Skip to main content
Log in

Early and rapidly internationalizing ventures: Similarities and differences between classifications based on the original international new venture and born global literatures

  • Published:
Journal of International Entrepreneurship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The novel contribution of this article is that it compares classifications of early and rapidly internationalizing firms based on the original literature on International New Ventures (classification method based on speed and scope of internationalization) as well as the original literature on Born Globals (classification method based on speed and extent of internationalization). Evidence from a survey of almost 900 Danish manufacturers demonstrates that the two methods provide similar results with regard to overall patterns of internationalization, but that they classify individual firms quite differently. From a theoretical stance it is therefore recommended to incorporate a richer selection of indicators (aspects of speed, scope as well as extent) in order to secure higher comparability between studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Autio E, Sapienza HJ, Almeida JG (2000) Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal 43(5):909–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspelund A, Madsen TK, Moen Ø (2007) A review of the foundation, international marketing strategies, and performance of international new ventures. European Journal of Marketing 41(11/12):1423–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum M, Schwens C, Kabst R (2011) A typology of international new ventures: empirical evidence form high-tech industries. Journal of Small Business Management 49(3):305–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgel O, Murray GC (2000) The international market entry choices of start-up companies in high-technology industries. Journal of International Marketing 8(2):33–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesinger B, Fink M, Madsen TK, Kraus S (2012) Rapidly internationalizing ventures: how definitions can bridge the gap across contexts. Management Decision 50(10):1816–1842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello NE, Jones MV (2004) Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing 19:485–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick D, Chaudhry S, Batstone S (2001) An investigation into the overseas expansion of small asian-owned UK firms. Small Business Economics 16:75–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielsson M, Kirpalani VHM, Dimitratos P, Solberg CA, Zucchella A (2008) Conceptualizations to advance born global definition: a research note. Global Business Review 9(1):45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielsson P, Gabrielsson M (2004) Globalizing internationals: portfolio and marketing strategies in the ICT field. International Business Review 13:661–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harveston PD, Kedia BL, Davis PSA (2000) Internationalization of born global and gradual globalizing firms: the impact of the manager. Advances in Competitiveness Research 8:92–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (2009) The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: from liability of foreigness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies 40:1411–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson J, Vahlne JE (1977) The internationalization process of the firm—a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies 8:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly V, Alahuhta M, Jeanet J-P (1992) Challenging the incumbents: how high-technology start-ups compete globally. Journal of Strategic Change 1:71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keupp MM, Gassmann O (2009) The past and the future of international entrepreneurship: a review and suggestions for developing the field. Journal of Management 35:600–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G. (1997) ‘Emerging paradigm for international marketing: the born global firm’, unpublished dissertation, Department of Marketing and Supply Chain Management, Michigan State University

  • Knight G, Cavusgil ST (1996) The born global firm: a challenge to traditional internationalization theory. Advances in International Marketing 8:11–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuivalainen O, Saarenketo S, Puumalainen K (2012) Start-up patterns of internationalization: a framework and its application in the context of knowledge intensive SMEs. European Management Journal 30:372–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen TK, Knudsen T (2003) International new ventures: a new organizational form?. In Jim Bell, Trevor Morrow and Denise Crossan (eds) “Conference Proceedings: The Sixth McGill Conference on International Entrepreneurship: Crossing Boundaries and Researching New Futures”, University of Ulster, Magee Campus, No. 111

  • Madsen TK, Rasmussen E, Servais P (2000) Differences and similarities between born globals and other types of exporters. Advances in International Marketing 10:247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen TK, Servais P (1997) The internationalization of born globals: an evolutionary process. International Business Review 6(2):561–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews JA, Zander I (2007) The international entrepreneurial dynamics of accelerated internationalisation. Journal of International Business Studies 38:187–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall PP, Oviatt BM, Shrader RC (2003) A comparison of international and domestic new ventures. Journal of International Entrepreneurship 1:59–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall PP, Oviatt BM (2000) International entrepreneurship: the intersection of two research paths. Acad Manage J 43(5):902–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton R (2003) The number of export markets that a firm serves: process models versus the born-global phenomenon. Journal of International Entrepreneurship 1:297–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melén S, Nordman ER (2009) The internationalization modes of born globals: a longitudinal study. European Management Journal 27:243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen Ø (2002) The born globals: a new generation of small European exporters. International Marketing Review 19(2):156–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (2005) Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 29:537–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (1997) Challenges for internationalization process theory: the case of international new ventures. Management International Review 37(2):85–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (1994) Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies 25:45–64, First Quarter

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie MW (1993) Global competitiveness: born global. The McKinsey Quarterly 4(4):45–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Rialp A, Rialp J, Knight G (2005) The phenomenon of international new ventures, global start-ups, and born globals: what do we know after a decade (1993–2002) of exhaustive scientific inquiry. International Business Review 14:147–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romanelli E (1991) The evolution of new organizational forms. Annual Review of Sociology 17:79–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrader RC (2001) Collaboration and performance in foreign markets: the case of young high-technology manufacturing firms. Acad Manage J 44:45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwens C, Kabst R (2009) How early opposed to late internationalizers learn: experience of others and paradigms of interpretation. International Business Review 18:509–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson G (2006) A quest for a common terminology: the concept of born glocals. Management Decision 44:1311–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson G, Payan JM (2009) Organizations that are international from inception. Terminology and research constellations—“academic protectionism” or “academic myopia. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 16(3):406–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welbourne TM, De Ciceri H (2001) How new ventures’ initial public offerings benefit from international operations: a study of human resource value. International Journal of Human Resource Management 12:652–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA (2005) A theory of international new ventures: a decade of research. Journal of International Business Studies 36(1):20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA, George G (2002) International entrepreneurship: the current status of the field and future research agenda’, chapter 12, part V. In: Hitt MA, Ireland RD, Camp SM, Sexton DL (eds) Strategic entrepreneurship. Creating a new mindset. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 255–288

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wants to thank three anonymous reviewers as well as the editor for very helpful comments and suggestions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tage Koed Madsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Madsen, T.K. Early and rapidly internationalizing ventures: Similarities and differences between classifications based on the original international new venture and born global literatures. J Int Entrep 11, 65–79 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-012-0099-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-012-0099-0

Keywords

Navigation