Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patch occupancy in the endangered butterfly Lycaena helle in a fragmented landscape: effects of habitat quality, patch size and isolation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While there is agreement that both habitat quality and habitat network characteristics (such as patch size and isolation) contribute to the occupancy of patches by any given species, the relative importance of these factors is under debate. This issue is of fundamental ecological importance, and moreover of special concern for conservation biologists aiming at preserving endangered species. Against this background we investigated patch occupancy in the violet copper Lycaena helle, one of the rarest butterfly species in Central Europe, in the Westerwald area (Rhineland-Palatinate, Western Germany). Occupied (n = 102) differed from vacant (n = 128) patches in altitude, size, connectivity, availability of wind shelter, in the abundance of the larval host-plant, in the abundance of a grass species indicating favorable habitat conditions and in the abundance of nitrophilous plants. Overall, patch occupancy was primarily determined by patch size, connectivity and the abundance of the larval host plant, while all other parameters of habitat quality were of subordinate importance. Therefore, our findings suggest that even for extremely sedentary species such as L. helle habitat networks are decisive and—next to the preservation of habitat quality—need to be an integral part of any conservation management for this species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthes N, Fartmann T, Hermann G, Kaule G (2003) Combining larval habitat quality and metapopulation structure – the key for successful management of pre-alpine Euphydryas aurinia colonies. J Insect Conserv 7:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong DP (2005) Integrating the metapopulation and habitat paradigms for understanding broad-scale declines of species. Conserv Biol 19:1402–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baguette M (2003) Long distance dispersal and landscape occupancy in a metapopulation of the cranberry fritillary butterfly. Ecography 26:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender DJ, Contreras TA, Fahrig L (1998) Habitat loss and population decline: a meta-analysis of the patch size effect. Ecology 79:517–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betzholtz P-E, Ehrig A, Lindeborg M, Dinnétz P (2007) Food plant density, patch isolation and vegetation height determine occurrence in a Swedish metapopulation of the marsh fritillary Euphydryas aurinia (Rottemburg, 1775) (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). J Insect Conserv 11:343–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binzenhöfer B, Schröder B, Strauss B, Biedermann R, Settele J (2005) Habitat models and habitat connectivity analysis for butterflies and burnet moths—the example of Zygaena carniolica and Coenonympha arcania. Biol Conserv 126:247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binzenhöfer B, Biedermann R, Settele J, Schroeder B (2008) Connectivity compensates for low habitat quality and small patch size in the butterfly Cupido minimus. Ecol Res 23:259–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourn NAD, Thomas JA (1993) The ecology and conservation of the brown argus butterfly Aricia agestis in Britain. Biol Conserv 63:67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH, Eales HT (1997) Patch occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Müller, 1764) (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae): habitat quality matters as much as patch size and isolation. J Insect Conserv 1:167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH, Eales HT (1999) Probability of site occupancy in the large heath butterfly Coenonympha tullia determined from geographical and ecological data. Biol Conserv 87:295–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH, Hardy PB (2007) Support for mending the matrix: resource seeking by butterflies in apparent non-resource zones. J Insect Conserv 11:157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG (1996) Butterflies on British and Irish Offshore Islands. Gem Publishing Company, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH, Sparks TH (2006) When is a habitat not a habitat? Dramatic resource use changes under differing weather conditions for the butterfly Plebejus argus. Biol Conserv 129:291–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, van Dyck H (2006) Habitats and resources: the need for a resource-based definition to conserve butterflies. Biodivers Conserv 15:1943–1966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dover JW, Sparks TH, Greatorex-Davies JN (1997) The importance of shelter for butterflies in open landscapes. J Insect Conserv 1:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert G, Rennwald E (1993) Die Schmetterlinge Baden-Württembergs, Tagfalter. Ulmer Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Elligsen H, Beinlich B, Plachter H (1997) Effects of large scale grazing on populations of Coenonympha glycerion and Lasiommata megera (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). J Insect Conserv 1:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer K, Beinlich B, Plachter H (1999) Population structure, mobility and habitat preferences of the violet copper Lycaena helle (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Western Germany: implications for conservation. J Insect Cons 3:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1994) Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol 9:131–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (2001) Spatially realistic theory of metapopulation ecology. Naturwissenschaften 88:372–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Pakkala T, Kuussaari M, Lei G (1995) Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscape. Oikos 72:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes KJ, Dillemuth FP, Anderson BJ, Hakes AS, Jackson HB, Jackson SE, Cronin JT (2007) Landscape context outweighs local habitat quality in its effects on herbivore dispersal and distribution. Oecologia 151:431–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill JK, Thomas CD, Lewis OT (1996) Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: implications for metapopulation structure. J Anim Ecol 65:725–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003) Local species immigration, extinction, and turnover of butterflies in relation to habitat area and habitat isolation. Oecologia 137:591–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2004) Landscape occupancy and local population size depends on host plant distribution in the butterfly Cupido minimus. Biol Conserv 120:355–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes D, Shreeve TG, Dennis RLH (2006) A special issue on insect habitats. J Insect Conserv 10:1089–1093

    Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen A, Nieminen M (2002) Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Ecology 83:1131–1145

    Google Scholar 

  • New TR (2007) Understanding the requirements of the insects we seek to conserve. J Insect Conserv 11:95–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowicki P, Pepkowska A, Kudlek J, Skórka P, Witek M, Settele J, Woyciechowski M (2007) From metapopulation theory to conservation recommendations: lessons from spatial occurrence and abundance patterns of Maculinea butterflies. Biol Conserv 140:119–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ockinger E (2006) Possible metapopulation structure of the threatened butterfly Pyrgus armoricanus in Sweden. J Insect Conserv 10:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabel K-J, Fischer E (1992) Boden- und vegetationsgeographische Untersuchungen im Westerwald. Frankfurter geowiss. Arbeiten D 7:1–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawchik J, Dufrêne M, Lebrun P (2003) Estimation of habitat quality based on plant community, and effects of isolation in a network of butterfly habitat patches. Acta Oecologia 24:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz CB, Crone EE (2004) Patch size and connectivity thresholds for butterfly habitat restoration. Conserv Biol 19:887–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scion Corporation (2000) Scion Image, Release Beta 4.02. Maryland, USA

  • Smallidge PJ, Leopold DJ (1997) Vegetation management for the maintenance and conservation of butterfly habitats in temperate human-dominated landscapes. Landscape Urban Plan 38:259–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft Inc. (2003) Statistica for Windows. Version 6.1. Tulsa, USA

  • Thomas CD, Thomas JA, Warren MS (1992) Distributions of occupied and vacant butterfly habitats in fragmented landscapes. Oecologia 92:563–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Bourn NAD, Clarke RT, Stewart RT, Simcox DJ, Pearman GS, Curtis R, Goodger B (2001) The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1791–1796

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Swaay CAM, Warren MS (1999) Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera), Nature and Environment No. 99, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg

  • Vandewoestijne S, Martin T, Liégeois S, Baguette M (2004) Dispersal, landscape occupancy and population structure in the butterfly Melanargia galathea. Basic Appl Ecol 5:581–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidemann HJ (1995) Tagfalter beobachten, bestimmen. Naturbuch, Augsburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel M, Schmitt T, Weitzel M, Seitz A (2006) The severe decline of butterflies on western German calcerous grasslands during the last 30 years: a conservation problem. Biol Conserv 128:542–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne IR, Loxdale HD, Brookes CP, Woiwood IP (2003) Genetic structure of fragmented November moth (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) populations in farmland. Biol J Linn Soc 78:467–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Ministry of Environment and Forestry of Rhineland-Palatinate/Germany for financial support (fellowship to AD). SSB and KF were funded by the German Research Council during this study (DFG grant no. Fi 846/1-2, 846/1-3, and 846/1-4 to KF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie S. Bauerfeind.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bauerfeind, S.S., Theisen, A. & Fischer, K. Patch occupancy in the endangered butterfly Lycaena helle in a fragmented landscape: effects of habitat quality, patch size and isolation. J Insect Conserv 13, 271–277 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-008-9166-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-008-9166-1

Keywords

Navigation