Abstract
The novel contribution of this article is that it compares classifications of early and rapidly internationalizing firms based on the original literature on International New Ventures (classification method based on speed and scope of internationalization) as well as the original literature on Born Globals (classification method based on speed and extent of internationalization). Evidence from a survey of almost 900 Danish manufacturers demonstrates that the two methods provide similar results with regard to overall patterns of internationalization, but that they classify individual firms quite differently. From a theoretical stance it is therefore recommended to incorporate a richer selection of indicators (aspects of speed, scope as well as extent) in order to secure higher comparability between studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Autio E, Sapienza HJ, Almeida JG (2000) Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal 43(5):909–924
Aspelund A, Madsen TK, Moen Ø (2007) A review of the foundation, international marketing strategies, and performance of international new ventures. European Journal of Marketing 41(11/12):1423–1448
Baum M, Schwens C, Kabst R (2011) A typology of international new ventures: empirical evidence form high-tech industries. Journal of Small Business Management 49(3):305–330
Burgel O, Murray GC (2000) The international market entry choices of start-up companies in high-technology industries. Journal of International Marketing 8(2):33–62
Cesinger B, Fink M, Madsen TK, Kraus S (2012) Rapidly internationalizing ventures: how definitions can bridge the gap across contexts. Management Decision 50(10):1816–1842
Coviello NE, Jones MV (2004) Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing 19:485–508
Crick D, Chaudhry S, Batstone S (2001) An investigation into the overseas expansion of small asian-owned UK firms. Small Business Economics 16:75–94
Gabrielsson M, Kirpalani VHM, Dimitratos P, Solberg CA, Zucchella A (2008) Conceptualizations to advance born global definition: a research note. Global Business Review 9(1):45–50
Gabrielsson P, Gabrielsson M (2004) Globalizing internationals: portfolio and marketing strategies in the ICT field. International Business Review 13:661–484
Harveston PD, Kedia BL, Davis PSA (2000) Internationalization of born global and gradual globalizing firms: the impact of the manager. Advances in Competitiveness Research 8:92–99
Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (2009) The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: from liability of foreigness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies 40:1411–1431
Johanson J, Vahlne JE (1977) The internationalization process of the firm—a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies 8:23–32
Jolly V, Alahuhta M, Jeanet J-P (1992) Challenging the incumbents: how high-technology start-ups compete globally. Journal of Strategic Change 1:71–82
Keupp MM, Gassmann O (2009) The past and the future of international entrepreneurship: a review and suggestions for developing the field. Journal of Management 35:600–633
Knight, G. (1997) ‘Emerging paradigm for international marketing: the born global firm’, unpublished dissertation, Department of Marketing and Supply Chain Management, Michigan State University
Knight G, Cavusgil ST (1996) The born global firm: a challenge to traditional internationalization theory. Advances in International Marketing 8:11–26
Kuivalainen O, Saarenketo S, Puumalainen K (2012) Start-up patterns of internationalization: a framework and its application in the context of knowledge intensive SMEs. European Management Journal 30:372–385
Madsen TK, Knudsen T (2003) International new ventures: a new organizational form?. In Jim Bell, Trevor Morrow and Denise Crossan (eds) “Conference Proceedings: The Sixth McGill Conference on International Entrepreneurship: Crossing Boundaries and Researching New Futures”, University of Ulster, Magee Campus, No. 111
Madsen TK, Rasmussen E, Servais P (2000) Differences and similarities between born globals and other types of exporters. Advances in International Marketing 10:247–265
Madsen TK, Servais P (1997) The internationalization of born globals: an evolutionary process. International Business Review 6(2):561–583
Matthews JA, Zander I (2007) The international entrepreneurial dynamics of accelerated internationalisation. Journal of International Business Studies 38:187–403
McDougall PP, Oviatt BM, Shrader RC (2003) A comparison of international and domestic new ventures. Journal of International Entrepreneurship 1:59–82
McDougall PP, Oviatt BM (2000) International entrepreneurship: the intersection of two research paths. Acad Manage J 43(5):902–906
McNaughton R (2003) The number of export markets that a firm serves: process models versus the born-global phenomenon. Journal of International Entrepreneurship 1:297–311
Melén S, Nordman ER (2009) The internationalization modes of born globals: a longitudinal study. European Management Journal 27:243–254
Moen Ø (2002) The born globals: a new generation of small European exporters. International Marketing Review 19(2):156–175
Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (2005) Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 29:537–553
Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (1997) Challenges for internationalization process theory: the case of international new ventures. Management International Review 37(2):85–99
Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (1994) Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies 25:45–64, First Quarter
Rennie MW (1993) Global competitiveness: born global. The McKinsey Quarterly 4(4):45–52
Rialp A, Rialp J, Knight G (2005) The phenomenon of international new ventures, global start-ups, and born globals: what do we know after a decade (1993–2002) of exhaustive scientific inquiry. International Business Review 14:147–166
Romanelli E (1991) The evolution of new organizational forms. Annual Review of Sociology 17:79–103
Shrader RC (2001) Collaboration and performance in foreign markets: the case of young high-technology manufacturing firms. Acad Manage J 44:45–60
Schwens C, Kabst R (2009) How early opposed to late internationalizers learn: experience of others and paradigms of interpretation. International Business Review 18:509–522
Svensson G (2006) A quest for a common terminology: the concept of born glocals. Management Decision 44:1311–1317
Svensson G, Payan JM (2009) Organizations that are international from inception. Terminology and research constellations—“academic protectionism” or “academic myopia. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 16(3):406–417
Welbourne TM, De Ciceri H (2001) How new ventures’ initial public offerings benefit from international operations: a study of human resource value. International Journal of Human Resource Management 12:652–668
Zahra SA (2005) A theory of international new ventures: a decade of research. Journal of International Business Studies 36(1):20–28
Zahra SA, George G (2002) International entrepreneurship: the current status of the field and future research agenda’, chapter 12, part V. In: Hitt MA, Ireland RD, Camp SM, Sexton DL (eds) Strategic entrepreneurship. Creating a new mindset. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 255–288
Acknowledgments
The author wants to thank three anonymous reviewers as well as the editor for very helpful comments and suggestions
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Madsen, T.K. Early and rapidly internationalizing ventures: Similarities and differences between classifications based on the original international new venture and born global literatures. J Int Entrep 11, 65–79 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-012-0099-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-012-0099-0