Abstract
Introduction
A recent single-center report indicated that the performance of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients on uninterrupted warfarin using a conventional deflectable tip electrode ablation catheter may be as safe as peri-procedural discontinuation of warfarin and bridging with heparin. Novel multi-electrode array catheters for atrial fibrillation ablation are currently undergoing clinical evaluation. While offering the possibility of more rapid atrial fibrillation ablation, they are stiffer and necessitate the deployment of larger deflectable transseptal sheaths, and it remains to be determined if they increase the risk of cardiac perforation and vascular injury. Such potential risks would have implications for a strategy of uninterrupted peri-procedural anticoagulation.
Method and Results
We audited the safety outcomes of our atrial fibrillation ablation procedures using multi-electrode array ablation catheters in patients on uninterrupted warfarin (CHADS2 score ≥ 2) and in patients not on warfarin (uninterrupted aspirin). Two bleeding complications occurred in 49 patients on uninterrupted warfarin, both of which were managed successfully without long-term sequelae, and no bleeding complication occurred in 32 patients not on warfarin (uninterrupted aspirin). There were no thromboembolic events or other complication with either anticoagulant regimen.
Conclusion
Despite the larger diameter and increased stiffness of multi-electrode array catheters and their deflectable transseptal sheaths, their use for catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation on uninterrupted warfarin in this single-center experience does not appear to be unsafe, and thus, an adequately powered multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial should be considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gage, B. F., Waterman, A. D., Shannon, W., Boechler, M., Rich, M. W., & Radford, M. J. (2001). Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: Results from the national registry of atrial fibrillation. JAMA, 285, 2864–2870.
Capatto, R., Calkins, H., Chen, S., Davies, W., Iesaka, Y., Kalman, J., et al. (2009). Prevalance and causes of fatal outcome in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 53(19), 1798–1803.
Cappato, R., Calkins, H., Chen, S., Davies, W., Iesaka, Y., Kalman, J., et al. (2005). Worldwide survey on methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 111(9), 1100–1105.
Dagres, N., Hindricks, G., Kottkamp, H., Sommer, P., Gaspar, T., Bode, K., et al. (2009). Complications of atrial fibrillation ablation in a high-volume centre in 1000 procedures: Still a cause for concern? Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 20, 1014–1019.
Oral, H., Chugh, A., Ozaydm, M., Good, E., Fortino, J., Sankaran, S., et al. (2006). Risk of thromboembolic events after percutaneous left atrial radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 114, 759–765.
Zhou, J., Liu, S., Nie, Z., Wu, H., Zhou, J., Hao, Y., et al. (2007). Thromboembolic event rate in patients with persistent or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation post circumferential pulmonary vein isolation: A single center experience in China. Chinese Medical Journal, 120, 956–959.
Zhou, L., Keane, D., Reed, G., & Ruskin, J. (1999). Thromboembolic complications of cardiac radiofrequency catheter ablation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 10, 611–620.
Blanc, J., Almendral, J., Brignole, M., Fatemi, M., Gjesdal, K., Gonzalez-Torrecilla, E., et al. (2008). Consensus document on antithrombotic therapy in the setting of electrophysiological procedures. Europace, 10, 513–527.
Wazni, O. M., Beheiry, S., Fahmy, T., Barrett, C., Hao, S., Patel, D., et al. (2007). Atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with therapeutic international normalized ratio: Comparison of strategies of anticoagulation management in the periprocedural period. Circulation, 116, 2531–2534.
De Filippo, P., He, D. S., Brambilla, R., Gavazzi, A., & Cantu, F. (2009). Clinical experience with a single catheter for mapping and ablation of pulmonary vein ostium. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 20, 367–373.
Steinwender, C., Honig, S., Lesch, F., & Hoffman, R. (2009). Acute results of pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using single mesh catheter. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 20, 147–152.
Pratola, C., Notarstefano, P., Artale, P., Baldo, E., Toselli, T., & Ferrari, R. (2008). Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation with the multipolar mapping and ablation catheter (Mesh-Bard). PACE, 31, 753–756.
Weiss, C., Stewart, M., Franzen, O., Rostock, T., Becker, J., Skarda, J., et al. (2004). Transmembraneous irrigation of multipolar radiofrequency ablation catheters: Induction of linear lesions encircling the pulmonary vein ostium without the risk of coagulum formation? Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 10, 199–209.
Obel, O., Mansour, M., Picard, M., Ruskin, J., & Keane, D. (2004). Persistence of septal defects after transseptal puncture for pulmonary vein isolation procedures. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 27, 1411–1414.
Keane, D., Mansour, M., & Singh, J. (2004). Detection by intracardiac echocardiography of early formation of left atrial thrombus during pulmonary vein isolation. Europace, 6, 109–110.
Mansour, M., Ruskin, J., & Keane, D. (2004). Efficacy and safety of segmental ostial versus circumferential extra-ostial pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 15, 532–537.
Hassink, R., Aretz, T., Ruskin, J., & Keane, D. (2003). Morphology of atrial myocardium in human pulmonary veins. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 42, 1108–1114.
Hsu, L. F., Jais, P., Keane, D., Wharton, J. M., Deisenhofer, I., Hocini, M., et al. (2004). Atrial fibrillation originating from persistent left superior vena cava. Circulation, 109, 828–832.
Killeen, R., O’Connor, S., Keane, D., & Dodd, J. (2009). Ectopic focus in an accessory left atrial appendage: Radiofrequency ablation of refractory atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 120, e60–e62.
Martinez, M., Kirsch, J., Syed, I., Feng, D., Ommen, S., Packer, D., et al. (2009). Utility of nongated multidetector computed tomography for detection of left atrial thrombus in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2, 69–76.
Ohyama, H., Hosomi, N., Takahashi, T., Mizushige, K., Osaka, K., Kohno, M., et al. (2003). Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and transesophageal echocardiography in detection of thrombus in left atrail appendage. Stroke, 34, 2436–2439.
Palareti, G. & Legnani, C. (1996). Warfarin withdrawl. Pharmokinetic–pharmacodynamic considerations. Clin Pharacokinet, 30, 300–313.
Grip, L., Blomback, M., & Schulman, S. (1991). Hypercoagulable state and thromboembolism following warfarin withdrawal in post-myocardial-infarction patients. European Heart Journal, 12, 1225–1233.
Arepelly, G. & Ortel, T. (2006). Heparin induced thrombocytopenia. New England Journal of Medicine, 355, 809.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful for the statistical assistance of Mr. Mark Ledwidge.
Disclosures
David Keane is a consultant with Bard, MA and Sanofi Aventis and has a patent licensing agreement with Ablation Frontiers, MN.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hayes, C.R., Keane, D. Safety of atrial fibrillation ablation with novel multi-electrode array catheters on uninterrupted anticoagulation—a single-center experience. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 27, 117–122 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-009-9457-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-009-9457-9