Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Winter-green host-plants, litter quantity and vegetation structure are key determinants of habitat quality for Coenonympha oedippus in Europe

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The knowledge on species’ habitat preferences at local scales across its range is an essential condition for defining the most appropriate habitat management for the conservation of any species. In this study, we combined field observations from three European countries with breeding experiments under field conditions to identify oviposition and larval preferences of Coenonympha oedippus at the micro-scale level across contrasting habitat types (wet vs. dry). Despite the wide geographical range and the different habitats we found some common features: (1) vegetation structure of the herb layer is an essential factor for oviposition site electivity and successful development of premature stages; (2) high cover of litter and/or dwarf shrubs in the microhabitat (larval 45–70 %, oviposition 40–50 %) creates a herb layer rich in gaps; at their edges eggs are deposited and the caterpillars are adequately sun-exposed; (3) egg-laying females are not selective regarding oviposition substratum; (4) oviposition height is adjusted to positions with direct sunlight or warm substratum; (5) the host-plants coverage in oviposition sites was high: between 45 and 50 % in wet habitats, and between 18 and 41 % in dry habitats (depending on whether only plants observed as hosts in this study are counted, or whether all potential host species are included); (6) the most important host-plant is Carex panicea (wet) and Carex humilis (dry), but Molinia caerulea (wet) and Festuca rupicola (dry) are also used regularly; (7) the availability of winter-green host-plants in the vicinity of hibernated larvae plays a substantial role in their survival. As regular mowing or grazing would remove the litter and destroy the gaps, the management should be restricted to selective reed cutting or manual shrub removal. Only selective mowing during winter (December–February) can be recommended for keeping the habitat open where the reduction of bushes is not sufficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthes N, Fartmann T, Hermann G, Kaule G (2003) Combining larval habitat quality and metapopulation structure—the key for successful management of pre-alpine Euphydryas aurinia colonies. J Insect Conserv 7:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthes N, Fartmann T, Hermann G (2008) The Duke of Burgundy butterfly and its dukedom: larval niche variation in Hamearis lucina across Central Europe. J Insect Conserv 12:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awmack CS, Leather SR (2002) Host plant quality and fecunditiy in herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 47:817–844

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balletto E, Bonelli S, Cassulo L (2007) Insecta Lepidoptera Papilionoidea. In: Ruffo S, Stoch F (eds) Checklist and Distribution of the Italian Fauna. 10.000 terrestrial and inland water species, 2nd and revised edition, Verona, pp 257–261

  • Balletto E, Bonelli S, Zilli A (2014) Lepidotteri. In: Genovesi P, Angelini P, Bianchi E, Dupré E, Ercole S, Giacanelli V, Ronchi F, Stoch F Specie e habitat di interesse comunitario in Italia: distribuzione, stato di conservazione e trend. ISPRA, Serie Rapporti, 194/2014

  • Beyer LJ, Schultz CB (2010) Oviposition selection by rare grass skipper Polites mardon in montane habitats: advancing ecological understanding to develop conservation strategies. Biol Conserv 143:862–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bischof A (1968) Coenonympha oedippus Fabricius, eine kleine Chorographie (Lepidoptera, Satyridae). Mitt Ent Ges Basel 18:41–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonelli S, Canterino S, Balletto E (2010) Ecology of Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Italy. Oedippus 26:25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräu M, Dolek M (2013) Wald-Wiesenvögelchen Coenonympha hero (Linnaeus, 1758). In: Bräu M, Bolz R, Kolbeck H, Nunner A, Voith J, Wolf W (eds) Tagfalter in Bayern. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, pp 472–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräu M, Schwibinger M (2013) Moor-Wiesenvögelchen Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787). In: Bräu M, Bolz R, Kolbeck H, Nunner A, Voith J, Wolf W (eds) Tagfalter in Bayern. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, pp 460–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräu M, Dolek M, Stettmer C (2010) Habitat requirements, larval development and food preferences of the German population of the False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)—research on the ecological needs to develop management tools. Oedippus 26:41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Čelik T (1997) Ecological researches of endangered species Coenonympha oedippus Fabricius, 1787 (Lepidoptera: Satyridae) on the Ljubljansko barje. M.Sc. thesis; University of Ljubljana

  • Čelik T (2003) Population structure, migration and conservation of Coenonympha oedippus Fabricius, 1787 (Lepidoptera: Satyridae) in a fragmented landscape. Ph.D. thesis; University of Ljubljana

  • Čelik T (2004) Population dynamics of endangered species Coenonympha oedippus Fabricius, 1787 (Lepidoptera: Satyridae) on the Ljubljansko barje. Acta Entomol Slov 12:99–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Čelik T, Verovnik R (2010) Distribution, habitat preferences and population ecology of the False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Slovenia. Oedippus 26:7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Čelik T, Vreš B, Seliškar A (2009a) Determinants of within-patch microdistribution and movements of endangered butterfly Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) Nymphalidae: Satyrinae). Hacquetia 8(2):115–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Čelik T, Vreš B, Seliškar A (2009b) The status of populations and habitats and recommendations for monitoring of threatened species False Ringlet (Coenonympha oedippus), Snake’shead fritillary (Fritillaria meleagris) and Loesel’s twayblade (Liparis loeselii) on Ljubljansko barje. Final report (in Slovene with English Summary). Biološki inštitut ZRC SAZU, Ljubljana

  • Chrétien MP (1886) Une note sur les premiers ćtats du Coenonympha oedippus. In: Bourgeois MJ (ed) Séance du 13 octobre 1886 (Bulletin entomologique). Ann Soc Entomol Fr 6:638 (157)

  • De Vries HH, Ens SH, de Graaf G, Teunissen L, van der Velde R, Vogelaar L, Winterink A, Visser ME (2011) Synchronisation of egg hatching of brown hairstreak (Thecla betulae) and budburst of blackthorn (Prunus spinosa) in a warmer future. J Insect Conserv 15:311–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH (2003) Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos 102:417–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2006) Habitats and resources: the need for a resource-based definition to conserve butterflies. Biodivers Conserv 15:1943–1966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierks K (2006) Beobachtungen zur Larvalbiologie von Coenonympha oedippus (Ffabricius, 1787) im Südwesten Frankreichs (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). Entomol Z 116(4):186–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Doak P (2000) Population consequences of restricted dispersal for an insect herbivore in a subdivided habitat. Ecology 81:1828–1841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doak P, Kareiva P, Kingsolver J (2006) Fitness consequences of choosy oviposition for time-limited butterfly. Ecology 87:395–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dolek M (2011) Wald-Wiesenvögelchen Coenonympha hero (Linnaeus, 1758). Merkblatt Artenschutz 37, Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Augsburg

  • Dolek M, Geyer A (2001) Der Violette Feuerfalter (Lycaena alciphron): Artenhilfsprogramm für einen wenig bekannten Tagfalter. Schriftenreihe des Bayerischen LfU 156:341–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolek M, Geyer A, Bolz R (1998) Distribution of Maculinea rebeli and host plant use along the river Danube. J Insect Conserv 2:85–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolek M, Freese A, Geyer A, Stetter H (2005) The decline of Colias myrmidone at the western edge of its range and notes on its habitat requirements. Biologia 60:607–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolek M, Freese-Hager A, Geyer A, Balletto E, Bonelli S (2013) Multiple oviposition and larval feeding strategies in Euphydryas maturna (Linné, 1758) (Nymphalidae) at two disjoint European sites. J Insect Conserv 17:357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dušej G, Wemeille E, Carron G, Ziegler H (2010) Concerning the situation of the False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Switzerland. Oedippus 26:38–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilers S, Pettersson LB, Öckinger E (2013) Micro-climate determines oviposition site selection and abundance in the butterfly Pyrgus armoricanus at its northern range margin. Ecol Entomol 38:183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H (2009) Vegetation ecology of Central Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fartmann T (2005) Quendel-Ameisenbläuling Glaucopsyche arion (Linnaeus, 1758). Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt 20:175–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortunel C, Garnier E, Joffre R, Kazakou E, Quested H, Grigulis K, Lavorel S, Ansquer P, Castro H, Cruz P (2009) Leaf traits capture the effects of land use changes and climate on litter decomposability in grasslands across Europe. Ecology 90:598–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer A, Dolek M (1995) Ökologie und Schutz des Apollofalters (Parnassius apollo) in der Frankenalb. Mitt Dt Gesell Allg Ang Ent 10:333–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyer A, Dolek M (2013) Gelbringfalter Lopinga achine (Scopoli, 1763). In: Bräu M, Bolz R, Kolbeck H, Nunner A, Voith J, Wolf W (eds) Tagfalter in Bayern. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, pp 452–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorbunov P, Kosterin O (2007) The butterflies (Hesperioidea in et Papilionidea) of North Asia (assian part of Russia) in nature, vol 2. Rodina and Fodio, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradl F (1946) Coenonympha oedippus F. Z Wien Ent Ges 30:14–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Gripenberg S, Mayhew PJ, Parnell M, Roslin T (2010) A meta-analysis of preference–performance relationships in phytophagous insects. Ecol Lett 13:383–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Habeler H (1972) Zur Kenntnis der Lebensräume von Coenonympha oedippus F. (Lep. Satyridae). Nachr Bayer Ent 21(3):51–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafner J (1910) Makrolepidopteren von Görz und Umgebung. Entomologischen Zeitschrift, Sonder-Abdruck, pp 1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann G, Steiner R (1997) Eiablage und Larvalhabitat des Komma-Dickkopffalters (Hesperia comma Linnaeus 1758) in Baden-Württemberg (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae). Carolinea 55:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Janz N (2002) Evolutionary ecology of oviposition strategies. In: Hilker M, Meiners T (eds) Chemoecology of insect eggs and egg deposition. Blackwell, Berlin, pp 349–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalarus K, Skórka P, Nowicki P (2013) Resource use in two contrasting habitat types raises different challenges for the conservation of the dryad butterfly Minois dryas. J Insect Conserv 17:777–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassai F, Peregovits L (2005) Contrasting egg laying behaviour of the ecotypes of Maculinea alcon in Hungary. In: Settele J, Kühn E, Thomas JA (eds) Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, Vol 2. Species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a Model. Sofia-Moskau, Pensoft Publishers, p 73

  • Kolar H (1919) Über das Vorkommen von Coenonympha oedippus F. Z Österr Entomol Ver Wien 4:96

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolar H (1929) Verbreitung von Coenonympha oedippus F. in Europa. Verh Zoo Bot Ver Wien 78:105–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Königsdorfer M (1997) Die Berghexe (Chazara briseis L.) in Schwaben und angrenzenden Gebieten. Ber Nat Ver Schwaben 101:69–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Konvička M, Dvořak L, Pavličko A, Fric Z (2008) The Baton blue (Pseudophilotes baton) (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) in south-western Bohemia: iron curtain, military ranges and endangered butterfly. Silva Gabreta 14:187–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Krämer B, Kämpf I, Enderle J, Poniatowski D, Fartmann T (2012) Microhabitat selection in a grassland butterfly: a trade-off between microclimate and food availability. J Insect Conserv 16:857–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kudrna O, Harpke A, Lux K, Pennerstorfer J, Schweiger O, Settele J, Wiemers M (2011) Distribution Atlas of Butterflies in Europe. Gesellschaft für Schmetterlingsschutz e.V, Halle

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafranchis T (2000) Les Papillions de jour de France. Collection Parthenope, editions Biotope, Meze, Belgique et Luxembourg et leurs chenilles

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauber K, Wagner G (1996) Flora Helvetica. Paul Haupt, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson CR, Bennie J, Hodgson JA, Thomas CD, Wilson RJ (2014) Topographic microclimates drive microhabitat associations at the range margin of a butterfly. Ecography 37:732–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold P (2001) Schmetterlingszönosen ausgewählter Kalk-Magerrasen im Saale-Unstrut-Gebiet (Sachsen-Anhalt) unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Habitate des Segelfalters und der Berghexe. Dipl.-Arb. Inst. F. Landschaftsökologie, Univ. Münster

  • Lhonore J (1996) Coenonympha oedippus. In: Helsdingen van PJ, Willemse L, Speight MCD. (eds) Background information on invertebrates of the habitats directive and the bern convention. Part I—Crustacea, Coleoptera and Lepidoptera. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, Nature and environment 79:98–104

  • Lhonore J, Lagarde M (1999) Biogeographie, ecologie et protection de Coenonympha oedippus (Fab., 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae). Ann Soc Entomol Fr 35(Suppl):299–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindman L, Johansson B, Gotthard K, Tammmaru T (2013) Host plant relationships of an endangered butterfly, Lopinga achine (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in northern Europe. J Insect Conserv 17:375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loydi A, Eckstein RL, Otte A, Donath T (2013) Effects of litter on seedling establishment in natural and semi-natural grasslands: a meta-analysis. J Ecol 101:454–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew PJ (1997) Adaptive patterns of host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Oikos 79:417–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möllenbeck V, Hermann G, Fartmann T (2009) Does prescribed burning mean a threat to the rare satyrine butterfly Hipparchia fagi? Larval-habitat preferences give the answer. J Insect Conserv 13:77–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munguira ML, García-Barros E, Cano JM (2009) Butterfly herbivory and larval ecology. In: Settele J, Shreeve T, Konvička M, Van Dyck H (eds) Ecology of butterflies in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 43–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunner A (1995) Zur Autökologie von Boloria eunomia (Esper 1799) und Lycaena helle (Denis & Schiffermueller 1775) (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) im bayerischen Alpenvorland. Dipl. Thesis, Universität Tübingen

  • Obermaier E, Heisswolf A, Randlkofer B, Meiners T (2006) Enemies in low places—insects avoid winter mortality and egg parasitism by modulating oviposition height. B Entomol Res 96:337–343

  • O’Connor RS, Hails RS, Thomas JA (2014) Accounting for habitat when considering climate: has the niche of the Adonis blue butterfly changed in the UK? Oecologia 174:1463–1472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Örvössy N, Vozár Á, Kőrösi Á, Batáry P, Peregovits L (2010) Structure and size of a threatened population of the False Ringelt Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Hungary. Oedippus 26:31–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Örvössy N, Vozár Á, Kőrösi Á, Batáry P, Peregovits L (2013) Potential metapopulation structure and the effects of habitat quality on population size of the endangered False Ringlet butterfly. J Insect Conserv 17:537–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauler R, Kaule G, Verhaagh M, Settele J (1995) Untersuchungen zur Autökologie des Schwarzgefleckten Ameisenbläulings, Maculinea arion (Linnaeus 1758) (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) in Südwestdeutschland. Nachr Entomol Ver Apollo 16:147–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennekamp F, Monteiro E, Schmitt T (2013) The larval ecology of the butterfly Euphydryas desfontainii (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in SW Portugal: food plant quantity and quality as main predictors of habitat quality. J Insect Conserv 17:195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruehl (1895) Die paläarktischen Großschmetterlinge und ihre Naturgeschichte. Lief. 55, Leipzig

  • Ruprecht E, Szabo A (2012) Grass litter is a natural seed trap in long-term undisturbed grassland. J Veg Sci 23:495–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruprecht E, Enyedi MZ, Eckstein RL, Donath TW (2010) Restorative removal of plant litter and vegetation 40 years after abandonment enhances re-emergence of steppe grassland vegetation. Biol Conserv 143:449–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachteleben J, Winterholler M (2013) Blaukernauge Minois dryas (Scopoli, 1763). In: Bräu M, Bolz R, Kolbeck H, Nunner A, Voith J, Wolf W (eds) Tagfalter in Bayern. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, pp 527–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Šašić M (2010) False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Croatia: current status, population dynamics and conservation management. Oedippus 26:16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Selezniew M, Pałka K, Michalczuk W, Bystrowski C, Hołowiński M, Czerwiński M (2010) False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Poland: state of knowledge and conservation prospects. Oedippus 26:20–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Settele J, Kudrna O, Hharpke A, Kühn I, van Swaay C, Verovnik R, Warren M, Wiemers M, Hanspach J, Hickler T, Kühn E, van Halder I, Veling K, Vliegenthart A, Wynhoff I, Schweiger O (2008) Climatic risk atlas of European butterflies. Pensoft, Sofia-Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc (1989–2004) SPSS for Windows. Release 13.0 (1 Sep 2004)

  • Steiner R, Hermann G (1999) Freilandbeobachtungen zu Eiablageverhalten und –habitat des Wald-Wiesenvögelchen, Coenonympha hero (Linnaeus, 1761), an einer Flugstelle in Baden-Württemberg. Nach Entomol Ver Apollo 20:111–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson RD (1985) The relative importance of behavioral and physiological adjustments controlling temperature in terrestrial ecotherms. Am Nat 126:362–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuhldreher G, Fartmann T (2014) When habitat management can be a bad thing: effects of habitat quality, isolation and climate on a declining grassland butterfly. J Insect Conserv 18:965–979

  • Szentirmai I, Mesterházy A, Varga I, Schubert Z, Sándor LC, Ábrahám L, Kőrösi Á (2014) Habitat use and population biology of the Danube Clouded Yellow butterfly Colias myrmidone (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) in Romania. J Insect Conserv 18:417–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA (1980) Why did the large blue become extinct in Britain? Oryx 15:243–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA (1983) The ecology and conservation of Lysandra bellargus (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) in Britain. J Appl Ecol 20:59–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA (1993) Holocene climate change and warm man-made refugia may explain why a sixth of british butterflies inhabit unnatural early successional habitats. Ecography 16:278–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Elmes GW (2001) Food-plant niche selection rather than the presence of ant nests explains oviposition patterns in the myrmecophilous butterfly genus Maculinea. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:471–477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tshikolovets VV (2003) Butterflies of Eastern Europe. Urals and Caucasus, Brno

    Google Scholar 

  • Turlure C, Choutt J, Baguette M, van Dyck H (2010) Microclimatic buffering and resource-based habitat in a glacial relict butterfly: significance for conservation under climate change. Glob Change Biol 16:1883–1893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turlure C, Radchuk V, Baguette M, van Dyck H, Schtickzelle N (2011) On the significance of structural vegetation elements for caterpillar thermoregulation in two peat bog butterflies: boloria eunomia and B. aquilonaris. J Therm Biol 36:173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turlure C, Radchuk V, Baguette M, Meijrink M, van den Burg A, WallisDeVries M, van Duinen GJ (2013) Plant quality and local adaptation undermine relocation in a bog specialist butterfly. Ecol Evol 3:244–254

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyck H (2012) Changing organisms in rapidly changing anthropogenic landscapes: the significance of the “Umwelt”-concept and functional habitat for animal conservation. Evol Appl 5:144–153

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Swaay CAM, Cuttelod A, Collins S, Maes D, Munguira López M, Šašić M, Settele J, Verovnik R, Verstrael T, Warren M, Wiemers M, Wynhoff I (2010) European red list of butterflies. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner W (2010) Europäische Schmetterlinge und ihre Ökologie. www.pyrgus.de

  • WallisDeVries MF, van Swaay CAM (2006) Global warming and excess nitrogen may induce butterfly decline by microclimate cooling. Glob Change Biol 12:1620–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward G, Hastie T, Barry S, Elith J, Leathwick JR (2009) Presence-only data and the EM algorithm. Biometrics 65:554–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weidemann HJ (1995) Tagfalter: beobachten, bestimmen. 2nd Ed., völlig neu bearb. Aufl. Naturbuch, Augsburg

  • Weking S, Hermann G, Fartmann T (2013) Effects of mire type, land use and climate on a strongly declining wetland butterfly. J Insect Conserv 17:1081–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C (1984) Egg-laying patterns in butterflies in relation to their phenology and visual apparency and abundance of their host plants. Oecologia 63:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalucki MP, Clarke AR, Malcolm SB (2002) Ecology and behaviour of first instar larval Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 47:361–393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to all colleagues, who contributed to this study in providing information on other populations in Europe and beyond, and to two anonymous referees for suggestions that greatly improved the manuscript. We are grateful to R. Völkl and T. Hermann for support during field work, and to Giorgio Buffa for the determination of the Italian plant species. We also particularly thank the Bavarian Academy for Nature Conservation and Landscape Management (ANL) for funding this project. Many thanks also to the Bavarian State Office for Environment for financing the investigations in all previous years and to the Government of Upper Bavaria as well as local nature conservation authorities for their support. The Slovenian part of study was partly funded by the Slovenian Research Agency (P1-0236).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jovan Hadži Institute of Biology, Scientific Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Novi trg 2, P. O. Box 306, 1001, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Tatjana Čelik & Branko Vreš

  2. Büro für ökologische Gutachten M. Bräu, Amperstr. 13, 80638, Munich, Germany

    Markus Bräu

  3. Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Via Accademia Albertina 13, 10123, Turin, Italy

    Simona Bonelli, Cristiana Cerrato & Emilio Balletto

  4. Bayerische Akademie für Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung (ANL), 83406, Laufen/Salzach, Germany

    Christian Stettmer

  5. Ökologische Forschung und Planung, Geyer und Dolek, Alpenblick 12, 82237, Wörthsee, Germany

    Matthias Dolek

Authors
  1. Tatjana Čelik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Markus Bräu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Simona Bonelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cristiana Cerrato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Branko Vreš
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Emilio Balletto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Christian Stettmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Matthias Dolek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatjana Čelik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Čelik, T., Bräu, M., Bonelli, S. et al. Winter-green host-plants, litter quantity and vegetation structure are key determinants of habitat quality for Coenonympha oedippus in Europe. J Insect Conserv 19, 359–375 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-014-9736-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-014-9736-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation