Skip to main content
Log in

Are born globals really born globals? The case of academic spin-offs with long development periods

  • Published:
Journal of International Entrepreneurship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most research on the born global phenomenon investigates firms from the point of their legal founding. Studies in the field of entrepreneurship show nonetheless that international firms undergo long pre-founding periods, which are likely to affect growth and internationalization in newly founded firms. In this study, we investigate three academic spin-offs with advanced technologies that are attractive in a global market. These firms had experienced extended time in developing their technologies, two of them in pre-founding periods. We examine here the networks of academic spin-offs in three stages: idea conception, technology development, and growth and internationalization. The research builds on diverse theories: born global theory, research on academic spin-offs, entrepreneurial firms, and network theory. We use a multiple case study to investigate the three spin-offs and a process approach in interviewing that includes the biographic histories of the focal firms. In analysis, we identify networks that provide financial resources, knowledge, innovation and technology resources, marketing, and reputational resources. Networks acquired at different stages and network changes greatly affected growth and internationalization in the focal firms. We also find that networks and resources acquired in pre-founding periods had great implications for growth and internationalization in the young firms. Our research therefore highlights the problem of age in the born global literature and we argue for the need to include pre-founding periods to better understand the born global phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baum J (1996) Organizational ecology. In: Clegg S, Hardy C, Nord S (eds) Handbook of organization studies. Sage, London, pp 77–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitz J, Feldman MP (2006) Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: a conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. J Technol Transf 31(1):175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callan B (2001) Generating spin-offs: evidence from across the OECD. STI Rev 26:13–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Capaldo A (2007) Network structure and innovation: the leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Strateg Manag J 28:585–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper RG, Edgett SJ, Kleinschmidt EJ (2002) Optimizing the stage-gate process: what best—practice companies do—part 1. Res Tech Manag 45(5):21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Coviello N (2006) The network dynamics of international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 37:713–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Coviello NE, Munro HJ (1995) Growing the entrepreneurial firm: networking for international market development. Eur J Mark 29(7):49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisman JJ (1999) The influence of outsider-generated knowledge resources on venture creation. J Small Bus Manag 37(4):42–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):443–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manag J 50(1):25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis P (2000) Social ties and foreign market entry. J Int Bus Stud 31(3):443–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz H, Webster A, Gebhardt C, Terra BRC (2000) The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Res Policy 29(2):313–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira M P, Tavares A T, Hesterley W, Armagan S (2006) Network and firm antecedents of spin-offs: motherhooding spin offs, 99. Working papers (FEP). Universidade do Porto, pp 1–30

  • Gabrielsson M, Kirpalani VHM, Dimitratos P, Solberg CA, Zuccella A (2008) Born-globals: propositions to help advance the theory. Int Bus Rev 17(4):385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandi A, Grimaldi R (2003) Exploring the networking characteristics of new venture founding teams. Small Bus Econ 21(4):329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilsing VA, Van Burg E, Romme AGL (2010) Policy principles for the creation and success of corporate and academic spin-offs. Technovation 30:12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati R, Nohria N, Zaheer A (2000) Strategic networks. Strateg Manag J 21(3):203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan M, Freeman J (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Am Sociol Rev 49:149–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hite JM, Hesterly WS (2001) The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm. Strateg Manag J 22(3):275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang H, Antoncic B (2003) Network-based research in entrepreneurship: a critical review. J Bus Ventur 18(2):165–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson J, Vahlne JE (1992) Management of foreign market entry. Scand Int Bus Rev 1(3):9–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsen SMF (2007) The born global—redefined. On the determinants of SMEs pace of internationalization. Series of dissertations 2/2007, BI Norwegian School of Management

  • Kiederich A, Kraus S (2009) Investigating new technology-based firm internationalization: the impact on performance, the process and the antecedents. Int J Bus Res 9(2):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight GA, Cavusgil ST (1996) The born global firm: a challenge to traditional internationalization theory. Adv Int Mark 8:11–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight GA, Cavusgil ST (2004) Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. J Int Bus Stud 35:124–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechner C, Dowling M (2003) Firm networks: external relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Enterpren Reg Dev 15:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao J, Welsch H (2008) Patterns of venture gestation process: exploring the differences between tech and non-tech nascent entrepreneurs. J High Tech Manag Res 19:103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm Dahlstrand Å (2001) Entrepreneurial origin and spin-off performance: a comparison between corporate and university spin-offs. In: Moncada-Paternò-Castello P et al (eds) Corporate and research-based spin-offs: drivers for knowledge-based innovation and entrepreneurship. IPTS Technical Report Series, European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm Dahlstrand Å (2008) University knowledge transfer and the role of academic spin-offs. In: Potter J (ed) Entrepreneurship and higher education. OECD Publication, pp 235–254

  • Madsen K, Servais P (1997) The internationalization of born globals: an evolutionary process? Int Bus Rev 6(6):561–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman GD, Siegel DS, Wright M (2008) Research and technology commercialization. J Manag Stud 45:1401–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller K (2010) Academic spin-off’s transfer speed—analyzing the time from leaving university to venture. Res Policy 39(2):189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustar P (1997) Spin-off enterprises: how French academics create hi-tech companies: the conditions for success or failure. Sci Public Policy 24:37–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustar P, Renault M, Colombo MG, Piva E, Fontes M, Lockett A, Wright M, Clarysse B, Moray N (2006) Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: a multi-dimensional taxonomy. Res Policy 35(2):289–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndonzuau FN, Pirnay F, Surlemont B (2002) A stage model of academic spin-off creation. Technovation 22:281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojala A (2009) Internationalization of knowledge-intensive SMEs: the role of network relationships in the entry to a psychically distant market. Int Bus Rev 18:50–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt BM, McDougall P (2005) Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 29:537–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez M, Sánchez AM (2003) The development of university spin-offs: early dynamics of technology transfer and networking. Technovation 23(10):823–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rialp A, Rialp J, Knight GA (2005) The phenomenon of early internationalizing firms: what do we know after a decade (1993-2003) of scientific inquiry? Int Bus Rev 14:147–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz A, Borghoff T, Kraus S (2009) International entrepreneurship: towards a theory of SME Internationalization. Int J Bus Econ 9(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutjens V, Stam E (2003) The evolution and nature of young firm networks: a longitudinal perspective. Small Bus Econ 21(82):115–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma DD, Blomstermo A (2003) The internationalization process of born globals: a network view. Int Bus Rev 2:739–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe A (1965) Social structure and organizations. In: March JG (ed) Handbook of organizations. Rand-McNally, Chicago, pp 142–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Styles C, Genua T (2008) The rapid internationalization of high technology firms created through the commercialization of academic research. J World Bus 43:146–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2008) Product design and development, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Burg E, Romme GL, Gilsing VA, Reymen IMMJ (2008) Creating university spin-offs: a science-based design perspective. J Prod Innov Manag 25:114–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven AH, Venkataraman S, Polley D, Garud R (2000) Business innovation processes in different organizational settings. In: Van de Ven AH, Angle HL, Poole MS (eds) Research on the management of innovation: the Minnesota studies. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson HIM, Appiah-Kubi K (2002) Resource leveraging via networks by high technology entrepreneurial firms. J High Tech Manag Res 13(1):45–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright M, Birley S, Mosey S (2004) Entrepreneurship and university technology transfer. J Technol Transf 29:235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2009) Case study research. Design and methods. Fourth edition, volume 5. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA (2005) A theory of international new ventures: a decade of research. J Int Bus Stud 36(1):20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA, Van de Velde Els, Larrañeta B (2007) Knowledge conversion capability and the performance of corporate and university spin-offs. Ind Corp Chang 16(4):569–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the valuable comments from editor and reviewers. We also acknowledge the financial support from The Research Council of Norway and two regional cluster organizations that approved our research, and we are grateful for firms’ contributions to the project. We also thank research colleagues for helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inger Beate Pettersen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pettersen, I.B., Tobiassen, A.E. Are born globals really born globals? The case of academic spin-offs with long development periods. J Int Entrep 10, 117–141 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-012-0086-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-012-0086-5

Keywords

Navigation