Skip to main content
Log in

Radiofrequency ablation using the second-generation temperature-controlled diamond tip system in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation: results from FASTR-AF

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Catheter ablation (CA) technology development reflects the need to improve the effectiveness of atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment. Recently, the DiamondTemp Ablation (DTA) RF generator software was updated with a more responsive power ramp.

Methods

DIAMOND FASTR-AF was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial. This study sought to characterize the performance of the updated DTA system for the treatment of patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal and persistent AF (PAF and PsAF). The primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence following a 90-day blanking period through 12 months, and the primary safety endpoint was a composite of serious adverse events.

Results

In total, 60 subjects (34 PAF and 26 PsAF) underwent CA at three centers. Patients were 71.7% male, (age 63.9 ± 10.2 years, with an AF diagnosis duration 3.1 ± 3.9 years and left atrial size 4.4 ± 0.8 cm). Pulmonary vein isolation-only ablation strategy was performed in 34 (56.7%) subjects. The procedural characteristics show a procedure time 90.8 ± 31.6 min, total RF time 14.7 ± 7.7 min, ablation duration 10.7 ± 3.6 s, and fluid infusion 284.7 ± 111.5 ml. The serious adverse event rate was 8.3% (5/60), 3 pulmonary edema and 2 extended hospitalizations. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence was achieved in 67.6% of subjects by 12 months.

Conclusions

The updated DTA system demonstrated long-term safety and effectiveness through 12 months of post-ablation follow-up for patients with atrial fibrillation. Additionally, procedures were demonstrated to be highly efficient with short procedure times and low levels of fluid infusion.

Trial registration

Sponsored by Medtronic, Inc.; FASTR-AF ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03626649.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AAD:

Anti-arrhythmic drug

AF:

Atrial fibrillation

AFL:

Atrial flutter

AT:

Atrial tachycardia

CA:

Catheter ablation

ECG:

Electrocardiogram

DTA:

DiamondTemp Ablation

LA:

Left atrial

PAF:

Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

PsAF:

Persistent atrial fibrillation

PV:

Pulmonary vein

PVI:

Pulmonary vein isolation

RF:

Radiofrequency

References

  1. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(10):e275–444.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Haïssaguerre M, Jaïs P, Shah DC, et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(10):659–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(19):1812–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Neuzil P, Reddy VY, Kautzner J, et al. Electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment: results from the EFFICAS I study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(2):327–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kautzner J, Neuzil P, Lambert H, et al. EFFICAS II: optimization of catheter contact force improves outcome of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;17(8):1229–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Das M, Wynn GJ, Saeed Y, et al. Pulmonary vein re-isolation as a routine strategy regardless of symptoms: the PRESSURE randomized controlled trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3(6):602–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Iwasawa J, Koruth JS, Petru J, et al. Temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(5):542–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hussein A, Das M, Riva S, et al. Use of ablation index-guided ablation results in high rates of durable pulmonary vein isolation and freedom from arrhythmia in persistent atrial fibrillation patients: the PRAISE study results. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11(9):e006576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pranata R, Vania R, Huang I. Ablation-index guided versus conventional contact-force guided ablation in pulmonary vein isolation - systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2019;19(4):155–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ioannou A, Papageorgiou N, Lim WY, et al. Efficacy and safety of ablation index-guided catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis. Europace. 2020;22(11):1659–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Naniwadekar A, Dukkipati SR. High-power short-duration ablation of atrial fibrillation: a contemporary review. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;44(3):528–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14167 (Epub 2021 Jan 31).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nilsson B, Chen X, Pehrson S, Svendsen JH. The effectiveness of a high output/short duration radiofrequency current application technique in segmental pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2006;8(11):962–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bunch TJ, Day JD. Novel ablative approach for atrial fibrillation to decrease risk of esophageal injury. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5(4):624–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Qiu J, Wang Y, Wang DW, Hu M, Chen G. Update on high-power short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31(9):2499–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Winkle RA. HPSD ablation for AF high-power short-duration RF ablation for atrial fibrillation: a review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.14863 (Epub ahead of print).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stoffregen W, Maddox W, Couco F. B-PO02-094 – temperature sensing accuracy and lesion characteristics of a novel, diamond tip, temperature-controlled open irrigated radiofrequency catheter. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(5):S218.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Verma A, Schmidt MM, Lalonde JP, Ramirez DA, Getman MK. Assessing the relationship of applied force and ablation duration on lesion size using a diamond tip catheter ablation system. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021;14(7):e009541.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kautzner J, Albenque JP, Natale A, et al. A novel temperature-controlled radiofrequency catheter ablation system used to treat patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;7(3):352–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Starek Z, Lehar F, Jez J, et al. Efficacy and safety of novel temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation system during pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: TRAC-AF study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-021-00986-0 (Epub ahead of print).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mansour M, Calkins H, Osorio J, et al. Persistent atrial fibrillation ablation with contact force-sensing catheter: the prospective multicenter PRECEPT trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(8):958–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chinitz LA, Melby DP, Marchlinski FE, et al. Safety and efficiency of porous-tip contact-force catheter for drug-refractory symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: results from the SMART SF trial. Europace. 2018;20(FI_3):f392–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Neuzil P, Poty H, de Chillou C, et al. AFS2022–34 - procedural efficiencies using a novel diamond tip radiofrequency ablation catheter when treating atrial fibirllation.Abstracts from the 27th Annual International Atrial Fibrillation Symposium January 13–15, 2022. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the invaluable contributions of the trial team, including the trial participants, FASTR-AF sites and their dedicated staff, and the Medtronic staff (Nina Kristiansen, Bob Hokanson, and Hae Lim).

Funding

This study was sponsored by Epix Therapeutics, Inc. (EPIX; Sunnyvale, CA, USA), which was acquired by Medtronic, Inc. in March 2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petr Neuzil.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The Institutional Review Boards of each participating center reviewed and approved the study protocol. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Conflict of interest

MKG and SL receive compensation as employees of Medtronic, Inc. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 142 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neuzil, P., Poty, H., de Chillou, C. et al. Radiofrequency ablation using the second-generation temperature-controlled diamond tip system in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation: results from FASTR-AF. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 66, 343–351 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01234-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01234-9

Keywords

Navigation