Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ground beetle diversity in ancient woodland remnants in north-western Germany (Coleoptera, Carabidae)

  • OriginalPaper
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated ground beetle communities (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in ancient woodland remnants in north-western Lower Saxony, Germany. A total of 90 pitfall traps was exposed in a stratified design in 10 stands of mature oak–beech and oak–hornbeam forests in the year 2003. Overall, 47 species (10,676 individuals) were recorded. Among these were the two relict species Carabus glabratus and Abax parallelus, and 14 further eurytopic forest species. Eleven species exhibited a high frequency and were found in all of the ten stands. Multiple linear regressions showed several significant relationships at two scales for species richness of different groups of carabids and for several of the measured environmental factors. Forest area, litter depth, amount of dead wood, distance to forest edge, and soil moisture were found to be key factors determining species richness. Furthermore, recent disturbance by logging reduced the number of forest species. According to direct gradient analyses soil moisture and litter depth have greatest influence on species communities of both, forest species and widespread species. Habitat suitability models for the two recorded relict species, A. paralellus and C. glabratus, were developed using logistic regression. The presence of A. parallelus in the mature ancient woodland remnants depends mainly on higher values of soil moisture, whereas for C. glabratus none of the measured environmental variables appeared to be key factors. Implications for the conservation of carabid assemblages in mature ancient woodlands include the advice to spread out logging over long periods of time and over various woodlands in order to keep the stand disturbance at a long-term low level. Variation in logging practices may help to conserve diverse structures. Afforestation with non-native tree species should be avoided in the managed ancient woodlands. Finally, especially the preservation of a high soil moisture seems to be important to conserve typical carabid communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adis J (1979) Problems of interpreting arthropod sampling with pitfall traps. Zool Anz 202:177–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Antvogel H, Bonn A (2001) Environmental parameters and microspatial distribution of insects: a case study of carabids in an alluvial forest. Ecography 24:470–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assmann T (1994) Epigäische Coleopteren als Indikatoren für historisch alte Wälder der Nordwestdeutschen Tiefebene. NNA-Ber 7:142–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Assmann T (1999) The ground beetle fauna of ancient and recent woodlands in the lowlands of north-west Germany (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Biodiv Conserv 8:1499–1517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assmann T, Günther JM (2000) Relict populations in ancient woodlands:genetic differentiation, variability, and power of dispersal of Carabus glabratus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in north-western Germany. In: Brandmayr P, Lövei GL, Zetto Brandmayr T, Casale A, Vigna Taglianti A (eds) Natural history and applied ecology of carabid beetles. Pensoft, Sofia, pp 197–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Assmann T, Dormann W, Främbs H, Gürlich S, Handke K, Huk␣T, Sprick P, Terlutter H (2003) Rote Liste der in Niedersachsen und Bremen gefährdeten Sandlaufkäfer und Laufkäfer (Coleoptera:Cicindelidae et Carabidae) mit Gesamtartenverzeichnis, 1. Fassung vom 1.6.2002. Inf dienst Nat schutz Niedersachs 23:70–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Baguette M (1993) Habitat selection of carabid beetle in deciduous woodlands of southern Belgium. Pedobiologia 37:365–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1996) Ecology: individuals, populations and communities, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrends H (1994) Klimaatlas Weser-Ems. BSH special report 15:1–125

  • Berg A, Gärdenfors U, von Proschwitz T (2004) Logistic regression models for predicting occurrence of terrestrial molluscs in southern Sweden—importance of environmental data quality and model complexity. Ecography 27:83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binzenhöfer B, Schröder B, Strauss B, Biedermann R, Settele J (2005) Habitat models and habitat connectivity analysis for butterflies and burnet moths—the example of Zygaena carniolica and Coenonympha arcania. Biol Conserv 126:247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonn A, Schröder B (2001) Habitat models and their transfer for single- and multi species groups: a case study of carabids in an alluvial forest. Ecography 24:483–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bortmann I (1996) Heterogenitäten der Besiedlung durch Laufkäfer (Col.: Carabidae) in einem Buchenwald. Faunistisch-Ökologische Mitteilungen Suppl. 22:87–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield J, Luff ML, Baines M, Eyre MD (1995) Carabid beetle communities as indicators of conservation potential in uplandforests. For Ecol Manage 79:63–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christ TO, Wiens JA (1995) Individual movements and estimation of population size in darkling beetles (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J Anim Ecol 64:733–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KF, Margules CR (1998) Effects of habitat fragmentation on carabid beetles: experimental evidence. J Anim Ecol 67:460–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desender K (1996) Diversity and dynamics of coastal dune carabids. Ann Zool Fenn 33:65–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Desender K, Turin H (1989) Loss of habitats and changes in the composition of the ground and tiger beetle fauna in four West European countries since 1950 (Coleoptera: Carabidae, Cicindelidae). Biol Conserv 48:277–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desender K, Ervynck A, Tack G (1999) Beetle diversity and historical ecology of woodlands in Flanders. Belg J Zool 129:139–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Digweed SC, Currie CR, Cárcamo HA, Spence JR (1995) Digging out the “digging-in effect” of pitfall traps: influences of depletion and disturbance on catches of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Pedobiologia 39:561–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Dülge R (1992) Die Carabidenfauna (Coleoptera:Carabidae) ausgewählter Geestwälder nördlich von Bremen. Abhandlungen Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein Bremen 42:95–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Düll R, Wirth V, Werner W, Paulißen D (1992) Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Goltze-Verlag, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre MD, Luff ML, Stanley JR, Telfer MG (2003) The relationship between British ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and land cover. J Biogeogr 30:719–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falke B, Oevermann S, Assmann T (2000) Ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in a medieval wood-pasture reserve in north-west Germany. In: Brandmayr P, Lövei GL, Zetto Brandmayr T, Casale A, Vigna Taglianti A (eds) Natural history and applied ecology of carabid beetles. Pensoft, Sofia, pp 265–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch O-D (2005) Evaluation of mature conifer plantations as secondary habitats for epigeic forest arthropods (Coleoptera:Carabidae; Araneae). For Ecol Manage 204:21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finck P, Schröder E (1997) Waldvermehrung auf der Grundlage von bundesweiten Konzepten für naturschutzfachliche Landschafts-Leitbilder. Schriftenreihe Landschaftspflege u. Naturschutz 49:11–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenslade PJM (1964) Pitfall trapping as a method for studying populations of Carabidae (Coleoptera). J Anim Ecol 33:301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruttke H (1994) Dispersal of carabid species along a linear sequence of young hedge plantations. In: Desender K, Dufrene M, Loreau M, Luff ML, Maelfait J-P (eds) Carabid beetles: ecology and evolution. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 299–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillemain M, Loreau M, Daufresne T (1997) Relationships between the regional distribution of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and the abundance of their potential prey. Acta Oecol 18:465–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135:147–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günther JM, Assmann T (2000) Competition in the woodland? Phenology, body mass and body length of coexisting Carabus species—preliminary results (Coleoptera, Carabidae). In: Brandmayr P, Lövei GL, Zetto Brandmayr T, Casale A, Vigna Taglianti A (eds) Natural history and applied ecology of carabid beetles. Pensoft, Sofia, pp. 185–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Halme E, Niemelä J (1993) Carabid beetles in fragments of coniferous forest. Ann Zool Fenn 30:17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawes C, Stewart AJA, Evans HF (2002) The impacts of wood ants (Formica rufa) on the distribution and abundance of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a Scots pine plantation. Oecologia 131:612–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermy M, Honnay O, Firbank L, Grashof-Bokdam C, Lawesson JE (1999) An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and the implications for forest conservation. Biol Conserv 91:9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesmer H, Schroeder F-G (1963) Waldzusammensetzung und Waldbehandlung im Niedersächsischen Tiefland westlich der Weser und in der Münsterschen Bucht bis Ende des 18. Jahrhunderts. Decheniana, Beihefte 11:1–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression.Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huber C, Baumgarten M (2005) Early effects of forest regeneration with selective and small scale clear-cutting on ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in a Norway spruce stand in Southern Bavaria (Höglwald). Biodiv Conserv 14:1989–2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irmler U (1999) Environmental characteristics of ground beetle assemblages in northern German forests as basis for an expert system. Zeitschrift für Ökologie u. Naturschutz 8:227–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman RHG, Ter Braak CJF, Van Tongeren OFR (1995) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Judas M, Dornieden K, Strothmann U (2002) Distribution patterns of carabid beetle species at the landscape level. J␣Biogeogr 29:491–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein M (1997) Naturschutz und Erstaufforstung – eine Einführung. Schriftenreihe Landschaftspflege u. Naturschutz 49:7–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleyer M, Kratz R, Lutze G, Schröder B (2000) Habitatmodelle für Tierarten: Entwicklung, Methoden und Perspektiven für die Anwendung. Zeitschrift für ökologie u. Naturschutz 8:177–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivula M (2002) Alternative harvesting methods and boreal carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). For Ecol Manage 167:103–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koivula M, Punttila P, Haila Y, Niemelä J (1999) Leaflitter and the small-scale distribution of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in the boreal forest. Ecography 22:424–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koivula M, Hyyryläinen V, Soininen E (2004) Carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) at forest-farmland edges in southern Finland. J Insect Conserv 8:297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Margules CR, Botkin DB (2000) Indicators of biodiversity for ecologically sustainable forest management. Conserv Biol 14:941–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löser S (1970) Brutpflege und Brutfürsorge bei Laufkäfern der Gattung Abax. Verhandlungen deutsche zoologische Gesellschaft Würzburg 1969:322–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Lövei G, Sunderland KD (1996) Ecology and behaviour ofground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Ann Rev Entomol 41:231–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M (1987) Vertical distribution of activity of carabid beetles in a beech forest floor. Pedobiologia 30:173–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Magura T (2002) Carabids and forest edge: spatial pattern and edge effect. For Ecol Manage 157:23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magura T, Ködöböcz V, Tóthmérész B (2001a) Effects of habitat fragmentation on carabids in forest patches. J Biogeogr 28:129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magura T, Tóthmérész B, Molnár T (2001b) Forest edge and diversity: carabids along forest-grassland transects. Biodiv Conserv 10:287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magura T, Tóthmérész B, Elek Z (2003) Diversity and composition of carabids during a forestry cycle. Biodiv Conserv 12:73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data (version 4.25). MJM Software Design, Oregon, USA

  • Molnar T, Magura T, Tothmeresz B, Elek Z (2001) Ground beetles (Carabidae) and edge effect in oak–hornbeam forest and grassland transects. Eur J Soil Biol 37:297–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naujok J, Finch O-D (2004) Communities and spatio-temporal patterns of epigeic beetles (Coleoptera) in high mountain habitats of the Central Norwegian Scandes, with special emphasis on carabid beetles (Carabidae). Nor J Entomol 51:31–55

    Google Scholar 

  • New TR (1995) An introduction to invertebrate conservation biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J (1993) Mystery of the missing species: species-abundance distribution of boreal ground beetles. Ann Zool Fenn 30:169–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J (1997) Invertebrates and boreal forest management. Conserv Biol 11:601–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J, Haila Y, Halme E, Lahti T, Pajunen T, Punttila P (1988) The distribution of carabid beetles in fragments of old coniferous taiga and adjacent managed forest. Ann Zool Fenn 25:107–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J, Haila Y, Halme E, Pajunen T, Punttila P (1992) Small-scale heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of carabidbeetles in the southern Finnish taiga. J Biogeogr 19:173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J, Langor D, Spence JR (1993) Effects of clear-cut harvesting on boreal ground beetles assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Western Canada. Conserv Biol 7:551–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolakaki P, Dunnett N (2005) The use of spatial concepts as a basis for designing a viable-habitat network: conserving redstart (Phoenicurus phoenicurus) populations in Sherwood Forest, England. J Nature Conserv 13:31–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NMELF 1999 (Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten) (ed) (1999) Der Has-bruch—Naturkundliche Beschreibung eines norddeutschen Waldes. Schriftenreihe Waldentwicklung Niedersachsen 8:1–135 S

  • Norden B, Appelqvist T (2001) Conceptual problems of ecological continuity and its bioindicators. Biodiv Conserv 10:779–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otto H-J (1991) Langfristige, ökologische Waldbauplanung für die Niedersächsischen Landesforsten—Band 2. Aus demWalde 43:1–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Paje F, Mossakowski D (1984) pH-preferences and habitat selection in carabid beetles. Oecologia 64:41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters ETH, Gardeniers JJP (1998) Logistic regression as a tool for defining habitat requirements of two common gamma-rids. Freshw Biol 39:605–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterken G (1993) Woodland conservation and management. Chapman & Hall, London, 374 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Pott R (1999) Diversity of pasture-woodlands of north-western Germany. In: Kratochwil A (ed) Biodiversity in ecosystems. Kluwer, The Netherlands, pp 107–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Pott R, Hüppe J (1991) Die Hudelandschaften Nordwestdeutschlands. Abhandlungen aus dem Westfälischen Museum für Naturkunde 53:1–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Rackham O (1980) Ancient woodland: its history, vegetation and uses in England. Edward Arnolds, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainio J, Niemelä J (2003) Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodiv Conserv 12:487–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol 5:18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherzinger W (1996) Naturschutz im Wald. Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Speight MCD (1989) Saproxylic invertebrates and their conservation. Council of Europe, Nature and Environment Series 36:1–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence JR, Niemelä J (1994) Sampling carabid assemblages with pitfall traps—the madness and the method. Can Entomol 126:881–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence JR, Langor DW, Niemelä J, Cárcamo HA, Currie CR (1996) Northern forestry and carabids: the case for concern about old-growth species. Ann Zool Fenn 33:173–184

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc. (2003) SPSS für Windows 12.0.1. SPSS Inc. Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • Sustek Z (1994) Windbreaks as migration corridors for carabids in an agricultural landscape. In: Desender K, Dufrene M, Loreau M, Luff ML, Maelfait J-P (eds) Carabid beetles: ecology and evolution. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 377–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrell-Nield C (1990) Is it possible to age woodlands on the basis of their carabid diversity? Entomologist 109:136–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiele H-U (1977) Carabid beetles in their environments. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Turin H (2000) De Nederlandse loopkevers: verspreiding en oecologie (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Nederlands Fauna 3, Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum Naturalis, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Turin H, Heijerman T (1988) Ecological classification of forest-dwelling carabidae (Coleoptera) in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 131:65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Turin H, Alders K, den Boer PJ, van Essen S, Heijerman T, Laane W, Pentermann E (1991) Ecological characterisation of carabid species (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in The Netherlands from thirty years of pitfall sampling. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 134:279–304

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1992) Agenda 21: the United Nations programme of action from Rio. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher M, Field J, Bedford S (1993) Biogeography and diversity of ground-dwelling arthropods in farm woodlands. Biodiv Lett 1:54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vossel E, Assmann T (1995) Die Chilopoden, Diplopoden und Carabiden unterschiedlich genutzter Waldflächen bei Bentheim (Südwest-Niedersachsen): Vergleich eines Wirt schaftshochwaldes mit zwei ehemaligen Hudeflächen. Drosera 95:127–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson BR, Moffat AJ, Nortcliff S (1997) The nature of three ancient woodland soils in southern England. J Biogeogr 24:633–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf M (1997) Plant species as indicators of ancient woodland in northwestern Germany. J Veget Sci 8:635–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf M (2003) Preference of plant species for woodlands with differing habitat continuities. Flora 198:444–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf M, Kelm H-J (1994) Zur Bedeutung “historisch alterWälder” für den Naturschutz—Untersuchungen naturnaher Wälder im Elbe-Weser-Dreieck. NNA-Ber 7:15–49

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the foundation of the electric power company Weser-Ems (EWE-Stiftung). The forest officials of the Forstamt Hasbruch, in particular L.␣Stegink-Hindricks, H. Thielking and J. Steffens, supported us with valuable advice. PD Dr. R. Biedermann (University of Oldenburg) helped us with some of the statistical analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver-D. Finch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sroka, K., Finch, OD. Ground beetle diversity in ancient woodland remnants in north-western Germany (Coleoptera, Carabidae). J Insect Conserv 10, 335–350 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-006-9008-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-006-9008-y

Keywords

Navigation