for Computer Integrated Manufacturing(CIM): A Description from the Viewpoint of Industrial Automation. North Carolina, USA: Instrumentation, Systems and Automation Society.

  • Zaremba M.B., Morel G. (2003). Integration and control of intelligence in distributed manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 14, 25–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, 16 Mill Lane, Cambridge, CB2 1RX, UK

    Nirav Chokshi & Duncan McFarlane

Authors
  1. Nirav Chokshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Duncan McFarlane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nirav Chokshi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chokshi, N., McFarlane, D. A distributed architecture for reconfigurable control of continuous process operations. J Intell Manuf 19, 215–232 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-008-0075-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-008-0075-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation