Skip to main content
Log in

Outcomes of pre-emptive and rescue use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with structural heart disease undergoing catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Patient selection and timing of percutaneous left ventricular assist device (pLVAD) insertion for maximal benefit during ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation is not well defined. We aimed to assess the outcomes of pre-emptive and rescue use of pLVAD during VT ablation in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Methods

Between January 2009 and October 2011, 93 patients underwent VT ablation. Three groups were compared: (1) Rescue group (n = 12)—patients who required emergent pLVAD insertion due to hemodynamic collapse during VT ablation, (2) Pre-emptive group (n = 24)—patients who had pre-ablation pLVAD insertion, and (3) Non-pLVAD group (n = 57)—patients who did not undergo pLVAD insertion. Procedural outcomes including 30-day mortality were compared.

Results

Thirty-day mortality was higher in the Rescue group compared to the Pre-emptive group (58 vs. 4 %, p = 0.003) and non-pLVAD (58 vs. 3 %, p = 0.001) group. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality or long-term freedom of VT between the pre-emptive and non-pLVAD groups.

Conclusions

Despite rescue pLVAD insertion, hemodynamic collapse during VT ablation is associated with a persistently high 30-day mortality. Further studies are warranted to predict hemodynamic collapse and to refine the role of pLVAD in this setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CABG:

Coronary artery bypass grafting

ECMO:

Extra corporeal mechanical oxygenation

LAP:

Left atrial pressure

LVEDD:

Left ventricular end diastolic dimension

LVEDP:

Left ventricular end diastolic pressure

LVEF:

Left ventricular ejection fraction

MAP:

Mean arterial pressure

NYHA:

New York Heart Association

VT:

Ventricular tachycardia

pLVAD:

Percutaneous left ventricular assist device

References

  1. Tanner H, Hindricks G, Volkmer M, Furniss S, Kuhlkamp V, Lacroix D, et al. Catheter ablation of recurrent scar-related ventricular tachycardia using electroanatomical mapping and irrigated ablation technology: results of the prospective multicenter Euro-VT-study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:47–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stevenson WG, Wilber DJ, Natale A, Jackman WM, Marchlinski FE, Talbert T, et al. Irrigated radiofrequency catheter ablation guided by electroanatomic mapping for recurrent ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction: the multicenter thermocool ventricular tachycardia ablation trial. Circulation. 2008;118:2773–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zeppenfeld K, Stevenson WG. Ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008;31:358–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bohnen M, Stevenson WG, Tedrow UB, Michaud GF, John RM, Epstein LM, et al. Incidence and predictors of major complications from contemporary catheter ablation to treat cardiac arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:1661–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller MA, Dukkipati SR, Mittnacht AJ, Chinitz JS, Belliveau L, Koruth JS, et al. Activation and entrainment mapping of hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia using a percutaneous left ventricular assist device. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1363–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sosa E, Scanavacca M, d’Avila A, Pilleggi F. A new technique to perform epicardial mapping in the electrophysiology laboratory. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996;7:531–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dixon SR, Henriques JP, Mauri L, Sjauw K, Civitello A, Kar B, et al. A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 2.5 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (the PROTECT I trial): initial U.S. experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:91–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cook S, Windecker S. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices during cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2009;11:369–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Santangeli P, Muser D, Zado ES, Magnani S, Khetpal S, Hutchinson MD, et al. Acute hemodynamic decompensation during catheter ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia: incidence, predictors, and impact on mortality. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8:68–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maini B, Naidu SS, Mulukutla S, Kleiman N, Schreiber T, Wohns D, et al. Real-world use of the Impella 2.5 circulatory support system in complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the USpella Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011.

  11. Basra SS, Loyalka P, Kar B. Current status of percutaneous ventricular assist devices for cardiogenic shock. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2011;26:548–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sjauw KD, Konorza T, Erbel R, Danna PL, Viecca M, Minden HH, et al. Supported high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 device the Europella registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:2430–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kar B, Gregoric ID, Basra SS, Idelchik GM, Loyalka P. The percutaneous ventricular assist device in severe refractory cardiogenic shock. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:688–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Friedman PA, Munger TM, Torres N, Rihal C. Percutaneous endocardial and epicardial ablation of hypotensive ventricular tachycardia with percutaneous left ventricular assist in the electrophysiology laboratory. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18:106–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abuissa H, Roshan J, Lim B, Asirvatham SJ. Use of the Impella microaxial blood pump for ablation of hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:458–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zanobini M, Rossi F, Bertera A, Sandano S, Costa C, Fabrizi R, et al. Cardiopulmonary support during electrophysiological procedures for ventricular tachycardias not haemodynamically tolerated. Perfusion. 2003;18:79–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Carbucicchio C, Della Bella P, Fassini G, Trevisi N, Riva S, Giraldi F, et al. Percutaneous cardiopulmonary support for catheter ablation of unstable ventricular arrhythmias in high-risk patients. Herz. 2009;34:545–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bunch TJ, Darby A, May HT, Ragosta M, Lim DS, Taylor AM, et al. Efficacy and safety of ventricular tachycardia ablation with mechanical circulatory support compared with substrate-based ablation techniques. Europace. 2012;14:709–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Reddy YM, Chinitz L, Mansour M, Bunch TJ, Mahapatra S, Swarup V, et al. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices in ventricular tachycardia ablation: multicenter experience. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:244–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu R, Ma S, Tung R, Stevens S, Macias C, Bradfield J, et al. Catheter ablation of scar-based ventricular tachycardia: relationship of procedure duration to outcomes and hospital mortality. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:86–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tung R, Vaseghi M, Frankel DS, Vergara P, Di Biase L, Nagashima K, et al. Freedom from recurrent ventricular tachycardia after catheter ablation is associated with improved survival in patients with structural heart disease: an International VT Ablation Center Collaborative Group study. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:1997–2007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nilesh Mathuria.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mathuria, N., Wu, G., Rojas-Delgado, F. et al. Outcomes of pre-emptive and rescue use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with structural heart disease undergoing catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 48, 27–34 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-016-0168-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-016-0168-8

Keywords

Navigation