Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Summer floods shape meadow butterfly communities in a floodplain nature reserve in Central Europe

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How flooding regimes shape temperate-zone butterfly communities has received little attention. At the river Danube in eastern Austria, a levee has largely interrupted natural river dynamics since the late nineteenth century. Only a fraction of the floodplain area still experiences annual summer inundations after snow-melt in the Alps. We surveyed meadow butterfly communities on either side of the levee in a year with an unusually strong flood (2013), and in a season with a weak flood typical for the region (2012). Altogether we observed 67 butterfly species. Butterfly abundance and species richness were lower on meadows with stronger flood impact, but differences were modest. In contrast, species composition differed prominently relative to flooding regime and nectar availability. Grass-feeding species tended to be rarer on flooded meadows, while Brassicaceae-feeding species were more prevalent on nutrient-rich flood-prone meadows. Highly dispersive butterflies made up a larger share on flooded meadows, whereas highly philopatric species were relatively more common at sites with little or no inundation. These results indicate that summer inundations at the river Danube act as filters for the local species composition of butterflies on floodplain meadows. Local resource availability and the differential potential of species to re-colonize meadows after catastrophic floods are likely drivers of these differences. Effects of inundations were not consistently stronger in a year of a catastrophic flood than in a normal season. Butterfly communities on non-flooded meadows had a higher regional conservation value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adis J, Junk WJ (2002) Terrestrial invertebrates inhabiting lowland river floodplains of Central Amazonia and Central Europe: a review. Freshwater Biol 47:711–731. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00892.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson M, Gorley RN, Clarke RK (2008) Permanova+ for Primer: Guide to software and statistical methods. Primer-E, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballinger A, Lake P, Nally RM (2007) Do terrestrial invertebrates experience floodplains as landscape mosaics? Immediate and longer-term effects of flooding on ant assemblages in a floodplain forest. Oecologia 152:227–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bink FA (1992) Ecologische atlas van de dagvlinders van Noordwest-Europa. Schuyt, Haarlem

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonn A, Hagen K, Wohlgemuth-von Reiche D (2002) The significance of flood regimes for carabid beetle and spider communities in riparian habitats, a comparison of three major rivers in Germany. River Res Appl 18:43–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croxton PJ, Hann JP, Greatorex-Davies JN, Sparks TH (2005) Linear hotspots? The floral and butterfly diversity of green lanes. Biol Conserv 121:579–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demetz A, Fiedler K, Dreschke T, Schulze CH (2013) Natural floodplain dynamics shape grasshopper assemblages of meadows in the Donau-Auen National Park (Austria). 5th Symp Res Protected Areas, Mittersill, Austria

  • Dziock F, Gerisch M, Siegert M, Hering I, Scholz M, Ernst R (2011) Reproducing or dispersing? Using trait based habitat templet models to analyse Orthoptera response to flooding and land use. Agric Ecosyst Environ 145:85–94. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert G (1993) Die Schmetterlinge Baden-Württembergs, Band 1 Tagfalter 1. 1991 Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart

  • Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Düll R, Wirth V, Werner W, Paulißen D (1992) Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa, 2nd ed. Scr Geobot 18:9–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler K, Truxa C (2012) Species richness measures fail in resolving diversity patterns of speciose forest moth assemblages. Biodiv Conserv 21:2499–2508. doi:10.1007/s10531-012-0311-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerisch M, Schanowski A, Figura W, Gerken B, Dziock F, Henle K (2006) Carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) as indicators of hydrological site conditions in floodplain grasslands. Int Rev Hydrobiol 91:326–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2011) Estimating species richness. Biol Divers Front Meas Assess 12:39–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratzer M, Rabitsch W, Schulze CH (2012) Impact of flooding on true bug communities (Heteroptera) on meadows of the Morava River floodplains, Eastern Austria. 5th Symp Res Proteced Areas, Mittersill, Austria

  • Holl KD (1995) Nectar resources and their influence on butterfly communities on reclaimed coal surface mines. Restor Ecol 3:76–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höttinger H, Pendl M, Wiemers M, Pospisil A (2013) Insekten in Wien: Tagfalter. Österr Ges Entomofaunistik, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Huemer P (2013) Die Schmetterlinge Österreichs (Lepidoptera). Systematische und faunistische Checkliste. Tiroler Landesmuseen, Innsbruck

    Google Scholar 

  • Hula V, Konvicka M, Pavlicko A, Fric Z (2004) Marsh Fritillary (Euphydiyas aurinia) in the Czech Republic: monitoring, metapopulation structure and conservation of an endangered butterfly. Entomol Fenn 15(4):231–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Joy J, Pullin AS (1997) The effects of flooding on the survival and behaviour of overwintering large heath butterfly Coenonympha tullia larvae. Biol Conserv 82:61–66. doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(97)00006-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kajzer-Bonk J, Nowicki P, Bonk M, Skórka P, Witek M, Woyciechowski M (2013) Local populations of endangered Maculinea (Phengaris) butterflies are flood resistant. J Insect Conserv 17:1105–1112. doi:10.1007/s10841-013-9591-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh LP, Sodhi NS, Brook BW (2004) Ecological correlates of extinction proneness in tropical butterflies. Conserv Biol 18:1571–1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konvicka M, Nedved O, Fric Z (2002) Early-spring floods decrease the survival of hibernating larvae of a wetland-inhabiting population of Neptis rivularis (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Acta Zool Hung 48:79–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Köppel C (1997) Die Großschmetterlinge (Makrolepidoptera) der Rastatter Rheinaue: Habitatwahl sowie Überflutungstoleranz und Überlebensstrategien bei Hochwasser. Eitschberger, Markleuthen

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2004) Landscape occupancy and local population size depends on host plant distribution in the butterfly Cupido minimus. Biol Conserv 120:355–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Müller CB, Tscharntke T (2005) Relative importance of resource quantity, isolation and habitat quality for landscape distribution of a monophagous butterfly. Ecography 28:465–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latterell JJ, Scott Bechtold J, O’Keefe TC, Van Pelt R, Naiman RJ (2006) Dynamic patch mosaics and channel movement in an unconfined river valley of the Olympic Mountains. Freshwater Biol 51:523–544. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01513.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • León-Cortés JL, Lennon JJ, Thomas CD (2003) Ecological dynamics of extinct species in empty habitat networks. 2. The role of host plant dynamics. Oikos 102:465–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes D, Van Dyck H (2001) Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders (north Belgium): Europe’s worst case scenario? Biol Conserv 99:263–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mucina L, Grabherr G, Ellmauer T, Wallnoefer S (1993) Die Pflanzengesellschaften Österreichs. Fischer, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike N (2011) Using false discovery rates for multiple comparisons in ecology and evolution. Meth Ecol Evol 2:278–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss J, Bridle JR, Montoya JM, Woodward G (2009) Emerging horizons in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research. Trends Ecol Evol 24:505–514. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothenbuecher J, Schaefer M (2005) Conservation of leafhoppers in floodplain grasslands—trade-off between diversity and naturalness in a northern German national park. J Insect Conserv 9:335–349. doi:10.1007/s10841-005-0514-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saarinen K, Valtonen A, Jantunen J, Saarnio S (2005) Butterflies and diurnal moths along road verges: does road type affect diversity and abundance? Biol Conserv 123:403–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz CB, Dlugosch KM (1999) Nectar and hostplant scarcity limit populations of an endangered Oregon butterfly. Oecologia 119:231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Severns PM, Boldt L, Villegas S (2006) Conserving a wetland butterfly: quantifying early lifestage survival through seasonal flooding, adult nectar, and habitat preference. J Insect Conserv 10:361–370. doi:10.1007/s10841-006-9011-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahabuddin G, Herzner GA, Aponte CR, del Gomez MC (2000) Persistence of a frugivorous butterfly species in Venezuelan forest fragments: the role of movement and habitat quality. Biodivers Conserv 9:1623–1641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro AM (2002) The Californian urban butterfly fauna is dependent on alien plants. Divers Distrib 8:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonntag G (1981) Öko-ethologische Untersuchungen zur Sexualbiologie des Schachbrettfalters (Agapetes galathea L.) unter besonderer Berücksichtigung thermobiologischer Aspekte. Z Tierpsychol 56:169–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stettmer C, Bräu M, Gros P, Wanninger O (2011) Die Tagfalter Bayerns und Österreichs. 2nd edn. Bayerische Akademie für Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege, Laufen

  • Strausz M, Fiedler K, Franzén M, Wiemers M (2012) Habitat and host plant use of the Large Copper Butterfly Lycaena dispar in an urban environment. J Insect Conserv 16:709–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA (1983) The ecology and conservation of Lysandra bellargus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Britain. J Appl Ecol 20:59–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD, Jones TM (1993) Partial recovery of a skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) from population refuges: lessons for conservation in a fragmented landscape. J Anim Ecol 62:472–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas J et al (2001) The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc R Soc London B 268:1791–1796

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tockner K, Schiemer F, Ward JV (1998) Conservation by restoration: the management concept for a river-floodplain system on the Danube River in Austria. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwater Ecosyst 8:71–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tropek R, Konvicka M (2010) Forest eternal? Endemic butterflies of the Bamenda highlands, Cameroon, avoid close-canopy forest. Afr J Ecol 48:428–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truxa C, Fiedler K (2012) Down in the flood? How moth communities are shaped in temperate floodplain forests. Insect Conserv Divers 5:389–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Helsdingen PJ (1997) The spiders (Araneida) of Pollardstown Fen, Co Kildare, Ireland. Irish Nat J 25:396–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlberg N, Klemetti T, Hanski I (2002) Dynamic populations in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly. Ecography 25:224–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb MR, Pullin AS (1998) Effects of submergence by winter floods on diapausing caterpillars of a wetland butterfly, Lycaena dispar batavus. Ecol Entomol 23:96–99. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2311.1998.00105.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C (1984) Egg-laying patterns in butterflies in relation to their phenology and the visual apparency and abundance of their host plants. Oecologia 63:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Nationalpark Donau-Auen, and especially Dr. Christian Baumgartner and Karoline Zsak, for arranging the opportunity to conduct this study and Barabara Reischl for her support with the illustrations. Manuela Grijincu and Hannes Horn helped with data collection in 2012. This paper benefitted from constructive comments provided by two anonymous reviewers. Field work was supported through funds from the Faculty of Life Sciences, Univ. of Vienna.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Tropical Ecology and Animal Biodiversity, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030, Vienna, Austria

    Rebecca Fies, Dominik Rabl, Christian H. Schulze & Konrad Fiedler

Authors
  1. Rebecca Fies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dominik Rabl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christian H. Schulze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Konrad Fiedler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Fies.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 116 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fies, R., Rabl, D., Schulze, C.H. et al. Summer floods shape meadow butterfly communities in a floodplain nature reserve in Central Europe. J Insect Conserv 20, 433–445 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-016-9876-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-016-9876-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation