Abstract
The His bundle divides into the right bundle branch (RBB) and the more complex left bundle branch (LBB). The latter is typically represented as further dividing into anterior and posterior fascicles, and possibly an additional septal fascicle. This construct raises questions as to why conduction can be preserved in patients with “trifascicular block” and why it sometimes very difficult to ablate fascicular or papillary muscle tachycardias. The answer may be that the LBB is much more complex, variable, and interconnected and that the simple familiar constructs may have obstructed our understanding of conduction and tachycardias. Remarkably, the actual explanatory histopathology has been known for nearly half a century, spearheaded by the work of Demoulin and Kulbertus. One picture is worth a thousand words.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tawara S. Das Reizleitungssystem des Saeugetierherzens: eine anatomisch-histologische Studie uber die Atrioventrikularbundel und der Purkinjeschen Faden. Jena, Germany: Verslag Gustav Fischer; 1906. p. 35–201.
Tawara S. Die topographie und histologie der bruckenfaser: ein beitrag zur lehre vonder bedeutung der Purkinjeschen faden Zantralbl Physiol. 1906; 19: 70–79.
Narula OS. Longitudinal dissociation in the His bundle. Bundle branch block due to asynchronous conduction within the His bundle in man. Circulation. 1977;56(6):996–1006.
Lazzara R, Yeh BK, Samet P. Functional transverse interconnections within the His bundle and the bundle branches. Circ Research. 1973;32:509–15.
Fisher JD. Bundle branch reentry tachycardia: why is the HV often longer than in sinus rhythm? The critical role of anisotropic conduction. J Interven Card Electr (JICE). 2001;5:173–6.
Sarkozy A, Boussy T, Chierchia GB, Geelen P, Brugada P. An unusual form of bundle branch reentrant tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006;17:902–6.
Demoulin JC, Kulbertus HE. Histopathological examination of concept of left hemiblock. British Heart Journal, I972, 34, 807–814.
Titus J. Normal anatomy of the human cardiac conduction system. Anesth Analg. 1973;52(4):508–14.
Rosenbaum MB, Elizari MV, Lazzari I. Los Hemibloqueos. Buenos Aires: Ed. Paidos; 1967.
Dhingra RC, Denes P, Wu D, Chuquimia R, Amat-y-Leon F, Wyndham C, et al. Syncope in patients with chronic bifascicular block: significance, causative mechanisms, and clinical implications. Ann Intern Med. 1974;81(3):302–6.
Rotman M, Triebwasser JH. A clinical and follow-up study of right and left bundle branch block. Circulation. 1975;51(3):477–84.
Dhingra RC, Wyndham C, Bauernfeind R, Denes P, Wu D, Swiryn S, et al. Significance of chronic bifascicular block without apparent organic heart disease. Circulation. 1979;60:33–9.
Surawicz B. Prognosis of patients with chronic bifascicular block. Circulation. 1979;60:40–2.
Barrett PA, Peter CT, Swan HJC, et al. The frequency and prognostic significance of electrocardiographic abnormalities in clinically normal individual. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1981;23:299–319.
Flowers NC. Left bundle branch block: a continuously evolving concept. JACC. 1987;9(3):684–97.
Watt TB, Murao S, Pruitt RD. Left axis deviation induced experimentally in a primate heart. Am Heart J. 1965;70:381–9.
Lazzara R, Yeh BK, Samet P. Functional anatomy of the canine left bundle branch. Am J Cardiol. 1974;33:623–31.
Massing GK, James TN. Anatomical configuration of the His bundle and bundle branches in the human heart. Circulation. 1976;53:609–21.
Milliken JA. Isolated and complicated left anterior fascicular block: a review of suggested electrocardiographic criteria. J Electrocardiol. 1983;16(2):199–212.
Perez Riera AR, Uchida AH, Schapachnik E, Dubner S, Zhang L, Filho F, et al. The history of left septal fascicular block: chronological considerations of a reality yet to be universally accepted. Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal. 2008;8(2):114–28.
Hoffman I, Mehta J, Hilsenrath J, Hamby RI. Anterior conduction delay: a possible cause for prominent anterior QRS forces. J Electrocardiol. 1976;9(1):15–21.
Reiffel JA, Bigger JT. Pure anterior conduction delay: a variant “fascicular” defect. J. Electrocardiology. 1978;11(4):315–9.
Willems JL, Robles de Medina EO, Bernard R, Coumel P, Fisch C, Krikler D, et al. Criteria for intraventricular conduction disturbances and pre-excitation. JACC. 1985;5(6):1261–5.
Mazur A, Kusniec J, Boris SB. Bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia. Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal. 2005;5(2):86–95.
Kapa S, Gaba P, DeSimone CV, Asirvatham SJ. Fascicular ventricular arrhythmias: pathophysiologic mechanisms, anatomical constructs, and advances in approaches to management. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017;10:1–14.
Al’Aref SJ, Ip JE, Markowitz SM, Liu CF, Thomas G, Frenkel D, et al. Differentiation of papillary muscle from fascicular and mitral annular ventricular arrhythmias in patients with and without structural heart disease. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8:616–24.
Crijns HJGM, Smeets JLRM, Rodriguez LM, Meijer A, Wellens HJJ. Cure of interfascicular reentrant ventricular tachycardia by ablation of the anterior fascicle of the left bundle branch. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1995;6(6):486–92.
Sadanaga T, Saeki K, Yoshimoto T, Funatsu Y, Miyazaki T. Repetitive monomorphic ventricular tachycardia of left coronary cusp origin. PACE. 1999;22:1553–6.
Kulbertus HE. The hemiblocks: a decade of study. Boehringer-Ingelheim monograph 1979. Pp 1–69; p 11, Figure 6 (by Demoulin JC).
Demoulin JC, Kulbertus HE. Histopathologic correlates of left posterior fascicular block. Am J Cardiol. 1979;44(6):1083–8.
Lev M, Unger PN, Rosen KM, Bharati S. The anatomic substrate of complete left bundle branch block. Circulation. 1974;50:479–86.
Rossi L. Histopathology of conducting system in left anterior hemiblock. Br Heart J. 1976;38:1304–11.
Kron IL, DiMarco JP, Nolan SP, Lerman BB. Resection of scarred papillary muscles improves outcome after surgery for ventricular. Ann Surg. 1986;203(6):685–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fisher, J.D. Hemiblocks and the fascicular system: myths and implications. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 52, 281–285 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-018-0440-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-018-0440-1